BREAKING: 9th Circuit (Bogusly) Dismisses HAAS v ROMNEY Racketeering Case
It ain't easy taking down big sleazies. Especially when the United States Government's employees, who swore an oath to protect the Constitution of the United States, believe such is secondary to brown nosing Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney organized crimes. Even judges can't deal with the facts and avoid them at all costs.
A ruling, without details, is simply arbitrariness, in a capricious manner, stating - THEY be big and you be too small; hence No chance at all! The problem the judges have, is the facts are so overwhelming, THEY must make sure such never sees (official) light of day. They can never allow our case to go to trial. So they continue to violate the Law/due process; and make up crap as they go - to protect Romney and his gang.
9th Circuit (bogus) shut down of HAAS v ROMNEY (for Racketeering)
The ruling (here) states the following;
A review of the record and the responses to this court's August 21, 2014 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as to not require further argument. See United States v Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED
[br][hr][br]
Why they had to rush and shut it down, is because I've been getting more attention lately. When they ordered me to come up with $505.00 (provided - by the way - at the generosity of several die-hard Repubs) and file a "Show Cause" reponse; then Romney and his gang also replied and LIED. When I put in a September 30, 2014 Objection to their attorneys lying and also testifying (a counsel can't make statements as if they are facts - without supplication of evidence 1st);
guess what - NO ONE responded!
Now I must ask the court to rehear the issue (and try) to force them to address the facts. One reporter, made a quaint remark about what the judges said of the bogus remark that my case is "insubstantial"!
The reporter said "What do you need, for Romney to mug you in front of the judges bench"?
Bet'cha that - even in that case - they would let Mitt "retroactively" retire from the crime.
Here's the link to the judge's Order
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_dismiss_haas_v_romney.pdf
This is a link to the docket (so you can see the timelines etc)
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_docket_summary_haas_v_romney.pdf
And this is a link to the particular case of U.S. v Hooton - that the judges cited
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_us_vhooton_1982.pdf
As the picture above (provided by artist D'Antuono who also sells Shirts of his "Too Big to Jail" pic - {HERE}) it is well accepted as axiomatic - that you simply beat City Hall (or those as powerful as).
Be that as it may, I find myself miffed; but undaunted in the quest for justice. Simply have too much evidence (including confessions) and no babbling, banter bull chit by those on bended knees before the lords of Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Willard Mitt Romney - will stop me.
They will - once a decent public servant comes forth - rue the day they lined themselves with iniquity!
[br][hr][br]
Mitt has a big smile on his face now; but there will come a day when people will stop protecting him.
Supreme Court of the United States - Here We Come!
[br][hr][br]
UPDATE - for those who care about the FACTS.
[br]
But NOT impossible.
= new reply since forum marked as read
It ain't over until the fat lady sings!
This is so cool - Gonna take some time - so be patient.
But it is really (REALLY) cool news.
