Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 03:45 PM Nov 2014

Screw the states that did not expand Medicaid and the SCOTUS for enabling them to screw the poor.

The ACA would have required that all states expand Medicaid. The SCOTUS intervened, giving Red states permission to deny health care to the poor, and then a whole lot of Red state politicians (the ones who salivate over federal road money and military money and funds for bridges to nowhere) decided that they would forgo billions of dollars in funds in order to screw the poor. I don't recall reading any portion of the ACA that says "And poor folks don't get anything, because they are poor."

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Screw the states that did not expand Medicaid and the SCOTUS for enabling them to screw the poor. (Original Post) McCamy Taylor Nov 2014 OP
In addition to the SCOTUS, blame should also be assigned to voters in those red states Cali_Democrat Nov 2014 #1
But not all of them, unless the vote was unanimous. n/t eShirl Nov 2014 #3
and sorry to say DonCoquixote Nov 2014 #2
But...but...no one inspired me moondust Nov 2014 #17
but yet a story about alaska taxing churches which will hurt the poor of that area has some belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #4
You obviously know very little about Alaska Bandit Nov 2014 #9
Tax exemptions aren't subsidies. Subsidies are subsidies. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #12
Investopedia believes they are KT2000 Nov 2014 #15
Not making someone pay taxes SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #16
And the dictionary says Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #18
and KT2000 Nov 2014 #19
Then you're saying the government subsidizes -- Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #20
Boeing threatened to leave KT2000 Nov 2014 #21
I shop at stores that charge lower prices but the store isn't paying me to shop there. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #22
an exception to the law KT2000 Nov 2014 #23
If WA state decided their tax rates were more of a revenue liability than a benefit they Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #24
And if they left you would have unemployment, and less income tax that employees pay Travis_0004 Nov 2014 #45
Many of us KT2000 Nov 2014 #46
i guess that big tax break the gov gave makes the war on the poor there ok belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #13
Agree, but blame also Democrats for having written a sloppy law that gives a floor to subsidies. Mass Nov 2014 #5
Thank you, yes they do deserve part of that blame Autumn Nov 2014 #6
there WAS the SCOTUS screwwed that pooch! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #26
Hi, nice to see you. Autumn Nov 2014 #28
and? You would rather be allowed to say untruths on DU? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #29
Hi, nice to see you. Autumn Nov 2014 #30
Okay so you agree that you are spreading Untruths on DU... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #31
Hi, nice to see you. Autumn Nov 2014 #32
I am good with you admitting you are trolling DU spreading lies about the ACA.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #33
Hi, nice to see you Autumn Nov 2014 #35
and believe me as long as you spread false information about the ACA....YOU WILL be seeing me again VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #36
Hi, nice to see you Autumn Nov 2014 #37
... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #38
Ironically that sloppiness may be the thing that ends up saving the mandates at the court Rstrstx Nov 2014 #7
sloppiness my Aunt Fannie! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #27
What on earth are you talking about? Rstrstx Nov 2014 #39
Where in the name of all that is holy....does it say there what YOU said? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #40
Let me explain it to you Rstrstx Nov 2014 #41
But they didn't and they voted against the ACA......sorry Redstates...but that IS a fact. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #42
Of course it makes sense Rstrstx Nov 2014 #43
its got everything to do with it..... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #44
Thanks Melurkyoulongtime Nov 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Nov 2014 #10
Yay! Fuck Americans! progressoid Nov 2014 #11
hold on now it's ok see as it was explained to me belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #14
our reTHUG republican governor bill haslam said 'fuck the poor' and they re-elected him spanone Nov 2014 #25
unfortunately hfojvt Nov 2014 #34
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
1. In addition to the SCOTUS, blame should also be assigned to voters in those red states
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 03:46 PM
Nov 2014

They vote for the politicians screwing them over.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
2. and sorry to say
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 03:48 PM
Nov 2014

as BAD, I mean TRULY BAD
I mean AWFUL
choices as we were offered in states like Florida and Kentucky.

Bad, as in
Debbie Wasserman Schulz needs to either leave her office, or get thrown out!

Still, for all the people who sat home and did a protest vote,
it made a difference
as milliuons of poor people in those states will be screwed

Yes, I meant that at those who are sipping Cappucino at the Starbucks
thinking that "if we don't vote, that will show em!"

moondust

(19,972 posts)
17. But...but...no one inspired me
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:19 PM
Nov 2014

to get off my big fat ass and go vote, in some cases just mail in a ballot.

"But I didn't get my pony."




Okay, to be fair, it may not make much difference who votes in some of these red states if their elections are rigged anyway. Any state engaged in voter suppression of any kind should not be trusted to produce honest election results.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
4. but yet a story about alaska taxing churches which will hurt the poor of that area has some
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:21 PM
Nov 2014

people of du very excited.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
9. You obviously know very little about Alaska
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:33 PM
Nov 2014

Things are not done in a vacuum. The people of Nome, including the "poor" are well aware of the situation in and around Nome and they interact with the people they have elected to govern their community every single day. The Governor of Alaska got a bill passed to give the Oil Industry a two billion dollar tax break. Since that happened EVERY single community has been scrambling to find a way to raise revenues, and most of those ways are last resorts, like raising taxes on Seniors or Hospitals or yes even Churches.. The Wealthiest Industry on the Face of the Earth.. EVER.. has to have a Government subsidy so they can do what made them the wealthiest Industry on the Face of the Earth. Because of that people are suffering especially the poor. If you need an injustice to rail against maybe you could consider that.

KT2000

(20,576 posts)
15. Investopedia believes they are
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:11 PM
Nov 2014

DEFINITION of 'Subsidy'

A benefit given by the government to groups or individuals usually in the form of a cash payment or tax reduction. The subsidy is usually given to remove some type of burden and is often considered to be in the interest of the public.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
18. And the dictionary says
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:20 PM
Nov 2014

noun: subsidy · plural noun: subsidies

1.a sum of money granted by the government or a public body to assist an industry or business so that the price of a commodity or service may remain low or competitive:

"a farm subsidy"

KT2000

(20,576 posts)
19. and
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 07:09 PM
Nov 2014

subsidy noun (Concise Encyclopedia)

Financial assistance, either through direct payments or through indirect means such as price cuts and favourable contracts, to a person or group in order to promote a public objective. Subsidies to transportation, housing, agriculture, mining, and other industries have been instituted on the grounds that their preservation or expansion is in the public interest. Subsidies to the arts, sciences, humanities, and religion also exist in many nations where the private economy is unable to support them. Examples of direct subsidies include payments in cash or in kind, while more-indirect subsidies include governmental provision of goods or services at prices below the normal market price, governmental purchase of goods or services at prices above the market price, and tax concessions. Although subsidies exist to promote the public welfare, they result in either higher taxes or higher prices for consumer goods. Some subsidies, such as protective tariffs, may also encourage the preservation of inefficient producers. A subsidy is desirable only if its effects increase total benefits more than total costs (see cost-benefit analysis).

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
20. Then you're saying the government subsidizes --
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 07:35 PM
Nov 2014

The lower tax brackets, newspapers, political speech, charity work, donations, voting, etc.

To claim not taxing a thing is the same as subsidizing it is to claim all money first belongs to the government. It does not. It belongs to the people who engage in economic activity and the government -- through the consent of the people (hopefully) -- volunteer a portion of their economic gain for the sake of facility the safeguards of their communities.

KT2000

(20,576 posts)
21. Boeing threatened to leave
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 08:58 PM
Nov 2014

Washington if they did not get concessions from the state and the union. The state relieved them of paying the amount of tax they would owe the state, according to the law. The taxpayers are now going to pay for all of their tax supported needs - roads, infrastructure, agencies in place to take care of employee needs, schools etc. I call that a subsidy. Their federal taxes are also zero as a result of loopholes.

And - English is a living language.

KT2000

(20,576 posts)
23. an exception to the law
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:07 PM
Nov 2014

was made to offer an incentive. that is not the same as a sale at a store since they are not guided by law whereas tax rates are.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
24. If WA state decided their tax rates were more of a revenue liability than a benefit they
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:23 PM
Nov 2014

made a choice. I'm sure the stores I shop at would prefer to charge me as much as possible but they have to compete.

I actually avoid the main metropolitan area because the sales taxes are significantly higher than the surrounding cities. No, really; it's stupid. The taxes are +40% in the big city. Add in the traffic cameras with the ridiculously short yellow lights and the hassle of navigating a large city and it just isn't worth it. I'm sure I'm not alone and can only wonder how much revenue is being lost.

Yet, those outlying cities where I shop are not subsidizing me.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
45. And if they left you would have unemployment, and less income tax that employees pay
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:59 PM
Nov 2014

I would have to asssume Washington did the math and decided that they were better off keeping boeing.

KT2000

(20,576 posts)
46. Many of us
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 01:14 AM
Nov 2014

are sick of being blackmailed by Boeing and would like to see the state stand up to them. The state determined that this tax cut would be made up in cuts to state spending across the board. Hiring freezes and reduced hours for state workers and reduced services for the taxpayers - that includes safety and health agencies.

just and fyi: We don't have income tax in this state.

There is more than math to these decisions. But such blackmail is occurring across this country.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
13. i guess that big tax break the gov gave makes the war on the poor there ok
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:08 PM
Nov 2014

damn poor they should have stopped that governor. did the governor tell the people of alaska that he was going to do this before they voted for him. my guess is no but it doesnt matter cause we're taxing churches finally.

Should five percent appear too small
Be thankful I don't take it all
'Cause I'm the taxman
Yeah, I'm the taxman

(If you drive a car, car)
I'll tax the street
(If you try to sit, sit)
I'll tax your seat
(If you get too cold, cold)
I'll tax the heat
(If you take a walk, walk)
I'll tax your feet
(Taxman)

'Cause I'm the taxman
Yeah, I'm the taxman

Don't ask me what I want it for
If you don't want to pay some more
'Cause I'm the taxman
Yeah, I'm the taxman

Now my advice for those who die
Declare the pennies on your eyes
'Cause I'm the taxman
Yeah, I'm the taxman
And you're working for no one but me

Mass

(27,315 posts)
5. Agree, but blame also Democrats for having written a sloppy law that gives a floor to subsidies.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:21 PM
Nov 2014

had them not written explicitly the % in the law, we may have been in a better place (as with these subsidies for state exchanges that is going to the Supreme Court).

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
6. Thank you, yes they do deserve part of that blame
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:25 PM
Nov 2014

there should have been a workaround written into the law.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. and believe me as long as you spread false information about the ACA....YOU WILL be seeing me again
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:44 PM
Nov 2014

and again!



Your latest appears to be agreeing with a zenophobe....

Rstrstx

(1,399 posts)
7. Ironically that sloppiness may be the thing that ends up saving the mandates at the court
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:30 PM
Nov 2014

Court precedence has established that laws which withhold funds from a state do so unambiguously, and it must be clearly explained what will happen to those states if they don't accept such funds. Obviously this wasn't done.

But I'm with you, there shouldn't have been a requirement that stops people earning below the FPL to get a subsidy, like it does to resident aliens who aren't eligible for medicaid. It would have been a partial safeguard against states that didn't expand medicaid.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
27. sloppiness my Aunt Fannie!
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:34 PM
Nov 2014

The SCOTUS took out the mandatory part.....and gave Red States their out...


And you have YET to prove that little xenophobic sounding part...

Rstrstx

(1,399 posts)
39. What on earth are you talking about?
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:55 PM
Nov 2014

I gave you the text directly from the ACA is this post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5829964

And I certainly had no intent of meaning for it to be xenophobic, I was merely pointing out that it's a shame non-citizens can get tax credits even if they don't make 100% of the FPL while U.S. citizens are required to earn 100% to get a subsidy. I have no problem with non-citizens getting the credit, capiche?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
40. Where in the name of all that is holy....does it say there what YOU said?
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:56 PM
Nov 2014

it says nothing of the sort....its just your weird xenophobic interpretation of it...

Rstrstx

(1,399 posts)
41. Let me explain it to you
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:19 PM
Nov 2014

These were my original comments:

(One thing that frustrates me about the law) is that it lets legal aliens who make less than 100% of the FPL (Federal Poverty Line) use the Exchange as if they made 100% of the FPL but if you're a U.S. citizen who makes one penny less than the FPL you're screwed if don't live in a state that expanded Medicaid. I can see the reasoning, I'm assuming resident aliens may not have qualified for Medicaid, but still it grates me.


When I researched it more I see that the reason for letting them use the exchange was exactly that: if you're a legal resident here in the U.S. but haven't been here for a required period of time you are not eligible for Medicaid and therefore would be left out in the cold as far as getting affordable health insurance, that's why they included this passage.

Now what I was trying to say is that I wish U.S. citizens should have had the same opportunity of being able to participate in the exchanges if they earned less than 100% of the poverty level the same way the non-citizens who aren't eligible for medicaid can do. It would have been a sort of "Plan B" for residents in the states that didn't expand medicaid to be able to purchase affordable insurance, sort of the way the federal exchange was to be Plan B for states that didn't establish their own exchange.

I never suggested non-citizens shouldn't get subsidies, I was just bemoaning the fact U.S. citizens can't if they're too poor for the exchanges.

Does it make more sense now?
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
42. But they didn't and they voted against the ACA......sorry Redstates...but that IS a fact.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:26 PM
Nov 2014

elections have consequences....

Does that make sense to YOU now?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
44. its got everything to do with it.....
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:39 PM
Nov 2014

they would have expanded Medicaid...but apparently and unfortunately Red states don't want it...

Melurkyoulongtime

(136 posts)
8. Thanks
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:33 PM
Nov 2014

I'm in one of those states (TX) and desperately NEED life-saving medical right now - and can't get it. I'm awaiting an indigent care application but the level of bullshit we poor have to put up with here is just staggering. They run you through the ringer in this state if you're poor and yes, they hope you die before they waste any precious "resources" on your poor ass. The messed up thing is even if you worked all the time prior to just ONE medical issue you can end up poor, homeless and indigent like I did even though you did everything "right" and were a productive member of society before having medical problems. FUCK THIS STATE AND EVERY ONE OF THE REST THAT DENIED US SIMPLY DUE TO POVERTY. FUCK THEM ALL.

Response to McCamy Taylor (Original post)

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
14. hold on now it's ok see as it was explained to me
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:09 PM
Nov 2014

Bandit (21,099 posts)
9. You obviously know very little about Alaska

Things are not done in a vacuum. The people of Nome, including the "poor" are well aware of the situation in and around Nome and they interact with the people they have elected to govern their community every single day. The Governor of Alaska got a bill passed to give the Oil Industry a two billion dollar tax break. Since that happened EVERY single community has been scrambling to find a way to raise revenues, and most of those ways are last resorts, like raising taxes on Seniors or Hospitals or yes even Churches.. The Wealthiest Industry on the Face of the Earth.. EVER.. has to have a Government subsidy so they can do what made them the wealthiest Industry on the Face of the Earth. Because of that people are suffering especially the poor. If you need an injustice to rail against maybe you could consider that.

so see it's all ok

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Screw the states that did...