General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's going to happen again
if we don't prosecute the motherfuckers. If they get away with it now, what's to stop them in the future? Bad publicity?
We have black heart Cheney saying he would do it all over again. Of course he would! He knows that Bush, Tenet, Yoo, Addington and himself are going to get away with ordering the torture of human beings in direct violation of US Law and treaty obligations. It would be unpleasant to the Nation to go through a prosecution but the alternative is to let it happen again. Fuck them.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)They created a new phrase ... "enhanced interrogation" ... and then they did it.
The RW fascists do not need a precedent. And you are not going to deter the NEXT SET, by prosecuting the LAST set.
Cheney was in the Nixon administration. Nixon was impeached.
What did the Cheney learn? He learned to lie. He learned to hire only loyalists.
Prosecuting THIS Cheney is not going to deter the NEXT Cheney.
I'd love to see THIS Cheney, and THIS Bush punished.
But I have no illusions that doing so would prevent their descendents from following in their path. They will modify their tactics simply because of the blow back we currently see, and that's true no matter what happens to Cheney and Bush now.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)He may have been impeached at some point but impeachment proceedings were never formally held because Nixon resigned.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)The articles of impeachment were voted out of the Judiciary Committee for full consideration by the House, but Nixon resigned before they could be debated or brought to a vote of the full House.
Scruffy Rumbler
(961 posts)My father had me sit and watch the whole resignation and the pardoning events. He was so angry about Watergate. He said Gerald Ford's pardoning of Nixon would allow for greater misdeeds by the Republicans in the coming years.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)My Dad loathed 'Tricky Dick'.
Scruffy Rumbler
(961 posts)Mine was also an early conspiracy theorist .... He did not believe anything that came out of the Warren Commission's report. He felt Gerald Ford's Vice Presidency was his "reward" for his part in the whole affair. I was raised, and not just my family...most people we grew up with, never believed the whole single shooter/ magic bullet theory.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)Dad never believed the whole 'lone nut with a gun' thing, either. He did believe that Oswald was a gunman, just not the only gunman.
Dad said that it was clear that President Kennedy's head wound was caused by a frangible bullet, while Oswald's bullets were all jacketed. Given the description of the head wound by the doctors at Parkland Hospital-- descriptions he believed were entirely accurate-- he maintained that from both an objective forensic and a ballistic analysis, President Kennedy was shot from behind by a person using a frangible bullet. By applying Occam's Theorem to the available evidence, he concluded that the Secret Service was likely responsible for the fatal wound, whether by accident or as part of a conspiracy. In either case, if what he concluded was in fact correct, it would explain the Secret Service's behavior at Parkland, when they basically stole President Kennedy's body, as well as any 'changes' to the head wound that were observed by Dr. Hume, et al, at Bethesda.
2banon
(7,321 posts)And that's partly why prosecution matters.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Trying to carry water for Cheney must be hard work.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)enables those who would do wrong.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Try reading.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)I'd love to see THIS Cheney, and THIS Bush punished.
But I have no illusions that doing so would prevent their descendents from following in their path. They will modify their tactics simply because of the blow back we currently see, and that's true no matter what happens to Cheney and Bush now.
On the one hand you say it won't deter the next set and then you'd love to see them punished and then go on so say that you "have no illusions that doing so would prevent their descendents from following in their path".
Maybe I read it wrong but it sounds to me like you're trying to have it both ways and that's why I said that doing nothing enables those who do wrong.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I can want that, and also know quite well that doing so will NOT deter the other RW fascists. They are already changing their tactics based on this situation ... and that is true regardless of what happens to Bush and Cheney.
So yes, you are reading it wrong.
Rex
(65,616 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)My wife says that all the time (in a political context).
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)9:24
"Did the ends justify the means?"
"Absolutely"
This may be the most unrepentant criminal ever interviewed.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)once again shows his lack of remorse. He's behaving like Goering at Nurenberg.
JEB
(4,748 posts)is begging for his own rectal feeding.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Response to neverforget (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)They can only win if we give up.
Don't do that.
JeffHead
(1,186 posts)The phrase "Verschärfte Vernehmung" is German for "enhanced interrogation". Other translations include "intensified interrogation" or "sharpened interrogation". It's a phrase that appears to have been concocted in 1937, to describe a form of torture that would leave no marks, and hence save the embarrassment pre-war Nazi officials were experiencing as their wounded torture victims ended up in court.
Straight out of the playbook.
http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2007/05/-versch-auml-rfte-vernehmung/228158/
neverforget
(9,436 posts)language in his press conference. They can't even be honest with themselves.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-director-john-brennan-addresses-senate-torture-report/
CIA director John Brennan said Thursday that the CIA obtained valuable information from detainees who had been subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques (EITs), but the question of whether that information could have been obtained without brutal interrogation sessions was "unknowable."
"We have not concluded that it was the use of EITs within that program that allowed us to obtain useful information from detainees subjected to them. The cause-and-effect relationship between the use of EITs and useful information subsequently provided by the detainee, is, in my view, unknowable," Brennan said at a press conference.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)and setting that example would then open up the Obama admin for crimes against humanity in using its drone program, don't you think?
Let's see the debate would be like this on one side: captured terrorists have water poured up their noses, deprived of sleep and left out in the cold in order to try and get information from them about future attacks and to save American lives. on the other side: Obama doesn't even bother to capture them anymore he sends drones to destroy buildings that have terrorists in them in addition to many innocent civilians who all languish for hours slowly bleeding out or broken and irreparable die a horrible torturous death.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Well then. Our country is fucked if that's the excuse.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)why in the world won't the Obama justice dept prosecute those involved with this obvious law breaking activity?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)but I'm afraid you may be correct.
adieu
(1,009 posts)No, oh Yoo! That's who.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 12, 2014, 02:03 AM - Edit history (1)
He said that Yoo was smart but weird.
former9thward
(31,930 posts)but grade school? Really? Weird in grade school? That is something to be brought up?
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)He played a mean drum kit.
valerief
(53,235 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,771 posts). . .but it's not fit to be mentioned here.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)For every tin pot dictator who got away with torture and murder, there is a replacement waiting in the wings. Fer chrissakes, why can't people look at history!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Cause then they might be mean to him.
Rex
(65,616 posts)so we shouldn't even try...read it here on DU.
Skittles
(153,111 posts)anything to avoid critical thinking - gawd
Skittles
(153,111 posts)seriously, fuck them all
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)he have suffered far less abuse from the Repukes, he would also have gained seats in 2010. Bullies don't stop until you hit back. His cowardice has fed the beast.
Skittles
(153,111 posts)they act like he is some kind of innocent bystander