Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would the Emancipation Proclamation qualify as an Executive Order? (Original Post) Pryderi Nov 2014 OP
I think it was. nt kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #1
'a war measure' elleng Nov 2014 #2
It was done under Lincoln's authority as Commander-in-Chief csziggy Nov 2014 #3
Also he arrested people without Habeus Corpus by executive order. gordianot Nov 2014 #4
Because Congress was adjourned MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #5
Quite Homeland Securityish of them. They also hung entire juries for bad verdicts in those days. gordianot Nov 2014 #6

elleng

(130,876 posts)
2. 'a war measure'
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:25 AM
Nov 2014

It proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten states that were still in rebellion,[2] excluding areas controlled by the Union and thus applying to 3 million of the 4 million slaves in the U.S. at the time. The Proclamation was based on the president's constitutional authority as commander in chief of the armed forces;[3] it was not a law passed by Congress. The Proclamation also ordered that suitable persons among those freed could be enrolled into the paid service of United States' forces, and ordered the Union Army (and all segments of the Executive branch) to "recognize and maintain the freedom of" the ex-slaves. The Proclamation did not compensate the owners, did not outlaw slavery, and did not grant citizenship to the ex-slaves (called freedmen). It made the eradication of slavery an explicit war goal, in addition to the goal of reuniting the Union.[4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclamation

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
3. It was done under Lincoln's authority as Commander-in-Chief
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:29 AM
Nov 2014

The fourth paragraph of the proclamation explains that Lincoln issued it, "by virtue of the power in me vested as Commander-in-Chief, of the Army and Navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclamation#Drafting_and_issuance_of_the_proclamation

That is why Lincoln had to push for the Thirteenth Amendment - so it would be law after the war was over. Also, the Emacipation Proclamation exempted certain states from having the slaves there freed. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in the entire United States:

Acting under presidential war powers, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, which proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten states that were still in rebellion.[10] However, it did not affect the status of slaves in the border states that had remained loyal to the Union.[11] That December, Lincoln again used his war powers and issued a "Proclamation for Amnesty and Reconstruction", which offered Southern states a chance to peacefully rejoin the Union if they abolished slavery and collected loyalty oaths from 10% of their voting population.[12] Southern states did not readily accept the deal, and the status of slavery remained uncertain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Crafting_the_amendment
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
5. Because Congress was adjourned
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:03 AM
Nov 2014

IIRC, Congress voted on it as soon as they could once they were back in town, and agreed with Lincoln.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
6. Quite Homeland Securityish of them. They also hung entire juries for bad verdicts in those days.
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:09 AM
Nov 2014

In very short order.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would the Emancipation Pr...