Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnecdote from director's talk in Omaha raises recurring question: Why did we invade Iraq in 2003?
Damn Hollywood liberals!
http://www.omaha.com/news/metro/anecdote-from-director-s-talk-in-omaha-raises-recurring-question/article_8bd64ac4-8ff0-568a-a8de-3f67ce1e4662.html
RYAN SODERLIN/THE WORLD-HERALD
Award-winning director-screenwriters Alexander Payne, left, and David O. Russell talk movies Monday before a live audience of 1,138 at the Holland Performing Arts Center. The discussion between friends raised $327,000 for Film Streams, Omahas nonprofit art house movie theater.
POSTED: THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2014 1:00 AM
By Henry J. Cordes / World-Herald staff writer
During a free-wheeling discussion about movies this week, film director David O. Russell told a large Omaha audience about his meeting with then-presidential candidate George W. Bush in 1999.
I said, Im editing a film questioning your fathers legacy in Iraq, Russell recalled. He said, I think Im going to have to go back there and finish the job.
The anecdote no doubt raised some eyebrows in the audience of 1,100 at the Holland Performing Arts Center. Its a story that seems to support the long-held narrative of many Iraq War opponents: that Bush went to war in Iraq in 2003 to complete his fathers unfinished 1991 Gulf War and remove Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from power.
Its not the first time Russell has told the story. And while it doesnt appear that Bush has ever addressed it specifically, the former president numerous times has denied that his decision on Iraq had anything to do with his fathers earlier Middle East war. He said as much in his just-released biography of his father, George H.W. Bush.
FULL story at link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 814 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anecdote from director's talk in Omaha raises recurring question: Why did we invade Iraq in 2003? (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Nov 2014
OP
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)1. aw, come on - we all knew
why do people keep forgetting the CD that was dropped before 2001 that had plans for selling the war in Iraq? seriously do people have to be told again and act surprised? I never knew why that as not publicized more when it happened, it was in the news and then it was like scrubbed out of the news
Octafish
(55,745 posts)2. Stupit libruls. Everyone knows it's because Saddam attacked us on 9-11.
George W Bush told us, although he wouldn't swear to it.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)3. It wouldn't surprise me if Saddam didn't pilot one of the planes that hit the Towers.
He could have jumped out just before the plane hit. There's a lot of Muslins in NYC so he wouldn't even be noticed.
That's what I think.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)4. Oil, the CIA which is controlled by petroleum companies, Saudi Arabia.
See where the Bush criminal enterprise intersects all three.