General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenator Vitter(R) reaches across the aisle to join Elizabeth's fight ag Wall Street influence
12/12/14
WASHINGTON -- Sen. David Vitter, R-La., has teamed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., on an amendment that would remove a provision from the government funding bill that they say allows taxpayer bailouts to financial institutions that engage in risky derivative trading.
The amendment isn't likely to succeed because enactment would delay final action on the $1.1 trillion spending bill that the House passed Thursday night. House members have left town, and stripping the provision would require another House vote.
...Still, the pairing of Vitter, a conservative and Warren, a liberal, on restoring a key element of the 2010 Dodd Frank law, drew some interest. Republicans, including Vitter, tried to block Warren from taking over as head of the board created by Dodd Frank to protect consumers.
Vitter has previously teamed with liberal Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio against policies they believe encourage too big to fail banks - banks that are so large that their failure would have such a dire impact on the economy as to almost require government bailouts - as occurred during the 20008 economic crisis.
Warren and Vitter both agreed it was wrong for Congress to add a last-minute provision to a spending bill allowing derivative trading to be included in transactions covered by government insurance programs.
"Ever since the new financial regulations went into place, Wall Street has been working behind the scenes to open another loophole so they could gamble with taxpayer money and get bailed out when their risky bets threaten to blow up our financial system," Warren said. "Congress should not put taxpayers on the hook for another bailout, and this giveaway that was drafted by Citigroup lobbyists has no place in a critical government funding bill."
Added Vitter: "Before Congress starts handing out Christmas presents to the megabanks and Wall Street -- we should vote on this bipartisan amendment. We need to remove these risky derivatives that aren't even necessary for normal banking purposes and would only make future taxpayer funded bailouts more likely."
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/12/sen_david_vitter_teams_with_de.html
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Both sides should be against this if they are truly working for Americans and don't want another crash.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)For a Republican that has been outspokenly against Sen. Warren this is just a little suspicious.
There is something in the air that prompted him to cooperate..Come on A Louisiana Republican is now Teaming up with Senator Warren?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)that's the ticket. they're the enemy. don't ever, ever, ever join forces with them on issues that matter, no matter what.
TBF
(32,029 posts)for working people. Working people before party. I don't owe these folks anything - they have to earn my vote.
rurallib
(62,401 posts)to be wary of any Republican taking a position outside the norm of their party.
Usually when we find a variation like this we find that the individual politician has been personally affected in some way on said issue. Makes me wonder if Vitter or someone close to him didn't get burned severely in the last economic meltdown.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Where a Republican is concerned, my philosophy is 'question everything, doubt nothing'.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)much like killing ISIL unites America and Iran and Saudi and Turkey and Syria.
At the edges where the common folk live all Crimes against humanity are recognized as the same.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)....what?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...after all, it's been said he's fond of wearing diapers.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)rubber stamp then?
"The amendment isn't likely to succeed because enactment would delay final action on the $1.1 trillion spending bill that the House passed Thursday night. House members have left town, and stripping the provision would require another House vote."
Look at how casually that is mentioned in the article...just par for the folks being fucked over, look away, nothing to see here but theatre.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Not that you nailed it! But its stinks there can't realistically be the amendment to kill the Citigroup deal. Our economy put at risk again. So a few can profit from us like the greedy blood-sucking parasites they are. Its sickening.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)as far as I could sling a baby grand!
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)Or is that never to be mentioned again now that Harry Reid wants the Dems to be the "nice" party...
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Autumn
(45,016 posts)Rhinodawg
(2,219 posts)Ok...I agree with him..he is right.
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Not sure what else could possibly motivate him to do good.