Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow to Follow Our Weird Politics - Michael Tomasky
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/may/10/how-follow-our-weird-politics/For many years, specialists in universities believed that American political events could be explained by the methods of economics and political science. The recent lackluster jobs report, for example, showing just 120,000 private-sector jobs added in March, is precisely the sort of fact that these experts would find explanatory. They assumed that party politics didnt really matter that muchthat when it came, for example, to making decisions about economic policy, politicians of both parties, though they would disagree on some fundamental questions, acted rationally, listening to the views of their respective economic experts and attempting to carry out their recommendations in as much good faith as the sausage-making processes of party politics would allow.
It took them a while, but that view has begun to change. Now, the components of politicseverything from ideology to the influence of money to overbearing egos and hostile personal relations, all the matters that have for decades consumed the political press but been of less interest to the academyare understood to drive the action. Or at least acknowledged as factors. The influential books along these lines include Jacob Hacker and Paul Piersons Off Center of 2005, in which the writerspolitical scientistsdescribed the process by which a comparatively small and radical Republican group of lawmakers and their benefactors had moved the country so far to the right. Two years later, in The Conscience of a Liberal, Paul Krugman admitted that hed been wrong all these years in putting economic explanations before political ones. Considering inequality, for example, he wrote that hed been coming to conclude that mere economic explanations for it no longer sufficed:
***
So here we are, a century and a half after Marx, living with the effects of George W. Bush, Karl Rove, and Dick Cheneyand more recently, Sarah Palin, the Tea Party movement, and a group of Republican presidential candidates willing to make assertions like Rick Perrys lament that in Barack Obamas America our kids cant openly celebrate Christmas.3 Social scientists are flipping the old base-superstructure relation on its head and acknowledging that politicians are not rational decision-makers, and that politics drives economics, not the other way around.
***
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1005 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How to Follow Our Weird Politics - Michael Tomasky (Original Post)
ashling
Apr 2012
OP
saras
(6,670 posts)1. I'm not convinced they're right in the big picture.
I think that
the fact that they are right about our politics now
and
the fact that our political system currently seems to be broken
are closely related.