Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(63,195 posts)
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 10:17 AM Dec 2014

Has there ever been "a ticking time bomb?"

To justify the use of torture, torture-fetishists often cite the hypothetical "ticking time bomb" scenario, in which an imminent threat can be stopped in time only if we brutalize a prisoner to obtain information about the threat.

It's a seductive rationalization, because it excuses all manner of atrocities by invoking the safety of the greater good, and it resonates nicely with slogans about protecting the freedom of innocent Americans. Of course, it's merely the tip of a wedge, because once we accept that premise, then we can easily fudge the numbers on the imminence of the threat, or the severity of the threat, or the particular prisoners whom we decide have the necessary info, etc.

But has this hypothetical situation ever actually happened? Have we ever faced a situation in which some terrible event was guaranteed to happen unless we tortured someone? Did we torture that person? Did we thereby prevent the terrible event?

With their anal rape circus now at least partially revealed, the CIA and its apologists are insisting that we did indeed extract vital, actionable intelligence via hoses inserted deep into the rectums (and beyond) of innocent victims, along with a host of equally vile tactics. Of course, they won't tell us exactly who told us what, because secrecy. But does anyone doubt that they'd have said exactly the same thing if they'd obtained false information or no information at all?

In short, there is simply no justification for torture, and Orwellian equivocation about "enhanced interrogation" is simply an attempt to sanitize the process for dumbed-down public consumption.


I gather that most of us here are on the same page about this, but if you run into someone (on Facebook or at a holiday dinner or wherever) who trots out the beloved "ticking time bomb" excuse, make them provide specific examples of cases in which this bizarre hypothetical has ever actually unfolded in the real world as imagined in the fantasy.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has there ever been "a ticking time bomb?" (Original Post) Orrex Dec 2014 OP
That scenario has been faced in countless movies Bjorn Against Dec 2014 #1
I'm glad that you mentioned 24, because it's even more relevant now Orrex Dec 2014 #7
Exactly. Only in the movies or on TV. yellowcanine Dec 2014 #10
I think Wyle E. Coyote had one notadmblnd Dec 2014 #2
Yeah that phrase was ridiculous titaniumsalute Dec 2014 #3
The problem with it is that we can all imagine it happening el_bryanto Dec 2014 #4
Or edhopper Dec 2014 #5
Sure, we've all seen the movie. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #6
Has anybody ever called Dick Cheney "James Bondesque"? world wide wally Dec 2014 #8
Yes because Bond was always going in to get work done on his "ticker." yellowcanine Dec 2014 #11
Sarah Palin GeorgeGist Dec 2014 #9
Well, then there's... 2naSalit Dec 2014 #12
A philosophy prof I know asked this question: Recursion Dec 2014 #13
What was the point of that academic hair-splitting, if you don't mind my KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #14
No, I think it's a very profound question that completely damages the "ticking time bomb" argument Recursion Dec 2014 #16
Ah, I got you. I thought maybe it was an Ethics class or some such. (Was assuming KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #19
It wasn't in class, it was him asking it over a beer Recursion Dec 2014 #20
Since you mention beer, allow me to bring John Milton (via A.E. Housman) KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #21
The question should be edhopper Dec 2014 #15
Maybe you can just try unplugging it. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2014 #17
If there has been how would we know of it? former9thward Dec 2014 #18

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
1. That scenario has been faced in countless movies
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 10:48 AM
Dec 2014

In real life not so much, but because the right-wing tends to base their views on fiction an episode of 24 carries far more weight with them than reality does.

Orrex

(63,195 posts)
7. I'm glad that you mentioned 24, because it's even more relevant now
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 11:07 AM
Dec 2014

I didn't watch most of the (original) final season nor any of the season set in London, but we all know that 24 is regarded as a prime example of torture porn.

The interesting thing, especially in the context of the newly released report, is that in the entire run of the series that I watched, I only recall one instance when torture employed by the "good" guys actually gleaned useful intelligence--in the first 3 minutes of the pilot episode. And in that case I believe that South Korea did the torturing.

In pretty much all other cases, the information obtained was false, or redundant, or incorrect, or obsolete, and in some cases innocent people were indeed tortured for (ultimately) no reason. Further, uber-tough-guy Jack Bauer practically disintegrated over the course of the show, thanks in large measure to the raw destructiveness of inflicting the torture in the first place.

Yes, the violence may have been gratuitous, but the clear message IMO is that torture doesn't work and serves only to destroy the people who commit it.


In that sense, 24 is sadly true-to-life, undercutting the CIA's claims about the efficacy of torture.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
10. Exactly. Only in the movies or on TV.
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 11:18 AM
Dec 2014

For one thing, bombs usually don't "tick," at least not anymore. They generally go off when someone sets them off electronically.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
4. The problem with it is that we can all imagine it happening
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 10:55 AM
Dec 2014

Largely because of movies and television shows in which it did happen. But there's a reason that trope keeps showing up - it could theoretically happen.

That said, that's a hypothetical situation - as far as I know none of the torture we inflicted literally involved a ticking time bomb.

Bryant

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
5. Or
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 11:04 AM
Dec 2014

if an extremist terrorist knows about a ticking time bomb, all the have to do is endure the torture until the bomb goes off.
Surely some one willing to blow himself up will hold off or lie until it goes boom.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. A philosophy prof I know asked this question:
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 11:54 AM
Dec 2014

"Would you torture someone to find out whether or not there was a "ticking time bomb"?

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
14. What was the point of that academic hair-splitting, if you don't mind my
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
Dec 2014

asking? I have not had much training in Formal Logic (of the Boolean truth-table variety), but how would the torturer ever be satisfied with a 'no' answer? (IOW, the act of torture already presumes the TTB does exist.)

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
16. No, I think it's a very profound question that completely damages the "ticking time bomb" argument
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 12:06 PM
Dec 2014

It was not hair-splitting, it was pointing out the weakness of that whole line of thought

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
19. Ah, I got you. I thought maybe it was an Ethics class or some such. (Was assuming
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 12:17 PM
Dec 2014

it was a prof trying to demonstrate Utilitarian ethics or some such.)

Do you remember what the upshot of the class discussion was? I'll bet it was a great discussion!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. It wasn't in class, it was him asking it over a beer
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 12:24 PM
Dec 2014

I just mean that that's the kind of question studying philosophy leads you to ask and think about when asked.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
21. Since you mention beer, allow me to bring John Milton (via A.E. Housman)
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 12:28 PM
Dec 2014

into the discussion:

Malt does more than Milton can
To justify God's ways to man.

edhopper

(33,554 posts)
15. The question should be
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 12:04 PM
Dec 2014

if there was a ticking bomb. is there any expectation that torture would give you results?
Why would the bomber just hold off long enough for the bomb to go off?
Are other methods better?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has there ever been "...