Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 10:46 PM Dec 2014

Keystone XL no longer makes sense, critics argue

WASHINGTON, Dec. 19 (UPI) -- A memo sent to the White House by lead environmental groups argues the Keystone XL pipeline planned from Canada fails key climate tests.

Pipeline company TransCanada submitted the application to the U.S. federal government necessary to build Keystone XL across the U.S.-Canadian border more than six years ago. The project has faced stiff opposition from climate groups worried about the effects the heavier grade of Canadian crude oil would have on the environment.

A memo sent to President Barack Obama from seven environmental groups, led by the Natural Resources Defense Council and Oil Change International, argues the pipeline would add to the development of Canadian crude oil and subsequently add millions of tons of carbon pollution to the atmosphere.

"Market forces and the latest climate science make it clear Keystone XL shouldn't be approved because it would drive up carbon pollution, making climate change worse and jeopardizing our future," Anthony Swift, staff attorney in NRDC's international program, said in the memo sent Thursday. "It's not a plan to help our country."

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2014/12/19/Keystone-XL-no-longer-makes-sense-critics-argue/1011418989663/#ixzz3MP0bf9nV

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keystone XL no longer makes sense, critics argue (Original Post) JonLP24 Dec 2014 OP
How does the carbons go lower if the crude comes from other sources? Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #1
Other sources are higher quality oil FogerRox Dec 2014 #6
In my opinion A Little Weird Dec 2014 #2
+1 MiniMe Dec 2014 #3
What drives me crazy is that it isn't even oil that belongs to the US MiniMe Dec 2014 #4
The tar sands are in the US also. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #8
K Cha Dec 2014 #5
It makes perfect sense for the repubs IDemo Dec 2014 #7

FogerRox

(13,211 posts)
6. Other sources are higher quality oil
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 01:22 PM
Dec 2014

Other sources dont destroy the peat bogs of Alberta, which releases C02 & methane which is a GHG.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
7. It makes perfect sense for the repubs
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 02:01 PM
Dec 2014

It's a tool they can continue to use to attack Democrats for willful destruction of the economy. Their base does not comprehend the actual numbers that destroy this case, or flatly denies them. It's a political nightstick like Benghazi, nothing more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Keystone XL no longer mak...