Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:15 PM Apr 2012

A disturbing stat I heard recently

Less than fifty percent of those making $25,000 or less annually tend to vote, while ninty plus percent of those making $100,000 or more tend to vote...I don't know, but I believe there are probably a lot more people that make $25,000 or less than there are that make $100,000 or more. $25,000 is $12.00 an hour....

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
3. And shorten or eliminate Early Voting and reduce polling places.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:45 PM
Apr 2012

Workers at the $25,000 or below are hourly workers, and don't get time off to vote. Also, they tend to move more frequently than higher income people so their Voter's Registration has to be changed along with their other IDs.

See, there's lots of ways to "discourage" voters like this.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
2. Makes sense in a way. If you make more, you have a vested interest to protect.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:17 PM
Apr 2012

That seems to motivate people more than an interest in changing things to create a vested interest someday.

Plus, those with money control the message.

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
4. It's much easier for the "Have More's" to vote.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:46 PM
Apr 2012

They don't have to take time off without pay. All their IDs match since they live at the same address longer.

And if/when they move, they can take time off to get their new Voter Registration and to get their IDs changed.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
5. In a strange way
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:51 PM
Apr 2012

Those in the lower income categories have more of a "vested interest". As you say, the upper brackets have alot of influence outside of just voting. They can influence the debate. Their spending patterns influence market patterns and investment patterns.

But the lower classes have VERY little influence outside of voting. They have little disposable income to influence market patterns. They tend to be more influenced by, rather than dictating, market patterns.

It's why unions really need to move into the 21st century and start representing workers in more ways than just collective barganing. Unions, and various other forms of cooperative organizing are one of the few ways outside of voting that the working class can influence markets and investment patterns.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
7. I make a lot less than that and believe me I have a vested interest - food stamps, medicare,
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 02:54 PM
Apr 2012

medicaid, earned income, etc. For the working poor it is often hard to vote - ie they do not have time off to go vote or may not have easily accessible transportation.

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
6. Working folks have to work.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:52 PM
Apr 2012

The new restrictions on voting along with polling place closings and polling place misinformation make it hard to get to polling places during off-work hours. Transpo costs and getting to the kids also takes a toll.

Having polls open Saturday and Sunday for all elections would ease the problems.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A disturbing stat I heard...