Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:03 PM Jan 2015

Did you see American Sniper or planning on going?

I admit I did see it.....sold out crowd in my showing. Not sure why everyone is flocking to it. It was a great movie but it just sort of came out of nowhere. My theater was not prepared for the outpouring and had to add showings on Friday and Saturday.


31 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
8 (26%)
No
23 (74%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did you see American Sniper or planning on going? (Original Post) yeoman6987 Jan 2015 OP
I won't support NRA- GOP pandering... FarPoint Jan 2015 #1
I'll wait for it OnDemand. aikoaiko Jan 2015 #2
Does it have a scene of Eastwood talking to any empty chair, then I will watch it? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #3
I think that the attendees were expecting this Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2015 #6
I love satire. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #9
Saw it before it came out. bigwillq Jan 2015 #4
Unless it's animated or massively effects/action driven, I wait for Redbox Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2015 #5
I've seen it. woolldog Jan 2015 #7
Probably wait for the DVD Lurks Often Jan 2015 #8
No way, glorify killing. And more rah rah USA bullshit. nt Logical Jan 2015 #10
I read it made Joe Biden cry. nt benz380 Jan 2015 #11
No, but I really don't go to many movies. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #12
I thought it was good and didn't find it to glorify much of anything but maybe one man's character TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #13
Nice to hear from someone who has seen it Beaverhausen Jan 2015 #34
I'm more against the glorifying of Chris Kyle than anything else JonLP24 Jan 2015 #48
Will pirate, I wont waste money on a fake hero Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #14
Great , great movie. Rhinodawg Jan 2015 #15
Was it the Muslims getting killed you loved about it alcibiades_mystery Jan 2015 #19
I don't see pro-military industrial complex movies. Fearless Jan 2015 #16
Then you can freely see this movie yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #17
The raw truth presented is questionable at best JonLP24 Jan 2015 #55
I saw but it but didn't think it Oscar worthy. nt m-lekktor Jan 2015 #18
I don't think it will get an Oscar win yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #20
It cost just under 69 million, so they were expecting way more than 10. Certainly outpacing Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #25
lol RandiFan1290 Jan 2015 #26
Why would a Clint Eastwood film not make money? Beaverhausen Jan 2015 #35
This thread doesn't work unless AS was an "underdog" with "surprise appeal" on the part of "everyday alcibiades_mystery Jan 2015 #46
Sounds like the huge business "Patton" did in the 70's, during the Viet Nam war. Paladin Jan 2015 #21
'Patton' was one of the things that made me certain I'd never allow myself to be drafted. Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #30
Francis Ford Coppola did a hell of a job on that "Patton" screenplay. Paladin Jan 2015 #37
NONBHN edgineered Jan 2015 #22
yes, it was a good movie Baclava Jan 2015 #23
This is an interesting piece from Smithsonian magazine: Raine1967 Jan 2015 #62
Like every other movie wait for the blu-ray Arcadiasix Jan 2015 #24
Watching a movie at home and one at the theater are hugely different experiences. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #31
No whining kids, no one on phones, popcorn way cheaper Arcadiasix Jan 2015 #40
:-( HERVEPA Jan 2015 #49
I only attend big sci if stuff with special effects. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2015 #59
Have to agree.... EX500rider Jan 2015 #61
Thanks no. I lived through the war propaganda. Starry Messenger Jan 2015 #27
I know I have to fit that in some how yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #41
How many people did this guy kill? B Calm Jan 2015 #28
I think over 160 glasshouses Jan 2015 #43
Damn, I wonder how he could sleep at night without nightmares. B Calm Jan 2015 #58
I'll go to Selma. leveymg Jan 2015 #29
Mass murdering psychopath, celebrated whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #32
I got my fill with a single photo of an American sniper at Clive Bundy's spread. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #33
On my short list to see once the crowds die down. nt B2G Jan 2015 #36
Very remote chance of me seeing it. I don't go to the movies nor do I own a TVEE. Rex Jan 2015 #38
No thanks. Seen too much of it already in the promos. Contrary1 Jan 2015 #39
Didn't vote. As with all movies, I'll wait till it comes out on DVD. Kaleva Jan 2015 #42
Hell no JonLP24 Jan 2015 #44
I'll wait till it comes out on DVD but yes I do plan on watching it glasshouses Jan 2015 #45
I may add it to my Netflix queue, but probably not. WorseBeforeBetter Jan 2015 #47
I have zero interest in seeing this movie Gothmog Jan 2015 #50
This film is making hella money..why? PasadenaTrudy Jan 2015 #51
I haven't seen it...but if Eastwood did as good of a job as he did with "Letters From Iwo Jima" EX500rider Jan 2015 #63
Because it is a very well made movie hack89 Jan 2015 #64
Not a chance. BillZBubb Jan 2015 #52
Maybe I'll watch it when it eventually makes it to TCM Cleita Jan 2015 #53
Ick. Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #54
I was hoping Paul Rubins would get the part olddots Jan 2015 #56
Don't plan to see it atreides1 Jan 2015 #57
Saw it. pecwae Jan 2015 #60
Movies like this make me really miss Roger Ebert. Raine1967 Jan 2015 #65
Just saw it. Well done but very disturbing. DCBob Jan 2015 #66
A scene in Boyhood bigwillq Jan 2015 #68
Never saw a single film about the "War on Terror," 9/11, or the Iraq War. 6000eliot Jan 2015 #67
Not interested in a story about a guy who killed dozens of people and brags about it Ramses Jan 2015 #69
No, war movies are boring dissentient Jan 2015 #70
You couldn't pay me to watch it. Blue_In_AK Jan 2015 #71

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
3. Does it have a scene of Eastwood talking to any empty chair, then I will watch it?
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:11 PM
Jan 2015



And he needed a Teleprompter for that disastrous performance....now he is making movies?
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
4. Saw it before it came out.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jan 2015

Had a "screeners copy" Thought it was pretty good but not great. Bradley Cooper was outstanding.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
5. Unless it's animated or massively effects/action driven, I wait for Redbox
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jan 2015

I made an exception last year for Alexander Payne's "Nebraska"

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
12. No, but I really don't go to many movies.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:18 PM
Jan 2015

If my wife or one of the kids gets it on demand one of these days I might watch it.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
13. I thought it was good and didn't find it to glorify much of anything but maybe one man's character
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:43 PM
Jan 2015

while painting him as certainly flawed and in some important ways oblivious but well intentioned and idealistic to the point of tunnel vision.

Seemed to me the story of foolish idealisim, becoming addicted to Hell, PTSD, families pushed to the breaking point, more Hell, more PTSD, only being whole and functional in Hell, becoming broken, finding a way back, and ending up dead from a bullet from another broken soul he was trying to help in his way.

I've seen comments saying it romanticized the Iraq war, those folks must have a different concept of romance, looked awful and soul crushing to me.

I've seen comments calling it an NRA commercial and I don't get that either. It did certainly have guns in it as would be unavoidable in making a movie about the subject matter.

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)
34. Nice to hear from someone who has seen it
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:02 PM
Jan 2015

Lots of assumptions here.

I heard it's really good and I plan to see it.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
48. I'm more against the glorifying of Chris Kyle than anything else
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 03:12 PM
Jan 2015

Anything less including that he was conflicted is inaccurate to the myths he gave himself and told many lies.

The opening of the film depicts Kyle killing a pubescent boy and his mother as they attempt to throw a grenade at American marines. “The woman forced him into a situation where he had to make a choice,” said Taya of the incident. “Either he lets these marines die or he swallows his heart and says I’ve got to do this. It hurt him, but either he does it or someone else has to get on the gun.”

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/16/bradley-cooper-american-sniper-not-political

This bothers me considering 3 out of 4 Iraq war recipients dived on a grenade to absorb the blast and not aware a "woman & a child" presenting a prisoner's dilemma while forgetting the third option. There are much better & truthful stories to choose from but they picked the one guy that views himself as a Rambo and forgives him.

A movie like Jarhead nails the boredom aspect but fails miserably in other ways such as the wide open nothingness which surrounds them but old time Marine who served in the Gulf War says the inaction part is accurate. However, choosing the lying sociopath an inspiration for a Hollywood movie is troubling.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
17. Then you can freely see this movie
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:54 PM
Jan 2015

Nothing pro-military industrial complex at all. It is a raw truth of what it is like in war and not in a pretty way. Go see it and then comment cuz you will have a different opinion.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
55. The raw truth presented is questionable at best
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 03:52 PM
Jan 2015

Not to mention it whitewashes Chris Kyle's own claims which a portion of proceeds will be used to pay Jesse Venture in a defamation law suit of all things.

Descriptions start of with the presentation of a woman & child & either shot or risk comrade deaths by allowing the grenade to be thrown when in reality 3 out of 4 Medal of Honor award winners didn't live to receive them because they dived on the grenade to absorb the blast to save comrade deaths.

In my experience, the only time I saw children they waved at us which I have no idea why but there were many stories of kids throwing rocks which was told with the expression of contempt for the rock throwers. The raw truth includes many US troops labeling the citizens Hajis & small shops set-up by locals as Haji shops & TCNs did all the grunt work while facing the majority of the bigotry while receiving the smallest checks. Raw truth would include labor exploitation of third country nationals from India, Nepal, Phillipines, countries in Africa among other sources which the Department of Defense was behind the unjust & unethical labor practices but I doubt that sort of raw truth would sell here.

I should give Generation Kill a shot because I value David Simon's approach in reality & humanization rather than 'white hat' vs 'black hat'. The movie Traitor told some raw truth which is unlike the recent Iraq war movements inspired by books with questionable claims such as WMD in 'Lone Survivor'.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
20. I don't think it will get an Oscar win
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:57 PM
Jan 2015

I think this was a movie that was supposed to make around 10 million and for some reason has gone on to be a hit. Nobody saw this coming. They were wondering if it was going to beat Titanic and Avatar on the news this morning. I think that is a bit exaggerated on the part of the news casters but it will certainly make a lot of money.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
25. It cost just under 69 million, so they were expecting way more than 10. Certainly outpacing
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:13 PM
Jan 2015

expectations of course. I don't think it will win either.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
46. This thread doesn't work unless AS was an "underdog" with "surprise appeal" on the part of "everyday
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jan 2015

Americans."

Nobody was expecting it to make any money, but that's only because they were liberal Hollywood types! Instead, it's gonna be the biggest box office draw like EVER, and people were cheering in the aisles of every theater of America this weekend blah blah blah.

The whole sell here is so stupid that it hardly bears mentioning, but everything these people do has to be "underdog" and "overcoming the forces meant to suppress us."

It's so tedious.

Paladin

(28,246 posts)
21. Sounds like the huge business "Patton" did in the 70's, during the Viet Nam war.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:04 PM
Jan 2015

Anybody who claims this is a peace-loving nation has their head up their ass.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
30. 'Patton' was one of the things that made me certain I'd never allow myself to be drafted.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:23 PM
Jan 2015

I was far too young to be, but that vacuum loomed for males at the time. The film did not make war look good, nor appealing. It made Patton himself look both brilliant and mad. Which he was.
My father, who was in the war, said it was the first honest movie he'd ever seen about any war hero. He thought Patton was a bad leader, good at the battle, bad with those who must fight it which he found unacceptable.
That huge flag and that profane, extremely certain madman addressing the camera at the opening was for me at that time a very subversive and powerful image.
Message: wars are run by profane madmen who use the flag as their personal set piece.

Paladin

(28,246 posts)
37. Francis Ford Coppola did a hell of a job on that "Patton" screenplay.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:27 PM
Jan 2015

And of course George C. Scott was amazing. I remember the movie did weeks and weeks of SRO business in my home town, just a few miles from a big college campus where there was at least one big anti-war rally a week. Strange times. One of my favorite uncles was a lifer in the Army back then; I asked him if he'd seen the movie, and he said "Hell no I haven't seen it. I had to fight for the sonovabitch."

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
22. NONBHN
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:05 PM
Jan 2015

Not only no but hell no

Just guessing that those carrying popcorn will be outnumber by those carrying other things. Don't care to get popped, so to speak even if it were an accident.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
23. yes, it was a good movie
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:06 PM
Jan 2015

should have made one about a woman - Lyudmila Pavlichenko - real life Soviet WWII sniper hero - 309 confirmed kills against the Nazis

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
62. This is an interesting piece from Smithsonian magazine:
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 06:39 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/eleanor-roosevelt-and-the-soviet-sniper-23585278/?no-ist

I'm no fan of war, but I agree with you. It would be wonderful to see a movie made about this woman.

She visited with President Franklin Roosevelt, becoming the first Soviet citizen to be welcomed at the White House. Afterward, Eleanor Roosevelt asked the Ukranian-born officer to accompany her on a tour of the country and tell Americans of her experiences as a woman in combat. Pavlichenko was only 25, but she had been wounded four times in battle. She also happened to be the most successful and feared female sniper in history, with 309 confirmed kills to her credit—the majority German soldiers. She readily accepted the first lady’s offer.

She graciously fielded questions from reporters. One wanted to know if Russian women could wear makeup at the front. Pavlichenko paused; just months before, she’d survived fighting on the front line during the Siege of Sevastopol, where Soviet forces suffered considerable casualties and were forced to surrender after eight months of fighting. “There is no rule against it,” Pavlichenko said, “but who has time to think of her shiny nose when a battle is going on?”

The New York Times dubbed her the “Girl Sniper,” and other newspapers observed that she “wore no lip rouge, or makeup of any kind,” and that “there isn’t much style to her olive-green uniform.”

In New York, she was greeted by Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia and a representative of the International Fur and Leather Workers Union, C.I.O., who presented her with, as one paper reported, a “full-length raccoon coat of beautifully blended skins, which would be resplendent in an opera setting.” The paper lamented that such a garment would likely “go to the wars on Russia’s bloody steppes when Lyudmila Pavlichenko returns to her homeland.”

But as the tour progressed, Pavlichenko began to bristle at the questions, and her clear, dark eyes found focus. One reporter seemed to criticize the long length of her uniform skirt, implying that it made her look fat. In Boston, another reporter observed that Pavlichenko “attacked her five-course New England breakfast yesterday. American food, she thinks, is O.K.”

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
31. Watching a movie at home and one at the theater are hugely different experiences.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:24 PM
Jan 2015

I feel sad for those whose don't get the wonder of seeing a movie at the theater.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,318 posts)
59. I only attend big sci if stuff with special effects.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 05:52 PM
Jan 2015

Everything else can wait for home viewing.

When we go to the theater, we prefer the new theater with reserved seats and a bar. Icon Theater in chicago. It's a little more pricey but worth it.

EX500rider

(10,829 posts)
61. Have to agree....
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 06:34 PM
Jan 2015

....that's why i bought a HD digital projector ($230 on Amazon) and a 9 ft x 6 ft screen (homemade with hotel blackout curtain) with a 1,000 watt 6 speaker surround sound system (bought used at a pawn shop for $80) set up in my living room. (the screen rolls up to the ceiling when not in use)...with a Bluray player it's almost like being at the theater...the great 5.1 sound makes a big difference, so does speaker placement and adjustment.
Now I have to watch all my fav movies over again on the big screen! And repurchase a lot of DVD's on Bluray since you really notice the difference when you enlarge it that much....sigh....thank god used Blurays have come down a bunch on Amazon. i get some for a penny + $3.99 shipping. With a Bluray rental being $2.14 at Redbox plus I have to drive up to pick it up and drive back to drop it off I just wait till it gets cheap on Amazon...for just a $1.86 more it's easier & I own the movie!

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
27. Thanks no. I lived through the war propaganda.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:16 PM
Jan 2015

I don't need to pay to relive the Bush slaughter.

When are you going to see Selma?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
41. I know I have to fit that in some how
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:37 PM
Jan 2015

It will be gone from the theaters soon. Most movies last about 4 weeks so it has about two weeks left. It has only made 20 million so far. Hopefully tomorrow will increase it some.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
29. I'll go to Selma.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:18 PM
Jan 2015

Not forking over $14 to see anything that even remotely glorifies unjust wars and those who fight them.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
33. I got my fill with a single photo of an American sniper at Clive Bundy's spread.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:02 PM
Jan 2015

I refuse to glorify that by paying to see a movie glorifying snipers. It's also the reason I'll never watch "Rampage", which was pretty violent and what was also about an American sniper murdering people he didn't like.

Not sure why everyone is flocking to it.

Really? Might it have something to do with Americans' love (festish?) for and with guns and violence while hypocritically claiming to love peace and tranquility?
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
38. Very remote chance of me seeing it. I don't go to the movies nor do I own a TVEE.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:29 PM
Jan 2015

That's not to say it might not be on one year at a friends house and I watch it with them. So, maybe in a few years by chance.

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
39. No thanks. Seen too much of it already in the promos.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:32 PM
Jan 2015

And reading a bit about this guy in real life is more than enough.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
44. Hell no
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:41 PM
Jan 2015

I'm sure Bradley Cooper gives a layered, terrific performance which I was a big fan of in The Place Beyond the Lines or it is faithful to the Chris Kyle story and rambo patriotism strikes me as the motivation behind this flick.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
47. I may add it to my Netflix queue, but probably not.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:46 PM
Jan 2015

Subject matter of the film, and I'm starting to OD on Bradley Cooper.

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
51. This film is making hella money..why?
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 03:39 PM
Jan 2015

More than Black Hawk Down, The Hurt Locker...I think it's done an all time Jan. record. Like $90M. So why? Clint Eastwood? Not Bradley Cooper, he's not THAT big of a star

EX500rider

(10,829 posts)
63. I haven't seen it...but if Eastwood did as good of a job as he did with "Letters From Iwo Jima"
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 06:40 PM
Jan 2015

...then it's probably very good.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
54. Ick.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 03:49 PM
Jan 2015

Being just now in the process of pulling my head out of criminal forensic psychology, & have no intention of sticking my head back into a sewer of psychopathy and general psychopathology.

atreides1

(16,068 posts)
57. Don't plan to see it
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 04:01 PM
Jan 2015

If I want to watch a movie about a psychopathic serial killer, with illusions of grandeur, I'll watch 'Silence of the Lambs' next time it's on TV.

It's a lot more entertaining and Sir Anthony Hopkins is much better actor...

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
65. Movies like this make me really miss Roger Ebert.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 06:44 PM
Jan 2015

I really loved his reviews. They were thoughtful and honest and actually made me want to go to the movies based on what he said.

This one, however: I will wait until I can watch it at home. Honestly I know that the gunshots in the theatre will be too loud for me.

I don't think he is a hero or a villain, I suspect this person is somewhere in between, and for all his political faults, I like Eastwood movies.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
66. Just saw it. Well done but very disturbing.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 06:53 PM
Jan 2015

For one, no mention that the Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. So this poor guy killed alot people for nothing, imo. He certainly was a brave incredible soldier but had we had Democratic President at the time I doubt he would even have been put in that situation. Such a waste of lives on all sides.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
68. A scene in Boyhood
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 10:05 PM
Jan 2015

saw one character tell his children that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Go see it. Great film.

6000eliot

(5,643 posts)
67. Never saw a single film about the "War on Terror," 9/11, or the Iraq War.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 07:05 PM
Jan 2015

Never will. I can make up fairy stories myself that are much more pleasant and have no need to know what corporations want me to think and feel about these things.

 

Ramses

(721 posts)
69. Not interested in a story about a guy who killed dozens of people and brags about it
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 10:19 PM
Jan 2015

classic American propaganda

 

dissentient

(861 posts)
70. No, war movies are boring
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 10:46 PM
Jan 2015

to me. I can't think of one war movie that I liked. That is, one based on reality and real wars.

I'd much rather see an alien invasion type sci-fi movie if I want to see a movie with war action.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did you see American Snip...