Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats who voted 'YES' have received twice as much $$ from finance industry as the ‘NO’ voters
Democrats who voted for the CRomnibus have received twice as much money from the finance industry as the no voters
12/12/14
We'll start with the thing that will catch your attention, as is the way: Democrats who voted for the giant spending bill on Thursday night received, on average, twice the campaign contributions from the finance/insurance/real estate industry as their colleagues who voted against it.
Debate over the bill, you'll remember, ended up being centered on the repeal of a restriction on big banks imposed after the financial collapse that led to the recession.
The vote in the House -- which ended up being far narrower than the White House would have liked -- resulted in an interesting geographic split. Here's how it looked~
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=
Democrats in conservative areas (the South, upstate New York) voted for the bill. Republicans in conservative areas ... didn't. That doesn't hold true universally, but it's striking to see Kansas and Texas and Louisiana have so much of that lighter red color, showing Republicans who bucked Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and opposed the measure. (The black areas are districts whose representatives didn't vote.)
We cross-referenced the vote with data from the Center for Responsive Politics on how much each member had received in campaign contributions from the finance/insurance/real estate industries. This isn't only from PACs affiliated with those industries, we'll note; it also includes employees of firms in those industries. On average, members of Congress who voted yes received $322,000 from those industries. Those who voted no? $162,000.
Here's the split by party....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/12/12/democrats-who-voted-for-the-spending-bill-have-received-twice-as-much-money-from-the-finance-industry-as-the-no-voters/
12/12/14
We'll start with the thing that will catch your attention, as is the way: Democrats who voted for the giant spending bill on Thursday night received, on average, twice the campaign contributions from the finance/insurance/real estate industry as their colleagues who voted against it.
Debate over the bill, you'll remember, ended up being centered on the repeal of a restriction on big banks imposed after the financial collapse that led to the recession.
The vote in the House -- which ended up being far narrower than the White House would have liked -- resulted in an interesting geographic split. Here's how it looked~
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=
Democrats in conservative areas (the South, upstate New York) voted for the bill. Republicans in conservative areas ... didn't. That doesn't hold true universally, but it's striking to see Kansas and Texas and Louisiana have so much of that lighter red color, showing Republicans who bucked Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and opposed the measure. (The black areas are districts whose representatives didn't vote.)
We cross-referenced the vote with data from the Center for Responsive Politics on how much each member had received in campaign contributions from the finance/insurance/real estate industries. This isn't only from PACs affiliated with those industries, we'll note; it also includes employees of firms in those industries. On average, members of Congress who voted yes received $322,000 from those industries. Those who voted no? $162,000.
Here's the split by party....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/12/12/democrats-who-voted-for-the-spending-bill-have-received-twice-as-much-money-from-the-finance-industry-as-the-no-voters/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 875 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats who voted 'YES' have received twice as much $$ from finance industry as the ‘NO’ voters (Original Post)
RiverLover
Dec 2014
OP
Actually looking at that map, the Democratic and Republican No areas just may be enough to stop it
still_one
Dec 2014
#2
As damning as that may be why do I have the sick feeling that is really telling us the NOs
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#4
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. Quelle surprise.
Kinda sad, really, we argue about policies and principals and platforms. Must be a lot of chortling about this in DC, I think.
still_one
(92,138 posts)2. Actually looking at that map, the Democratic and Republican No areas just may be enough to stop it
Incidently, the link didn't work for me
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)3. I hope you're right!!
still_one
(92,138 posts)6. I do to but I am also quite pessimestic that it will
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)4. As damning as that may be why do I have the sick feeling that is really telling us the NOs
are simply waiting for their share?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)5. Jeez, how much did Repub yes votes receive from finance?
Must be huge.
Triana
(22,666 posts)7. Duplicate
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)8. I usually do a search first. *crap* Sorry!!!!
That'll teach me.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)9. The corrupt are doing corrupt things.
In other breaking news, water is wet.