General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsusually harsh internet gives a pass to hotel housekeeper caught looking at guests belongings
Guy secretly films his hotel room. Catches housekeeper checking out his fancy stuff. I cringed- expecting the usual torrent of internet judgment and fascism... Instead... This
Highest rated comments: Natural curiosity, nothing more, but this lady has probably been fired now
"Checking out" ... you mean looking at . Nothing stolen so no story. If you leave your bedroom in a mess with all you stuff lying around, house keeping will likely look at it and pick it up. Grow up and stop whingeing.
As well as giving the TV a dust down, cleaning the bathroom and changing the sheets, the housekeeper began digging through the guest's personal belongings.
The woman had a close look at a package that the guest had delivered before moving on to examine his games console, a PS3, and the games with it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2829798/Video-reveals-hotel-cleaners-REALLY-room.html
Apparently unaware that she was being filmed, the housekeeper then has a close look at the laptop, coming full-face in front of the camera, before turning her attention to a tablet device.
Then she turns her attention to making the bed - but it's not long before she is drawn to the contents inside the guest's suitcase.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)That dude has no real complaint...So I'm wondering why he even bothered to film it -- He also sounds like the type of entitled asshole who has never tipped housekeeping in his life...
And for the record, if he's that touchy about housekeeping handling his precious "stuff", he *does* know that he can leave a message for the staff to JUST do the bathroom, or JUST make up the beds while leaving everything else where it is, right??
If he really wants to do a public service, then he could sneak a hidden camera into the baggage handling section of a major airport...
840high
(17,196 posts)my belongings examined.
kcr
(15,315 posts)and have housekeeping come clean it.
I have a feeling that if this were a white woman, she would just be 'curious', like during Katrina where white people were scavengers and black people were looters, both doing the same thing.
Not saying who you are responding to thinks this, but more than should will think this.
kcr
(15,315 posts)I'm assuming that was the reason for the camera set up in the first place.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I go to CES every year and nearly always take my laptop and iPhone with me when I leave the room for the day though I'd had no problem leaving my laptop in the room. I travel light and wouldn't have much to look at other than show literature and books.
Who travels with a video game system besides pro athletes? I guess this illustrates the vast gulf between myself and the modern generation.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I used to take my game console with me -- Especially for work-related trips and conferences where I pretty much couldn't leave the hotel for 3-4 days...
BeeBee
(1,074 posts)and she rifled through his suitcases. That is not OK.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Weird how so many DUers are twisting themselves into knots to justify this creepy behavior.
BeeBee
(1,074 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Given that she's earning minimum wage to scrub shitty toilets and clean semen-stained sheets all day (nevermind the fact that while what she did was questionable at best and highly irresponsible at the worst, she didn't break any laws)...And there were better ways Stravix could have handled this without being the oh-so-cliché passive-aggressive Millennial...
And if anyone is outraged over this, please, I beg of you, don't ever investigate what airliners and airports do to your luggage...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Looking at something sitting on a table is one thing. That is quite another.
840high
(17,196 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and rummaged through your files, emails, and browsing history, but did not actually steal anything or cause any damage, you would be just fine with that? No real complaint?
And how about if the NSA does the same thing?
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)People have a right to expect as much privacy as can possibly be provided, except where it comes into direct conflict with the ordinary performance of an expected job or task. It's one of the reasons that we have doctor-patient privilege, where a doctor cannot be compelled to testify about what he or she has heard a patient say under distress or anesthesia.
This housekeeper's behavior is unacceptable. As for using a webcam to catch it, it's no worse than someone using a nanny cam to catch a thief or a drunk.
msongs
(67,366 posts)like the plumber goes thru all your stuff when you are not looking, or the paper boy/girl takes a spin thru your garage behind your back. or the cop rummages thru your car because you left the window down in the parking lot?
this woman needs to find another line of work
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)at her slave wage salary.
If nothing is missing I don't know what the big deal is.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)provided that they don't actually cause any damage?
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)of all the things to worry about, this does not even get on my list.
I worry more about the super rich fucking with me and taking my shit and even my vote, than this woman.
pffft.
FYI you may want to google "identity theft protection".
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)I'm sure there will be another opportunity for that soon.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and none of your analogies are quite applicable, imo...
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Fire her.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)that's normal curiosity...digging through a suitcase should get one fired.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I would rather that someone rummages through my underwear than gets my personal financial information from my laptop.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)who would leave that open on a laptop and just leave the screen up?
Isn't it wiser to get into the habit of always signing off your financial pages so a password is needed to get back in?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)was curiosity...did she try to get onto the computer?
suffragette
(12,232 posts)Out strewn around the room instead of in locked bag.
REP
(21,691 posts)JI7
(89,241 posts)she probably doesn't make much and most people would prefer not to do a job like this.
she didn't steal anything and it does seem like she is just curious . it's not like she was out to cause harm or anything.
i can even understand reporting her and firing her .
but to put it out like this and call on others to publicly shame her is what makes it uncomfortable.
the few times i have stayed at hotels i always kind of assumed they would see what i had. the things i DID NOT want anyone to touch or look at i would just take with me.
i have a relative who is paranoid about this stuff and stayed in a room with her once and she just told them not to clean it until we no longer were staying there. and they were fine with it.
Niko
(97 posts)Who here can HONESTLY say they HAVEN'T snooped on other people's stuff? You never opened a medicine cabinet in your life, ever? Never touched someone else's stuff, ever?
This is natural human curiosity. She didn't steal anything, she didn't break anything. Big fucking whoop. The guy who left a hidden camera to watch people without them knowing, though? That's a HELL of a lot more creepy.
And leaving a bunch of expensive stuff around purposely to "catch" someone looking and touching it is what the police would refer to as entrapment.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Especially when you launch right into the part about snooping in people's medicine cabinets, which, amazing as it may seem to you, is something that it literally has never occurred to me to do.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I assumed housekeeping was checking out my stuff. I'm basically happy if nothing is broken or stolen.
Yeah, its not right to do, but I wouldn't lose sleep over it. No pun intended
Iggo
(47,535 posts)I swear, good help is so hard to come by these days.
kcr
(15,315 posts)She should be flogged at once.
Edited to add just in case because jury