General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFemale lawmakers in Montana told to check skirt lengths, necklines
(Reuters) - A new dress code for the Montana House of Representatives that bans jeans and warns women to watch skirt lengths and necklines has drawn the ire of female lawmakers, who say it suggests they cannot independently decide what attire is appropriate.
The wardrobe code was enacted by male leaders of the Republican-controlled House in advance of a legislative session that begins on Jan. 5. Most members of the chamber's Democratic minority are women, who say they were not consulted about new rules that target them for apparel infractions.
SNIP
It prohibits female legislators from wearing items like leggings and open-toed sandals, and cautions them to "be sensitive to skirt lengths and necklines."
SNIP
"The code crosses a line. It singles women out for admonishment and suggests they can't be trusted to get up in the morning and dress appropriately," said the Democrat from the state capital, Helena.
Suich
(10,642 posts)Get out your burqas...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban_treatment_of_women
merrily
(45,251 posts)legal rights they should or should not have.
Cavemen (supposedly). The priests of the OT, the apostle Paul (who never so much as met Jesus except as a ""vision" on the road to Damascus), the Church, government, the Framers, the SCOTUS, state licensing boards. You name it, they all knew better. The only explanation I have is that men were hard-wired to be terrified of women.
Where, oh, where would we poor silly women be without them? Why, the very thought makes me woozy. Anyone seen my smelling salts?
Orrex
(63,203 posts)If you're going to faint, I certainly hope that you have the basic decency to wear something appropriate and tasteful as you collapse.
ProfessorGAC
(65,000 posts)Merrily and Orrex win this thread.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I wouldn't want to force some poor helpless man to become overwhelmed at the sight of my ankle.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I'd suggest that all the female legislators band together and wear burqa-like or old-fashioned nun-like garb.
This admission of the males' absolute inability to control their lustful urges in the presence of female attractiveness consistently leads to such regulation anyway.
The women might as well get the jump on it them and take the men's regulatory trend right now to where it's ultimately heading.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)It would send a powerful message to sane people even if it might be lost on the Montaliban.
TexasTowelie
(112,128 posts)Let the women go topless so that there is no need to worry about the neckline and it will also promote gender equality.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)that some women's attire can be distracting to men in a business setting. And that some women make what are obvious "mistakes" (we've all seen them--the neckline that reveals all when she bends over, the tight skirt that keeps riding up etc etc)...
But deal with it --other than issuing edicts and high school level dress codes. I have no patience for this--it's clearly an elbow check to women professionals in the way it's done here. FFS just tell your colleague directly--"Janet, you're showing too much skin (often)and it's bothering some people (often)." If she doesn't take the hint, chalk it up to tramp style and let her have her little reputation.
Lochloosa
(16,063 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Your post is actually offensive.
"Tramp style" - What.the.actual.fuck?!
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)I'm making a suggestion about how those who DO can deal with it in a direct way instead of these insulting edicts. JUST a suggestion.
There are plenty of cases where women in business roles wear very revealing clothing and it does bother some people. Like the lawyers averting their eyes when the legal assistant is dressed in a dress so thin her black underwear is completely visible in a courtroom. I could name others.
Me I don't give a F. But others do. And I hear their complaints.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Fuck those assholes!
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Like shirts and ties that don't coordinate and wearing brown shoes and belt with everything. And the damn camo.
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)Ugh. I would wear banned clothing BECAUSE of the ban. (When I wouldn't wear most of it -- to work -- prior to ban.)
cap
(7,170 posts)Opened toed sandals are wrong? Really immodest? Come on?
No leggings in Montana winter? So how are you going to keep warm while wearing a dress?
I really don't see female legislators dressing with low cut necklines or extreme mini skirts. Come on, guys, post the violations so all of us can judge the immodesty. Really.... How about a few pin up pics of palin
mnhtnbb
(31,384 posts)In 2012 she ran for the US House of Representatives and lost to Daines.
Kim Gillan. I'm sure she'd be offended by this. What a bunch of jerks.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Seriously, though as every DUer knows, politicians actually do whats available on the list of what they can 'get away with'; usually legislative agendas work from easiest to hardest.
What made this so easy?
tanyev
(42,552 posts)ladyVet
(1,587 posts)Do they all wander around dressed in "business casual" as expressed on the Charmed TV show, or any of the other current shows with young women in the cast? Are they flouncing their tits and ass-cracks in public?
No? Then they should tell these men to fuck off.
The code crosses a line. It singles women out for admonishment and suggests they can't be trusted to get up in the morning and dress appropriately," said the Democrat from the state capital, Helena.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)And if the men have a code (coats, ties, etc.) I see no reason why the women shouldn't have one, also
But women should have been members of the committee that drew up the dress code!
Ridiculous, sexist mistake not to include them.
jmowreader
(50,555 posts)It requires "business formal" - suits and four-in-hand ties, which is going to piss off the Montana legislators who feel bolo ties are appropriate professional attire, like their last Democratic governor did.