What if they pick one day, and every theater in America

[edhopper]

shows The Interview at the same time.

Are they going to attack every theater?


(it's probably not practical, but it would be a strong message)

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

1. WE should either entice all IT people in NK to leave there and come here and live rich lives

or tell them they are not safe if they EVER do this again.

I am a pacifist, usually, but the damage these little cocksuckers could do is not acceptable.

[edhopper]

3. We should retaliate

but be clever about it.

How about setting up broadcast stations all around NK and broadcasting The Interview for a week.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

11. But think about the harm they could do to our power infrastructure

They could wipe out our electrical grid, air traffic, etc.

This is an act of war if it goes one step further.

[tradewinds]

2. Air it on Network TV Primetime!

[HappyMe]

4. Yup.

I agree.

[tradewinds]

5. Looks like a pretty bad movie, but under these circumstances, I'd watch it for principle.

[HappyMe]

8. Whether it's bad or good is besides the point.

I really don't understand why people keep bringing that up. I think that the sappy Disney princess movies are bad. Plus we have the added "delight" of being stuck with it being on Broadway, on ice and endless toys are always involved. And having those howling songs played over and over....
NOT THE POINT.

[tradewinds]

15. Why so hostile??

Did you fail to notice that I advocated airing it on Network TV in prime time??

Stop hitting me, I am not resisting!!!!

[HappyMe]

17. I am hardly hostile.

[Logical]

12. Really, what do you consider a good movie? And what difference does it make? nt

[tradewinds]

14. Makes no difference at all. Why the hostility?

Seth Rogan is just not my cup-o-tea.

[Marrah_G]

6. They should just be going about things as usual

Ignore the petulant, incompetant childgod

[edhopper]

10. Is Cuba as well?

Do you think we can discuss more than one topic at a time?

[YarnAddict]

9. My personal opinion

is that Sony's decision had nothing to do with threats of violence and everything to do with the top people not wanting their insulting and/or racist e-mails revealed. There are a LOT of people who were embarassed (and worse) over what has been revealed so far, and you can bet there is much, much more that hasn't been revealed--yet. Cancelling the movie was an attempt to pre-empt any further revelations.

[tradewinds]

16. Actually, I think it had more to do with the Terrorism Insurance Act.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/18/business/a-bill-on-terrorism-insurance-is-stopped-by-a-senators-objection.html?_r=0

[TwilightGardener]

13. I was thinking maybe Sony can sell the film to a company that is willing

to distribute or air it--a small company that can't be meaningfully hacked.