Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 07:49 AM Dec 2014

Senator Vitter(R) reaches across the aisle to join Elizabeth's fight ag Wall Street influence

Sen. David Vitter teams with Democrat Elizabeth Warren to fight spending bill item helping big banks
12/12/14

WASHINGTON -- Sen. David Vitter, R-La., has teamed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., on an amendment that would remove a provision from the government funding bill that they say allows taxpayer bailouts to financial institutions that engage in risky derivative trading.

The amendment isn't likely to succeed because enactment would delay final action on the $1.1 trillion spending bill that the House passed Thursday night. House members have left town, and stripping the provision would require another House vote.

...Still, the pairing of Vitter, a conservative and Warren, a liberal, on restoring a key element of the 2010 Dodd Frank law, drew some interest. Republicans, including Vitter, tried to block Warren from taking over as head of the board created by Dodd Frank to protect consumers.

Vitter has previously teamed with liberal Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio against policies they believe encourage too big to fail banks - banks that are so large that their failure would have such a dire impact on the economy as to almost require government bailouts - as occurred during the 20008 economic crisis.

Warren and Vitter both agreed it was wrong for Congress to add a last-minute provision to a spending bill allowing derivative trading to be included in transactions covered by government insurance programs.

"Ever since the new financial regulations went into place, Wall Street has been working behind the scenes to open another loophole so they could gamble with taxpayer money and get bailed out when their risky bets threaten to blow up our financial system," Warren said. "Congress should not put taxpayers on the hook for another bailout, and this giveaway that was drafted by Citigroup lobbyists has no place in a critical government funding bill."

Added Vitter: "Before Congress starts handing out Christmas presents to the megabanks and Wall Street -- we should vote on this bipartisan amendment. We need to remove these risky derivatives that aren't even necessary for normal banking purposes and would only make future taxpayer funded bailouts more likely."


http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/12/sen_david_vitter_teams_with_de.html
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senator Vitter(R) reaches across the aisle to join Elizabeth's fight ag Wall Street influence (Original Post) RiverLover Dec 2014 OP
Hooray for him! Thinking about the wellbeing of people of the U.S. first is a good thing! Shrike47 Dec 2014 #1
Definitely! Bipartisanhip is definitely need here. RiverLover Dec 2014 #2
Never ever trust a Republican INdemo Dec 2014 #3
because Republicans are completely incapable of doing anything good? magical thyme Dec 2014 #7
I'll trust him if he does something TBF Dec 2014 #8
Got to agree - on the surface it looks good but recent history advises us rurallib Dec 2014 #10
My first thought was 'what's in it for him' MissDeeds Dec 2014 #11
Wall Street crimes are recognized by the far right and far left, it is one tie that bonds enemies, Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #15
You know it's gotta be a bad pantload if even vitter doesnt like it Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #4
That was my thought too. But then I read he's sided with Sherrod Brown before as well. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #5
Vitter's protected when it comes to having "bad pantloads" Cooley Hurd Dec 2014 #6
Heh :) polichick Dec 2014 #9
I hope the turd way doesn't hold this against Warren Doctor_J Dec 2014 #12
So because the House left town, nothing can be done? Why not just have the Senate buy a fucking Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #13
Theatre. yep. Nailed it, Fred Sanders. That really stinks, too. RiverLover Dec 2014 #17
Sorry, I wouldn't trust Vitter RoccoR5955 Dec 2014 #14
Are there 60 votes? HomerRamone Dec 2014 #16
Guess we'll see. Depends on how many are bought by wall street, I'm guessing. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #18
Are 60 votes needed now that the republicans are in charge? Or rather almost in charge. Autumn Dec 2014 #19
You mean I actually have to say something nice about him ? Rhinodawg Dec 2014 #20
A broken clock etc. nt HomerRamone Dec 2014 #21
I think this has to be some new fetish of Vitter's. Orsino Dec 2014 #22

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
2. Definitely! Bipartisanhip is definitely need here.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 08:25 AM
Dec 2014

Both sides should be against this if they are truly working for Americans and don't want another crash.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
3. Never ever trust a Republican
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 08:56 AM
Dec 2014

For a Republican that has been outspokenly against Sen. Warren this is just a little suspicious.
There is something in the air that prompted him to cooperate..Come on A Louisiana Republican is now Teaming up with Senator Warren?

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
7. because Republicans are completely incapable of doing anything good?
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:20 AM
Dec 2014

that's the ticket. they're the enemy. don't ever, ever, ever join forces with them on issues that matter, no matter what.

TBF

(32,029 posts)
8. I'll trust him if he does something
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:32 AM
Dec 2014

for working people. Working people before party. I don't owe these folks anything - they have to earn my vote.

rurallib

(62,401 posts)
10. Got to agree - on the surface it looks good but recent history advises us
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:53 AM
Dec 2014

to be wary of any Republican taking a position outside the norm of their party.
Usually when we find a variation like this we find that the individual politician has been personally affected in some way on said issue. Makes me wonder if Vitter or someone close to him didn't get burned severely in the last economic meltdown.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
11. My first thought was 'what's in it for him'
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:01 AM
Dec 2014

Where a Republican is concerned, my philosophy is 'question everything, doubt nothing'.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
15. Wall Street crimes are recognized by the far right and far left, it is one tie that bonds enemies,
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:00 PM
Dec 2014

much like killing ISIL unites America and Iran and Saudi and Turkey and Syria.

At the edges where the common folk live all Crimes against humanity are recognized as the same.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
6. Vitter's protected when it comes to having "bad pantloads"
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:16 AM
Dec 2014

...after all, it's been said he's fond of wearing diapers.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
13. So because the House left town, nothing can be done? Why not just have the Senate buy a fucking
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:50 AM
Dec 2014

rubber stamp then?


"The amendment isn't likely to succeed because enactment would delay final action on the $1.1 trillion spending bill that the House passed Thursday night. House members have left town, and stripping the provision would require another House vote."


Look at how casually that is mentioned in the article...just par for the folks being fucked over, look away, nothing to see here but theatre.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
17. Theatre. yep. Nailed it, Fred Sanders. That really stinks, too.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 06:31 PM
Dec 2014

Not that you nailed it! But its stinks there can't realistically be the amendment to kill the Citigroup deal. Our economy put at risk again. So a few can profit from us like the greedy blood-sucking parasites they are. Its sickening.

HomerRamone

(1,112 posts)
16. Are there 60 votes?
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 06:16 PM
Dec 2014

Or is that never to be mentioned again now that Harry Reid wants the Dems to be the "nice" party...

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
22. I think this has to be some new fetish of Vitter's.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 08:56 PM
Dec 2014

Not sure what else could possibly motivate him to do good.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senator Vitter(R) reaches...