Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:08 PM Nov 2014

Hillary is a "soulless, principle-free, power-hungry veteran of DC’s game of thrones"

So sayeth Glenn Greenwald...Well, I guess if anyone would know it's ol' Glenn, since he is quick to recognize his own kind...

So is this supposed to be the "fearless" journalism, or the "adversarial" journalism? Someone please help me out...

https://twitter.com/the_intercept/status/533308901564121088

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary is a "soulless, principle-free, power-hungry veteran of DC’s game of thrones" (Original Post) Blue_Tires Nov 2014 OP
Um, Game of Thrones is fiction. 6000eliot Nov 2014 #1
So is American politics. Kablooie Nov 2014 #3
Thread win! Rex Nov 2014 #4
I saw what you did there. Autumn Nov 2014 #5
So Greenwald has on opinion. Nothing more, nothing less. 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #2
What if Jeb Bush runs Andy823 Nov 2014 #6
Greenwald on Democracy Now for Impeaching GW Bush 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #20
I just find it interesting comparing who he chooses to speak out about Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #10
Are you claiming that he's never criticized Republicans? Marr Nov 2014 #26
Sounds like she'll be good for bidness BeyondGeography Nov 2014 #7
In other words she's a perfect corporatist candidate for POTUS. hifiguy Nov 2014 #8
So even though he's right it's the pot calling the kettle black, then Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #12
Of course GG is not running for prez elias49 Nov 2014 #18
True, but GG is someone of considerable influence Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #24
Yes. But, Goldman Sachs is happy to pay her for it. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #9
The Rand Paulite Glenn Greenwald? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2014 #11
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #22
If that is how you feel, then you need to get active and find someone who can beat her liberal N proud Nov 2014 #13
Methinks you haven't looked at the 2016 electoral map. jeff47 Nov 2014 #15
Been recommending that path to the JoePhilly Nov 2014 #16
What's his view of the GOP field? JoePhilly Nov 2014 #14
And go after HIS corporate masters? leftynyc Nov 2014 #17
I thought he was a 'journalist.' That's pure punditry. nt onehandle Nov 2014 #19
Aw, it's craving attention again. Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #21
"soulless, principle-free, power-hungry" sounds like something Rush would call her. pampango Nov 2014 #23
"They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing." Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #25
Update -- The same day Greenwald was writing this Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #27
I think she has a very strong record, and a good core of Democratic principles bhikkhu Nov 2014 #28
I don't like either of them davidpdx Nov 2014 #29
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
2. So Greenwald has on opinion. Nothing more, nothing less.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:14 PM
Nov 2014

so what?

Should he be "forbidden" to speak out against a Clinton Dynasty?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
10. I just find it interesting comparing who he chooses to speak out about
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:23 PM
Nov 2014

and those who he never, ever criticizes...

And I've always had an issue personally with Greenwald stuffing in so many opinion pieces into a $50 million blog which supposed to be about hard news and investigative reporting...From a professional standpoint, I'd just as soon not see the two jumbled together on one page...

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
8. In other words she's a perfect corporatist candidate for POTUS.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:21 PM
Nov 2014

That is old news, though Greenwald is eminently correct.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
12. So even though he's right it's the pot calling the kettle black, then
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:25 PM
Nov 2014

It hasn't been any big secret which corporate players are pulling GG's strings...

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
24. True, but GG is someone of considerable influence
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 06:09 PM
Nov 2014

if DU is any indication, and I'm hard-pressed to remember any harsh columns he'd have written about her back when she was SoS or running for office in '08...I also have a sneaking suspicion that GG won't be anywhere near as critical towards other presidential candidates...

Nevermind the fact that even if she wins, Hillary is more than two full years away from even taking office, and longer than that before she's able to implement any policy...And since he no longer lives in the U.S., I'm not sure how any of Hillary's as-yet-unnamed policies in her yet-to-be-won presidency would affect his daily life...

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,741 posts)
11. The Rand Paulite Glenn Greenwald?
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:23 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Tue Nov 18, 2014, 04:19 PM - Edit history (1)

Yes Rand Paul is the guy Greenwald's been pushing.

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Reply #11)

liberal N proud

(60,332 posts)
13. If that is how you feel, then you need to get active and find someone who can beat her
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:27 PM
Nov 2014

Someone who can beat her in the primaries and then turn around and beat whoever the pukes put on their ballot.

Right now Hillary can beat any puke with the potential to run. Keeping the pukes from having all 3 branches of the government is a priority.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
15. Methinks you haven't looked at the 2016 electoral map.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:37 PM
Nov 2014

Democrats need 1 "purple" state to get to 270.

Republicans need to run all 9 "purple" states, and flip one "blue" state.

It's not going to be difficult for the Democrat to win. But I'm sure Clinton could find a way to Coakley it up. After all, she was just as much an inevitable force in 2008. Even after she started losing primaries.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
14. What's his view of the GOP field?
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 05:36 PM
Nov 2014

Does he have little to say on that topic or is it just that no one here post his screeds about the GOP?

pampango

(24,692 posts)
23. "soulless, principle-free, power-hungry" sounds like something Rush would call her.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 06:06 PM
Nov 2014

We can have other candidates we support without going that far with respect to Hillary. The whole "my opponent is the most evil person to ever walk the face of the earth" mentality is pea-brain right-wing thinking.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
25. "They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing."
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 03:53 PM
Nov 2014
Hillary is banal, corrupted, drained of vibrancy and passion. I mean, she’s been around forever, the Clinton circle. She’s a fucking hawk and like a neocon, practically. She’s surrounded by all these sleazy money types who are just corrupting everything everywhere. But she’s going to be the first female president, and women in America are going to be completely invested in her candidacy. Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic, like opposition to Obama has been depicted as racist. It’s going to be this completely symbolic messaging that’s going to overshadow the fact that she’ll do nothing but continue everything in pursuit of her own power. They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing.

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2014/05/12/glenn-greenwald-on-the-2016-elections-theyll-probably-have-a-gay-person-after-hillary/

I present your hero, ladies and gentlemen...

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
27. Update -- The same day Greenwald was writing this
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:33 AM
Nov 2014

He made a new hire at the intercept of Sharon Freaking Weinberger(!), a not-quite-reformed MIC shill...

bhikkhu

(10,711 posts)
28. I think she has a very strong record, and a good core of Democratic principles
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:04 AM
Nov 2014

Just to disagree. Her record is public knowledge.

Anyone with specifics to refute it, rather than the same vague slander we could hear any day, and time, from hate radio and the teabaggers on the right?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary is a "soulle...