General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama calls on ONLY men at press conference.
I remember how upset men were.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/press-conference-president-nuclear-security-summit
The fact is, Obama regularly calls on mostly men. I looked up about 30 press conferences and the questioners were predominately men.
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)but can't find any........
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)It wasn't. Also not reported is the fact that, regularly, women are, by far, in the minority when the press conferences are opened up to women.
I also find it laughable that people cannot take this for the gesture in which the Admin intended. That is; in putting together the list for Obama, his press team noticed those who had rarely been called on to ask him a question. The team decided to give them an opportunity. They all happened to be women.
I think it is #1) A good thing to notice and address the bias (and I hope there will be more balance in the future and #) to applaud the Admin for highlighting the bias in his year end conference by calling on the women.
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)take questions from those not called on much (regardless of gender) then I would be VERY supportive of that. If it turned out that was all women I would be fine with it.
Second, they probably should not have made the joke about 'naughty and nice' in connection with this outreach. Can you not see how it at least seems that men would be 'naughty' and women 'nice' according to the administration with this outreach?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/19/obama-women-press-conference_n_6356440.html
And, I do think it was a lame joke but I don't think it was directed towards men but to the entire press pool which includes women that he does regularly call on. I think it was supposed to be in spirit of the season.
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)in a fair manner (making some adjustments for size/scope of media operation they represent) and have no problem if it is all women (or all men) who thus get called on.
I DO have a problem when you make a conscious effort to make anything single gender, no matter your 'good' intentions.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)It states:
TV reporters were advised in advance that @PressSec wanted other reporters not regularly called on to get to question the Pres.
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)that. Further, if that is the main reason, (not regularly called on) I would assume that some enterprising young GOP staffer is out there right now crunching the numbers to make sure that these 8 reporters were the 8 reporters that statistically were those least called on. It was just a coincidence that they just happened all to be women. Or maybe not.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)By far. And most of these women are from major news organizations. In the 30 or so press conferences that I pulled up from the White House site, not one of the women called on today were ever called on to ask a question in the past.
So we have the Admin addressing the imbalance and I am not afraid of the GOP's ignorant spin on the issue.
kelly1mm
(4,732 posts)search and found that the White House pays it's women staffers less too.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/us/politics/as-obama-spotlights-gender-gap-in-wages-his-own-payroll-draws-scrutiny.html?_r=0
If these 8 women had never been called on in 30 pressers before than they certainly would meet the test of being unfairly treated so I have no problem then with them being called.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)BO is trolling us all. I think the next 2 years are gonna be a lot of fun. Peoples' heads will be spinning out of control and exploding at the same time.
Am dying to know who came up with all this 4th quarter game plan. Genius
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)So here I am, shrieking. Not sure why, but I do what I am told.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)Quote from another thread.
Someone here (actually, many ones) has a sad.
Thank you for pointing out the double standard.