General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMary Landrieu says Bernie Sanders willing to help her out...
(private DSCC call).
Now why would Sanders want to sully his progressive bonifides by supporting a Third Way corporatist energy lover? Could it be he's a (gasp!) politician?
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)(private telepathic message)
If Hillary Clinton ends up winning the Democratic nomination in 2016, Bernie Sanders will endorse her. Guaranteed.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I will hold my nose while voting for her against Jeb Bush.
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)to keep things cordial while still trying to move forward progressive policies and move her to the left while trying. It's no different than what he's done with President Obama.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Mischief makers are always out there....
cali
(114,904 posts)and btw, I don't necessarily believe a word out of that thing's mouth. She really is revolting.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I'll be glad if she's gone. She's no help to progressive causes.
brooklynite
(94,360 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)to know that's bullshit. Vague promises of "help" mean very little. Look, this is the world I grew up in. I think I'm as familiar with it as you.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)What you heard was he'd like to "Help her Out of DC"....
Sanders Statement on Keystone XL Pipeline
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
WASHINGTON, Jan. 18 - Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a member of the Senate energy and environment committees, issued the following statement today after the Obama administration rejected a permit for TransCanada to build an oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico:
"The president made the correct decision today in rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline, and I will fight to ensure Congress does not overturn the decision.
"The United States must help lead the world in combating global warming and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It would be incomprehensible to give approval to a tar sands oil project when producing tar sands oil creates 82 percent more carbon emissions than conventional oil, and when it poses the risk of extremely damaging oil spills. I agree with NASA scientist James Hansen who has stated that fully exploiting the tar sands would mean game over' for our efforts to reverse global warming.
"If we are serious about protecting the planet and improving our economy, America's energy future must focus on energy efficiency and renewable energy. We know that by improving the fuel efficiency of our cars and trucks to 54.5 miles per gallon, an easily achievable accomplishment, we can save up to three times more oil per day than Keystone XL would carry.
"In my view, this tar sands pipeline is a bad deal for the country and for our planet, and the president has acted in the best interest of the American people in saying no to Keystone XL."
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-statement-on-keystone-xl-pipeline
------------
Sanders Statement on Keystone XL Pipeline
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
WASHINGTON, Jan. 18 - Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a member of the Senate energy and environment committees, issued the following statement today after the Obama administration rejected a permit for TransCanada to build an oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico:
"The president made the correct decision today in rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline, and I will fight to ensure Congress does not overturn the decision.
"The United States must help lead the world in combating global warming and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It would be incomprehensible to give approval to a tar sands oil project when producing tar sands oil creates 82 percent more carbon emissions than conventional oil, and when it poses the risk of extremely damaging oil spills. I agree with NASA scientist James Hansen who has stated that fully exploiting the tar sands would mean game over' for our efforts to reverse global warming.
"If we are serious about protecting the planet and improving our economy, America's energy future must focus on energy efficiency and renewable energy. We know that by improving the fuel efficiency of our cars and trucks to 54.5 miles per gallon, an easily achievable accomplishment, we can save up to three times more oil per day than Keystone XL would carry.
"In my view, this tar sands pipeline is a bad deal for the country and for our planet, and the president has acted in the best interest of the American people in saying no to Keystone XL."
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-statement-on-keystone-xl-pipeline
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Thanks, KoKo.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)Landrieu does more damage than good to the party.
She will not be missed. She will get even fewer votes this time.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)deaniac21
(6,747 posts)would be much help that far south.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)a DINO try and ride the coattail of a liberal. LOL
PAProgressive28
(270 posts)Bernie might help out a Democrat. Therefore everyone shut up and vote for Hillary.
CityDem
(1,103 posts)Mary Landrieu is absolutely toast. Put a fork in her this party in over.
Old Nick
(468 posts)They're going to boot her anyway!