General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFive companies stockpiled nearly $60 billion while cutting 64,000 jobs worldwide from 2007 to 2011
SAT APR 21, 2012 AT 12:30 PM PDT
Five companies stockpiled nearly $60 billion while cutting 64,000 jobs worldwide from 2007 to 2011
byLaura Clawson
Reposted from Daily Kos Labor by Laura Clawson
One frequently cited rationale for corporate tax breaks is that companies will use the extra money to create jobs. They'd love to create jobs, we're told, if only they could afford to do so, and one more tax break will make that possible. Instead, we see that many companies are sitting on giant piles of cash and cutting jobs anyway. The AFL-CIO's Paywatch includes some data on major corporate cash hoardersfive companies that added $57.8 billion to their cash stockpiles between 2007 and 2011 while cutting more than 64,000 jobs worldwide. (We can't know how many of those jobs were in the United States, because companies aren't required to tell us that.)
Verizon, which leads the pack, having cut 41,100 jobs while its "cash holdings and short-term investments grew 311 percent to $14 billion at the end of 2011, from $3.4 billion at the end of 2007," is also a major corporate tax avoider. Verizon paid a negative effective federal income tax rate from 2008 to 2011 while chasing after more and more tax breaks and trying to force its unionized workers into taking cuts to health care and benefits and job security.
Verizon may be the worst, cutting jobs, trying to make jobs worse, and accumulating a Scrooge McDuck-style cash hoard, but it's not just Verizon. Nonfinancial corporate businesses had $2.2 trillion in liquid assets at the end of 2011, and the fact that they're just sitting on that is hurting the American economy:
more...
http://dailykos.com/
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)rights that obviously supersede ours.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)It all started with Reagan's "Trickle Down," some 30 years ago.
Cut taxes on the rich and they'll use them to "reinvest" in America!
Bush's tax cuts 10 years ago were supposed to do the same. They didn't.
It was all a lie and it's amazing they're still using the "tax cuts will create jobs" horseshit today!
exactly true, all of it and it just burns me
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Corporations never had any intentions of raising wages to match the cost of living. That'd mean "less money at the top". So "tax cuts" was the substitute and the drooling idiot public bought it, not knowing their dollar's buying power (along with the job market) went south.
Everyone should read "The Great Risk Shift" by Jacob S. Hacker. The Reaganite GOP's minions/handlers KILLED this country's prosperity.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Initech
(100,042 posts)lpbk2713
(42,740 posts)Apparently they discontinued anything that might have ever resembled customer service.
"Got a problem. Tough shit. Try to find someone who cares."
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Surely you're not asserting that American workers can afford their ever-rising cost of living with their 30-year stagnant real wage?
Are you equating legalized theft with capitalism?
Do CEOs deserve lotteries every year?
And why are you still here, again? Nothing you post regarding economics even resembles "Democrat", let alone "progressive".
Response to HughBeaumont (Reply #19)
Post removed
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Don't flatter yourself. Some of us have better memories than others.
Response to HughBeaumont (Reply #23)
Post removed
Some of us do keep score on who the economic sell-outs of the American public, American worker, liberal values and Democratic platform are.
Better memories, yes; longer memories too.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)just a couple of days ago you reminded us of your political positions when you complained about families' getting tax refunds when you had to pay.
see the thing is, most of us are fairly liberal on most (not all issues), so when people *frequently* post conservative ideas, it really stands out, because most of us take conservative positions only rarely, if at all.
if you were just a run of the mill liberal like most of us, you wouldn't get noticed, because you wouldn't stand out.
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)Families deserve every tax credit they can get, huh, all in the name of family values. Make sure they hear you, you should post it again. I mean our country was founded on family values, right? LOL
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)almost.
flvegan
(64,406 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Comedy GOLD!
marshall gaines
(347 posts)Profit before people, always the capitalist way.
juajen
(8,515 posts)If Romney wins they can then throw all of this cash out there, create jobs and the pugs look great. They should be called traitors, for that is just what they are. Ditto all of the ones who throw their cash to China, then moan about how much money we owe China. Of course, the truth is that the deficit is owed mostly to Americans not China. I believe the last time I looked at a chart, it said we owed about 1.8 Trillion to China, some to Japan, and maybe one other country, but the bulk is owed to Americans, you know like our Social Security Trust Fund, Medicare Premiums, and treasury bonds. I am sick of liars and thieves.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)They want to be able to buy their own stock to prevent a takeover.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)mwooldri
(10,301 posts)Too many companies have the Scrooge McDuck approach these days.
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)so that Obama would do poorly and then a Rethug would win and lower Corporate taxes and lessen restrictions. All they had to do was fire people etc and pocket the money and profits to use in the next election to defeat Obama.
rgbecker
(4,820 posts)They could keep all 41,100 on for five years at a $52,000/yr salary and benefit package.
But why bother. The GOP never explained why the "Job Creators" create jobs. Most do only if they can make a buck off each and every working stiff.
allan01
(1,950 posts)hem. without us there is no them. also am rather mad that the buffet rule was fillabustered . meh if we did that , the repugs would be screaming the nuke option. more money for their contributers buh