Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gopiscrap

(23,756 posts)
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:15 PM Jan 2015

Should the Patriots be made to forfeit Sunday's game?

It is has been reported by ESPN and Yahoo Sports that sources with in the NFL have indicted that a preliminary investigation as shown that 11 of the 12 footballs used by the Patriots in Sunday's game were under-inflated by 2lbs psi or more. If this is proven should the Patriots be made to forfeit and have the Colts go to the Super Bowl instead?


72 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
36 (50%)
No
34 (47%)
re-play Colts-Patriots game this Sunday in MA
0 (0%)
re-play Colts-Patriots game this Sunday and have them lose home field advantage
2 (3%)
re-ply Colt-Patriots game this Sunday in Neutral location
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
197 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should the Patriots be made to forfeit Sunday's game? (Original Post) gopiscrap Jan 2015 OP
We don't know how long the Patriots have been doing this, right? petronius Jan 2015 #1
Let's expel Seattle from the NFL former9thward Jan 2015 #5
Good luck with that AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #29
It will happen at the same time former9thward Jan 2015 #55
Good luck with that AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #64
One of the former Seahawks who was suspended is now a Patriot. opiate69 Jan 2015 #90
Yes, Brandon Browner AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #113
He was one of my favorite seahawks as well. opiate69 Jan 2015 #115
In Seattle, he could have smoked all the super "bowls" he wanted n/t eridani Jan 2015 #185
No one has innocent hands in the NFL. former9thward Jan 2015 #152
Wait, didn't we already do that? No?!? petronius Jan 2015 #187
Did the NFL check the Colts' balls too? House of Roberts Jan 2015 #2
yes pintobean Jan 2015 #28
That's even funnier than the OP! zappaman Jan 2015 #65
I wanted to go with a pintobean Jan 2015 #110
DUzy! riqster Jan 2015 #140
It must be Super Bowl time sharp_stick Jan 2015 #3
appears the Super Bowl is hfojvt Jan 2015 #26
That was profound! AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #31
As is this... sharp_stick Jan 2015 #34
lol AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #37
I try to educate sharp_stick Jan 2015 #51
U mad bro? AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #61
Not really sharp_stick Feb 2015 #193
Mad enough... AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #194
Well that was just for kicks sharp_stick Feb 2015 #195
It won't 'disappear' AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #196
Don't worry sharp_stick Feb 2015 #197
Some people believe that cheating is wrong mythology Jan 2015 #78
Actually I prefer sharp_stick Jan 2015 #80
Yes, that it happened is one thing pipi_k Jan 2015 #138
Yeah, cause 11 out of 12 footballs are going to just lose 2 lbs of air... Drahthaardogs Jan 2015 #177
Too much money involved. OffWithTheirHeads Jan 2015 #4
Couldn't possibly care any less. 99Forever Jan 2015 #6
Sports is really only relevant F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #95
I'm always amazed at how seriously people take this stuff (including members of my immediate family) Arugula Latte Jan 2015 #108
I feel the same way about magazine covers. nt. RiffRandell Jan 2015 #144
+ antiquie Jan 2015 #154
bingo! opiate69 Jan 2015 #188
If true, the Patriots cheated. Avalux Jan 2015 #7
As would the refs KamaAina Jan 2015 #14
We need to check Walt Coleman's bank account stat Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #19
Nice post, Alex Jones! KamaAina Jan 2015 #21
ESPN lies to us!!! Initech Jan 2015 #59
Well, they are based in Connecticut KamaAina Jan 2015 #66
True. Refs, and all of the players, handle enough footballs to know when they are soft or not. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2015 #23
Yes but may not have noticed since they don't grip and squeeze it. Avalux Jan 2015 #30
Yes they do grip and squeeze it sharp_stick Jan 2015 #43
Thank you for explaining. Avalux Jan 2015 #45
So did Luck and his Center. The same balls are used by both teams. berni_mccoy Jan 2015 #79
Then why did ESPN say the only way they knew was when the ball was intercepted? Avalux Jan 2015 #84
Each team has it's own set of balls AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #89
Not exactly. Each team is allowed it's own set of balls, but only the home team is required hughee99 Jan 2015 #105
That is correct. You should also notice on all change of possessions, though joeglow3 Jan 2015 #124
The balls used for kicking plays are different. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2015 #127
Irrelevent AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #88
I thought so too, but that is not true. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #160
Possible but not likely. former9thward Jan 2015 #168
The refs may not have "noticed it" because it's not uncommon... hughee99 Jan 2015 #103
Super Bowl liberal from boston Jan 2015 #48
They change balls frequently. jeff47 Jan 2015 #129
Each team has its own balls truebluegreen Jan 2015 #178
"If true, the Patriots cheated." Uh, no. MANative Jan 2015 #17
The balls they supplied the colts AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #35
I've not heard anything about that yet. Lots of questions about whether they even weighed... MANative Jan 2015 #44
They checked all the balls AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #53
Do you have a link to back that up? onenote Jan 2015 #148
Obviously it isn't an issue with the NFL AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #149
That's not the same as saying that the league checked the Colts' footballs when the checked the Pats onenote Jan 2015 #151
It is looking like only the Patriots balls were deflated AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #166
Yep. We should know more. onenote Jan 2015 #173
I was at the game and I can tell you Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #57
Irrelevent AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #67
Enjoy the haterade Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #68
Right, it's 'hate' AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #71
Sorry, jealousy Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #74
Weird AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #75
No Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #77
Wait, the plot thickens! AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #81
Yes the Colts had their balls deflated in that game too Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #82
Haha Nyc72dem Jan 2015 #85
Yeah, sure they did AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #167
Colts were home team 4Q2u2 Jan 2015 #161
So cheating is acceptable AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #175
Ever Hear of Suck for Luck 4Q2u2 Jan 2015 #190
I agree with you but it seems that many of the good liberals here think cheating doesn't matter adigal Jan 2015 #40
I totally agree! gopiscrap Jan 2015 #87
No, but huge fines and take away draft picks. (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #8
That'll likely be the punishment FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #20
A fine and the loss of a draft pick after illegally spying didn't stop this mythology Jan 2015 #96
The Seahawks have one of the highest number of PED violations. BillZBubb Jan 2015 #104
How many have they had this season? opiate69 Jan 2015 #111
Absolutely not. PeteSelman Jan 2015 #9
Oh, come on. Orrex Jan 2015 #12
Well, That Quantifies It Perfectly ProfessorGAC Jan 2015 #145
If it is just whining AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #42
Because that's what some writers desperately hope to happen Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #52
Ah, that explains it AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #54
My mistake Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #58
The Pats are the most succesfful franchise over the past decade or so...because? Threedifferentones Jan 2015 #93
Aww Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #94
Ya, uh huh. Threedifferentones Jan 2015 #98
This makes my red, white and blue blood boil Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #99
"Caught cheating (other than PEDs) ZERO TIMES". Fucking classic! 11 Bravo Jan 2015 #107
Ya, the leader of the Pats should have resigned after getting caught the first time. Threedifferentones Jan 2015 #112
Yes... other than offering bounties for knocking players out of games (Saints), hughee99 Jan 2015 #153
New Orleans Saints, for paying their players to intentionally injure opposing team players Dont call me Shirley Jan 2015 #164
I Agree, Given The Pats History, This Should Be Investigated... Corey_Baker08 Jan 2015 #179
This all day d_b Jan 2015 #159
The NCAA should vacate their 110 victories Orrex Jan 2015 #10
Given the team's history sarisataka Jan 2015 #11
The definitive word on the subject KamaAina Jan 2015 #13
He sure is rabid - an example of moral relativism adigal Jan 2015 #47
No, but belicheck should be suspended for the game. cleanhippie Jan 2015 #15
He should be flat out banned. Initech Jan 2015 #56
I can't disagree. cleanhippie Jan 2015 #60
That doesn't go far enough Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #16
At a minimum, the Pats should forfeit a whole lot of draft picks. Paladin Jan 2015 #18
Can someone explain this to me... JackRiddler Jan 2015 #22
nope 12 per side plus x amount for special teams rbrnmw Jan 2015 #36
What? JackRiddler Jan 2015 #38
He is saying dsc Jan 2015 #106
I believe the Colts brought their own balls as is custom since 2005(?) Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #114
all the accounts I have read stated that the home team supplies all the balls dsc Jan 2015 #117
nope each team supplies 12 offense balls for their team. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #162
Each team supplies their own balls for offensive play. Balls for kickoffs are... MANative Jan 2015 #39
The home team supplies all the balls AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #70
The digest of the rules you cite is not the official rulebook onenote Jan 2015 #150
No, each team provides 12 balls for their offense to use. cleanhippie Jan 2015 #50
Gee, it's funny shenmue Jan 2015 #24
Why don't the ref's or NFL supply the balls? FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #25
Indeed. JackRiddler Jan 2015 #102
That was my question too. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #119
I imagine it is an old policy and the NFL hates to change it to give the Refs even more power Johonny Jan 2015 #139
Absolutely not. At worst, they should be fined $275K and *possibly* lost a first round draft pick. MohRokTah Jan 2015 #27
The Ravens should play the Colts this weekend pintobean Jan 2015 #32
No we have no proof they did anything yet. Nyc72dem Jan 2015 #33
if you read the poll question correctly gopiscrap Jan 2015 #41
Oh oh if PROVEN .... Nyc72dem Jan 2015 #46
I vote no. nilesobek Jan 2015 #49
It's going to be a great game Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #63
Yeah it gives those shock jocks on ESPN radio something to talk about. nilesobek Jan 2015 #69
I'm thinking it's going to be a one score game Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #76
Lmao! RiffRandell Jan 2015 #142
I voted no benld74 Jan 2015 #62
It's too late to forfeit the game. dilby Jan 2015 #72
Those balls don't account for the Colts lousy performance with Pathwalker Jan 2015 #73
Couldn't have said it better Nyc72dem Jan 2015 #83
Actually they may. opiate69 Jan 2015 #86
The Colts had their own balls when they missed the field goals, Pathwalker Jan 2015 #91
Patriots still would have won, but that doesn't brendan120678 Jan 2015 #146
If proven true, they will be, according to NFL rules, Pathwalker Jan 2015 #156
"I Misinterpreted The Rules" The Great Escape Jan 2015 #92
Know as much about football as I know about golf and I don't even know which end you hold the caddy Douglas Carpenter Jan 2015 #97
The Scotts invented the game Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #101
The Scotts call themselves "Scots". nt truebluegreen Jan 2015 #180
No. That isn't a possible punishment and we have two "reports" underpants Jan 2015 #100
Does each side use only its own balls on offense? aint_no_life_nowhere Jan 2015 #109
Three sets of footbals: one set for Colts offense, one set for Patriots offense, one set for Kickers Iggo Jan 2015 #122
They should replay the game and the Patriots have to wear bread bags over their shoes! Sancho Jan 2015 #116
Thank you! That's the best answer yet!!! gopiscrap Jan 2015 #125
Pats are disgraced enough. no to forfeit. Denis 11 Jan 2015 #118
The refs should be banned from post season games for a season. aikoaiko Jan 2015 #120
Not until deflategate is proven to NOT be a false flag operation. Kaleva Jan 2015 #121
I don't like forfeit as a penalty jmowreader Jan 2015 #123
Yeah let's check every ball every game Nyc72dem Jan 2015 #126
Either that, or get away from this ironclad rule jmowreader Jan 2015 #141
Watch the owner say: gopiscrap Jan 2015 #128
I wonder why Rush Limbaugh hasn't said that already shenmue Jan 2015 #133
Not forfeit, but I suppose the league should... brendan120678 Jan 2015 #130
I agree Belicheck should be banned gopiscrap Jan 2015 #132
The only time they've banned is for gambling and... when someone got caught doing exactly what the Johonny Jan 2015 #136
Nah. hifiguy Jan 2015 #131
But it's still cheating if true gopiscrap Jan 2015 #135
Now you might see a rule change where the refs control game balls up to kick off... Johonny Jan 2015 #134
I do think this is a serious problem shenmue Jan 2015 #137
Replay the game in Iraq using a soccer ball. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #143
Pats haven't won a super bowl since spygate. LeftOfWest Jan 2015 #147
Whatasillyquestion! Stephen Retired Jan 2015 #155
At least their alleged crime isn't criminal, like a certain coach who paid his players to injure Dont call me Shirley Jan 2015 #157
who did that? gopiscrap Jan 2015 #171
"saints" 2012 Dont call me Shirley Jan 2015 #172
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #158
How though? Cancel the Superbowl? Reter Jan 2015 #163
Option 6: go out and see a movie on Sunday... brooklynite Jan 2015 #165
I don't really have an opinion Blue_In_AK Jan 2015 #169
Too late. It's past. Let the game begin! cheapdate Jan 2015 #170
Yes. Has me thinking, how much in common does this have with the Black Sox. closeupready Jan 2015 #174
folks in indiana are pretty pissed spanone Jan 2015 #176
This has to stop machI Jan 2015 #181
Cheating is rewarded by our society abelenkpe Jan 2015 #182
I'm missing something. Doesn't the other team use the same balol? n/t eridani Jan 2015 #183
Definitely, unquestionably YES. liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #184
They should be allowed to only use deflated balls Generic Brad Jan 2015 #186
By the time I get to Arizona Capt. Obvious Jan 2015 #189
Preposterous suggestion oberliner Jan 2015 #191
Whoever voted "yes" is crazy taught_me_patience Jan 2015 #192

petronius

(26,602 posts)
1. We don't know how long the Patriots have been doing this, right?
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:17 PM
Jan 2015

It seems only fair that they should forfeit every single game they've ever won, and the entire staff should pay back every dollar of salary they've ever received. And Tom Brady's SNL appearance should be irretrievably scrubbed from the replay cycle...

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
5. Let's expel Seattle from the NFL
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jan 2015

Because of Pete Carroll's history of providing drugs to players while we are at it.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
64. Good luck with that
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:54 PM
Jan 2015

Seriously, the Brady's need all the help they can get. I don't think the Brady's have ever beaten Wilson.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
90. One of the former Seahawks who was suspended is now a Patriot.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:28 PM
Jan 2015

Cheatriot fans gonna start demanding Brandon Browner sit out the super bowl then?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
113. Yes, Brandon Browner
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:37 PM
Jan 2015

He is one of my favorite players. He didn't cheat, he smoked weed when he was in the CFL in Canada, and they tried to carry it over to the NFL.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
115. He was one of my favorite seahawks as well.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:46 PM
Jan 2015

My point being, though, if we're going to hold the current seahawks responsible for past transgressions, then let's be consistent. Especially considering the fact that all of the players who were actually disciplined for breaking the rules are presently former Seahawks.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
187. Wait, didn't we already do that? No?!?
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:30 AM
Jan 2015

Damn, we are way, way behind on our clean-up-the-NFL to-do list. What are our leaders thinking?

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
34. As is this...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:35 PM
Jan 2015

Putting nt into the "message text" part of your reply negates the meaning of nt.

You need to put it in the message text so you look like you know what you're doing.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
194. Mad enough...
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 08:35 PM
Feb 2015

...to dig up a two week old thread and publicly lick your wounds...

Now the big question is, since they have proven they can win a game without cheating, should they be given a pass for it? I don't believe they should be given a pass. Cheating is cheating, don't you agree?

And what punishment should they face? Lose next years first round draft pick, or because they have cheated before, something harsher? The league says they will deal with this in about a week. Personally I think if the team was in on it, they should lose another first round pick and the coach should be suspended. If it was just Brady that cheated, as Belichick insinuated, he should be banned from ever getting into the hall of fame and suspended for a year.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
195. Well that was just for kicks
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 09:11 PM
Feb 2015

because you pulled up a 2 year old clip to be a funny and I thought you liked Sherman clips. I bookmarked it just in case.

I think Richard Sherman is the best corner in the NFL and his ability to speak truth to power is a breath of fresh air but I'm still happy as hell that he's going to spend the off season going "what if".

But as for punishment, how about nothing because it's become pretty clear the whole thing was a load of shit to begin with.

There's a reason it's disappeared from the media, nothing happened. One ball at 2 psi under reg...maybe somebody stepped on it, maybe it had a weak seam. The rest, not so much.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000466783/article/more-details-on-the-investigation-of-patriots-deflated-footballs

Then again, if it's found out they did it I'd say a fine and loss of a draft pick exactly as written in the rules would be about right.

And as for licking my wounds, when I watch Tom Brady carry that trophy past the Boston Marathon finish line, I'll be done licking my wounds.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
196. It won't 'disappear'
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 09:55 PM
Feb 2015

The NFL stated they wouldn't start their investigation until after the super bowl.

I don't think the league will accept, "Someone must have stepped on one of the footballs" as a valid explanation for 11 balls being flat. Stepping on one football won't make 11 footballs go flat or lose air, sorry lol.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
197. Don't worry
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 10:04 PM
Feb 2015

even though I know you don't want to read the nfl.com article.

The sad will pass, even the worst butthurt of having the 12th man proven a child is only temporary.

I'll send you some pics from the parade.

?w=1000&h=542

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
78. Some people believe that cheating is wrong
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:05 PM
Jan 2015

Apparently you aren't one of them.

It's not whining to expect a team to play by the rules. The Patriots have opted to not do that.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
80. Actually I prefer
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:10 PM
Jan 2015

to wait until the report is out before determining what happened, not doing so constitutes whining.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
138. Yes, that it happened is one thing
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jan 2015

HOW it happened is quite another.


Even if it involves something the Pats had nothing to do with, there will still be those who prefer to believe the worst.


I liken it to the Birther crowd, who, years later and after being shown multiple times that Obama is indeed a US citizen still believe there's a conspiracy afoot.

God himself could come out of the sky and announce that Obama is a US citizen and they wouldn't accept it.


Much the same with this issue. If the NFL proves that no Patriots player or staff altered those balls in any way, some haters will think they're in on some huge conspiracy

Let's not even consider the idiocy of thinking that a team with the weapons the Patriots have might be forced to cheat against a team that just happened to beat a badly injured Peyton Manning the week before. My grandma probably could have beaten Manning with the injury he had.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
177. Yeah, cause 11 out of 12 footballs are going to just lose 2 lbs of air...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 06:59 PM
Jan 2015

I looked at the physics today. Even accounting for STP, a 5-7% loss could be attributable to temperature change. A 16% change cannot. Face it, Bill Belicheat is like that guy you know that has a great girl at home and still has to hit on every woman he sees. He just cannot help himself.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
95. Sports is really only relevant
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:37 PM
Jan 2015

In how it reflects societal attitudes and ideas.

And as a side note, you would not believe the looks I've gotten when I tell people I don't care in the slightest whether the Seahawks won or not (I'm in Seattle). People get annoyed with you for not knowing when the Super Bowl is. Uber-nationalism is scary, be it for a sports team or for a country.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
108. I'm always amazed at how seriously people take this stuff (including members of my immediate family)
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:21 PM
Jan 2015

I'll never get it. But, I get that I'm outside the norm in the US of A, and not just in my attitude towards sports.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
7. If true, the Patriots cheated.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jan 2015

There's a lot at stake here I realize so it won't happen, but the MFers should be sitting at home on Superbowl Sunday.

I'd like to see them forfeit entirely. They'll have an excuse though, maybe blame the pump and say it wasn't calibrated correctly, or something like that.

If the Colts defensive back knew the ball was under-inflated when he caught it, the Patriots would have known too, even if the under inflation was inadvertent.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
19. We need to check Walt Coleman's bank account stat
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:27 PM
Jan 2015

see if any mysterious deposits were made this weekend.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
30. Yes but may not have noticed since they don't grip and squeeze it.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jan 2015

Brady definitely knew, so did the center, and anyone catching the ball.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
43. Yes they do grip and squeeze it
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:39 PM
Jan 2015

Especially every time a new ball comes onto the field, it's part of the job to check the ball before it's put into play.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
84. Then why did ESPN say the only way they knew was when the ball was intercepted?
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:19 PM
Jan 2015

That meant to me that each team uses the balls their own balls.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
105. Not exactly. Each team is allowed it's own set of balls, but only the home team is required
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:19 PM
Jan 2015

to provide up to 12 additional balls. The visiting team has the option to bring 12 additional balls or not.
http://static.nfl.com/static/content/public/image/rulebook/pdfs/5_2013_Ball.pdf


Rule 2 The Ball
Section 1
BALL DIMENSIONS
The Ball must be a “Wilson,” hand selected, bearing the signature of the Commissioner of the League, Roger Goodell.
The ball shall be made up of an inflated (12 1/2 to 13 1/2 pounds) urethane bladder enclosed in a pebble grained, leather case (natural tan color) without corrugations of any kind. It shall have the form of a prolate spheroid and the size and weight shall be: long axis, 11 to 11 1/4 inches; long circumference, 28 to 28 1/2 inches; short circumference, 21 to 21 1/4 inches; weight, 14 to 15 ounces.
The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.

Section 2
BALL SUPPLY
Each team will make 12 primary balls available for testing by the Referee two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game to meet League requirements. The home team will also make 12 backup balls available for testing in all stadiums. In addition, the visitors, at their discretion, may bring 12 backup balls to be tested by the Referee for games held in outdoor stadiums. For all games, eight new footballs, sealed in a special box and shipped by the manufacturer to the Referee, will be opened in the officials’ locker room two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game.

These balls are to be specially marked by the Referee and used exclusively for the kicking game.
In the event a home team ball does not conform to specifications, or its supply is exhausted, the Referee shall secure a proper
ball from the visitors and, failing that, use the best available ball. Any such circumstances must be reported to the Commissioner.
In case of rain or a wet, muddy, or slippery field, a playable ball shall be used at the request of the offensive team’s center.
The Game Clock shall not stop for such action (unless undue delay occurs).
Note: It is the responsibility of the home team to furnish playable balls at all times by attendants from either side of the playing
field

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
124. That is correct. You should also notice on all change of possessions, though
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:15 PM
Jan 2015

i.e. kick offs and punts.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
160. I thought so too, but that is not true.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:41 PM
Jan 2015

Both teams supply 12 balls two hours before the game. Those balls are checked and controlled by the refs. Then each team has control over their 12 balls for the duration of the game, with a designated "ball boy" in charge of the team's balls. Each team supplies the ball for the game while their team is on offense.

I think that is the procedure, more or less. It is certainly possible for the ball boy to deflate balls.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
103. The refs may not have "noticed it" because it's not uncommon...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:07 PM
Jan 2015

I've heard reports now that the Colts noticed this back in November (not sure why deflation would be necessary in a dome, though), that the Ravens noticed it last week, and that the Carolina kicker noticed it in a game unrelated to the Patriots. Is this one of those rules that's not really enforced strictly, at least until a complaint is made about it? It could be that everyone noticed it. If you watch an NFL game, you'll notice the refs are constantly griping, throwing and catching the ball in the process of setting the ball up for play. I don't believe it's possible they wouldn't notice a significant under-inflation, but find it somewhat likely they didn't care.

48. Super Bowl
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jan 2015

I never liked football & my question is probably stupid but if the Patriots benefited from the deflated football the Colts would have benefited also??? Local news reported use of deflated footballs was used in just 1/2 of the game. Also weather was a factor as it was really raining.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
129. They change balls frequently.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:35 PM
Jan 2015

Also kicking plays use different balls than "regular" plays. So the Colts could have used properly-inflated balls, while the Patriots used under-inflated balls.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
17. "If true, the Patriots cheated." Uh, no.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:26 PM
Jan 2015

Utterly inconclusive until they determine how and why the balls were deflated. The meteorologist on our local station talked about this being a common occurrence. It's why you lose tire pressure in the winter. Graham Gano of the Panthers was quoted as saying that the balls regularly deflate in cold weather. Aaron Rodgers was quoted as saying that he prefers balls overinflated. Brad Johnson says he paid to have the balls scuffed up for the SB in 2003.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
35. The balls they supplied the colts
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:36 PM
Jan 2015

...were not under inflated. 11 of the 12 balls the Brady's used were under inflated. Lame.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
44. I've not heard anything about that yet. Lots of questions about whether they even weighed...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:39 PM
Jan 2015

the Colts' balls.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
53. They checked all the balls
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:48 PM
Jan 2015
Brady said in 2011 he likes deflated footballs

Why some quarterbacks prefer under inflated footballs

Even if they deflated all the balls to give Brady an edge, it's cheating. Obviously, Brady was aware of it, he is the one handling it all game long. Brady himself should be fined.

onenote

(42,698 posts)
148. Do you have a link to back that up?
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:10 PM
Jan 2015

The links you posted say nothing about which balls were checked by the NFL.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
149. Obviously it isn't an issue with the NFL
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:20 PM
Jan 2015

Or at least they aren't saying anything at this time. They are focusing on the Patriots balls, which would have been deflated after they were inspected by the officiating crew.

onenote

(42,698 posts)
151. That's not the same as saying that the league checked the Colts' footballs when the checked the Pats
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:24 PM
Jan 2015

Its a rather significant issue if the during/post game check of the footballs was limited to the Pats footballs.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
166. It is looking like only the Patriots balls were deflated
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:54 PM
Jan 2015

Which, if true, means they cheated.

Former NFL official Gerry Austin said he believes someone purposely let the air of out those footballs.

"My understanding is all 12 balls were under the 13 pounds (per square inch), but 11 of them were more than two pounds under the 13 pounds," he said on the "Mike & Mike" show on ESPN Radio on Wednesday morning. "I take away from that, somebody has let some air out of the balls. Do I have knowledge of whether they did or not? Both teams balls were brought in at halftime to my understanding and all 24 balls were checked. The Colts balls were still up to 13 pounds and the Patriots balls were not."

http://www.newsday.com/sports/football/report-colts-told-nfl-about-patriots-deflated-footballs-in-november-1.9829583

We will know in a couple days...

onenote

(42,698 posts)
173. Yep. We should know more.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 06:27 PM
Jan 2015

I have to say, however (and I'm not pinning this on you), the photo of under inflated footballs accompanying the Newsday story is bizarre. It gives the impression that the balls in question looked like those in the photo, which simply is not possible.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
81. Wait, the plot thickens!
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:13 PM
Jan 2015

Apparently they did the same thing last November against the Colts, so the league was already aware and watching for it! This is not looking good for the Bradys!

Colts Told NFL Pats Were Deflating Balls in November

 

4Q2u2

(1,406 posts)
161. Colts were home team
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:42 PM
Jan 2015

They control the balls and the ballboy is an employee of the Colts for the November game.
I bet you would not hear one word of this if the Colts won.
Pats knew Arron Rogers over inflates his footballs, they lost to him. They shut up and moved on, knowing the outcome is about how you play. If you lose, it was your fault and nobody else'. Losers whine about how other things made them lose.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28969-2004Sep17.html
http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/5423839-74/cowher-patriots-game#axzz3PUeQfyia

Too many others to list.



 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
175. So cheating is acceptable
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 06:33 PM
Jan 2015

Because the Patriots apparently have no issues with teams doing it?

Ever heard of integrity?

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
40. I agree with you but it seems that many of the good liberals here think cheating doesn't matter
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:38 PM
Jan 2015

And yes, the Patriots would have won anyway. That it totally and completely besides the point. This was blatant cheating and a fine and loss of draft pick, which is a very high number anyway because they had a good season, is a joke. The NFL is a total joke. AND it is nonprofit, which should immediately be revoked.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
20. That'll likely be the punishment
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:27 PM
Jan 2015

Fines won't do much, but losing a 1st round draft pick would keep this from happening again.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
96. A fine and the loss of a draft pick after illegally spying didn't stop this
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:39 PM
Jan 2015

No, Belichick needs to be banned and the game forfeited.

Unfortunately the NFL will put off any punishment until after the Super Bowl and it will be a pathetic slap on the wrist. And in the future there will be another incident of Belichick cheating because he either isn't good enough, or doesn't believe he's good enough to win without it.

As somebody who is an athlete, I find it utterly pathetic that people would cheat to win and can still look in the mirror. But it's not just the Patriots. Seattle says they have the best defense in the NFL but lead the league in players suspended for performance enhancing drugs and that's with Richard Sherman squirming his way out of a suspension on a technicality.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
9. Absolutely not.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:22 PM
Jan 2015

They won by 38 points. They would have won no matter what they played with. There's no way this made a bit of difference. Just more whining from teams that lost.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
12. Oh, come on.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:22 PM
Jan 2015

If they hadn't cheated, they would likely have won by only 35 points. Big difference!

ProfessorGAC

(64,998 posts)
145. Well, That Quantifies It Perfectly
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jan 2015

2 psig is about worth 3 points of margin in a victory this convincing.

Threedifferentones

(1,070 posts)
93. The Pats are the most succesfful franchise over the past decade or so...because?
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:32 PM
Jan 2015

Over the past decade they have been caught cheating now TWICE. During that span other teams have been caught cheating (other than PEDs)...wait for it...ZERO TIMES.

Thirty one teams have not been caught cheating at all. One has been caught cheating now twice. That team is the most successful team in the league.

But that is obviously just a coincidence.

Losing a first round pick is a joke. Fines to these millionaires are jokes.

The Pats got fined and lost a pick the last time they got caught cheating and have continued to win and win. Of course we now know they have continued to cheat...but that's NOT the reason they win!

After all, a coach who tampers with game balls and video tapes other teams' signals must be winning because he is just much more clever at "scheming"...lol, that's the best pun I've made this week!

Threedifferentones

(1,070 posts)
98. Ya, uh huh.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:47 PM
Jan 2015

The reason an honest sport clamps down extra hard on cheaters is the suspicion that a person who breaks one rule will break more if he thinks he can get away with it. You'll post pithy come backs instead of substantive counter points because there are no counters to something so obviously true.

I'm not an NFL fan really, I only watch some of the playoff games and pretty much none of the regular season. If the Pats were honest I would be impressed by their dynastic ways.

Your post implies that I'm only writing this because I'm upset the Pats win. But, I spend little time thinking about football. You're the one with the Pats logo as your icon on a political message board.

Your post is thus ironic. You dismiss our undeniable criticisms because to admit that your heroes are cheats would cause you too much pain.

Really, it's just a game, and your attitude is childish. You're not even on the team, you should get over it and support someone who plays by the rules.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
107. "Caught cheating (other than PEDs) ZERO TIMES". Fucking classic!
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:20 PM
Jan 2015

Richard Nixon: Accused of violating his oath of office and committing high crimes and misdemeanors (other than that Watergate thing) ZERO TIMES".

There's faulty logic, and then there's … whatever the Hell that was.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
153. Yes... other than offering bounties for knocking players out of games (Saints),
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:27 PM
Jan 2015

coaches tripping players who were running down the field out of bounds (Jets), and, of course, heating up footballs during a cold weather game (Vikings/Panthers game this season - it's in the same section of rules as the inflation pressure). The NFL was so concerned about the last one that they asked the teams not to do that anymore AND, I believe, issued a memo to all teams that you can't warm up the game balls with a sideline heater.

Not counting PED's, of course.

 

d_b

(7,463 posts)
159. This all day
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:41 PM
Jan 2015

(Giants fan here) Pats would have wiped their asses with the colts either way: deflated footballs, beach balls, mothballs, whatever.

If the league can prove bill had a hand in this, fine - take away their picks. If not, stay salty, my friends.



Orrex

(63,203 posts)
10. The NCAA should vacate their 110 victories
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:22 PM
Jan 2015

And then give them back after a lot of self-aggrandizing wailing and gnashing of teeth.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
11. Given the team's history
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:22 PM
Jan 2015

of cheating and clearly past sanctions have not worked, declaring the game forfeit seems reasonable.

Paladin

(28,252 posts)
18. At a minimum, the Pats should forfeit a whole lot of draft picks.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:27 PM
Jan 2015

They're getting a well-deserved reputation as a thug organization.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
22. Can someone explain this to me...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jan 2015

Same ball for both teams, right? What are the effects of ball under-inflation such that it privileges either? What are the specifics of this supposed plot? How does it given an advantage to the Patriots?

dsc

(52,155 posts)
106. He is saying
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:20 PM
Jan 2015

that there are three different supplies of balls provided. 12 go for when the Patriots are on offence, 12 for when the Colts are on offence, and another supply when special teams (punting, field goals, kickoffs). The Patriots supplied all three of the sets of balls. Off the 12 for when the Patriots were on offence 11 were underinflated. Apparently none of the rest were.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
114. I believe the Colts brought their own balls as is custom since 2005(?)
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:45 PM
Jan 2015

They didn't make it to the field though.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
117. all the accounts I have read stated that the home team supplies all the balls
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:51 PM
Jan 2015

with the usage as I have outlined. If it is what you are saying that mitigates it some in my mind but again I have read 3 different accounts all stating what I said.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
39. Each team supplies their own balls for offensive play. Balls for kickoffs are...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:38 PM
Jan 2015

provided by the NFL.

Better grip in wet weather.

No plot alleged or uncovered as of this morning. Could be purely circumstantial. Balls (like the tires on your car) deflate in cold weather, especially after having been in a warm locker room.

They need to have checked the Colts' balls too. The same could have been true of theirs. If they didn't, it's gross investigatory incompetence. And BTW, the refs handled those balls on every single down. If there had been a problem, they should have raised it a lot earlier.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
70. The home team supplies all the balls
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:58 PM
Jan 2015

Digest of Rules Main
Ball
The home club shall have 36 balls for outdoor games and 24 for indoor games available for testing with a pressure gauge by the referee two hours prior to the starting time of the game to meet with League requirements. Twelve (12) new footballs, sealed in a special box and shipped by the manufacturer, will be opened in the officials’ locker room two hours prior to the starting time of the game. These balls are to be specially marked with the letter "k" and used exclusively for the kicking game.

http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/ball

onenote

(42,698 posts)
150. The digest of the rules you cite is not the official rulebook
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/digestofrules

The official rulebook, which is cited above, states the rules surrounding the provision of footballs (including the period in advance of the game when the balls must be checked) differently than the digest. And the digest takes a back seat to the rulebook.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
25. Why don't the ref's or NFL supply the balls?
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jan 2015

Seems like allowing each team to supply the ball is just opening the door to cheating.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
102. Indeed.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:03 PM
Jan 2015

It's opening the door to both, cheating and to bullshit controversies. But oh wait, TV pays most of the bills, and needs to fill many empty days between games, so bullshit controversies have to be found or made, one way or another.

Johonny

(20,834 posts)
139. I imagine it is an old policy and the NFL hates to change it to give the Refs even more power
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:48 PM
Jan 2015

They don't want to do anything to helps the Refs union and their claim to be full time employees. Given the refs are part time, the NFL goes out of the way to low ball them in salary, and they control many aspects of the game; I've always imagined the NFL referees are very susceptible to cheating in many forms as well. One might assume the NFL has a lot of problems with cheating and does little to curb it.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
27. Absolutely not. At worst, they should be fined $275K and *possibly* lost a first round draft pick.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:30 PM
Jan 2015

The rules call for a $25K fine for over or under inflating a game ball and possible other sanctions.

Forfeiture of a game already decided goes beyond the pale.

 

Nyc72dem

(63 posts)
46. Oh oh if PROVEN ....
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:43 PM
Jan 2015

If it was proven that Tom Brady had a safety pin on him then fine ban him and send him to Iraq.

Now for reality...the Ravens say the ball was deflated in their game too?!? Ha! Yeah ok. Pile it in guys.

Why didn't the Ravens bring it up then? They were too busy saying the Patriots cheated on formations. Good lord. Anything else?!?

And didn't this issue get resolved during halftime? Wasn't that when they checked the balls and found them "deflated"? So they must have fixed it. Then with the new improved balls the Patriots scored 28 points and Indy nothing.

THEY COULD HAVE PLAYED WITH A HAM and still won.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
49. I vote no.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jan 2015

This stupid ball controversy has served to alert the Seahawks that Belicek hasn't stopped thinking and scheming. The Patriots should be viewed as a five-alarm fire. Pete Carroll will have all hands on deck. I heard they are going to play defensive starters on special teams.

Its too bad this might mar the final game in some way. I don't care if they are playing with ping-pong balls. Seahawks are ready.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
63. It's going to be a great game
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:53 PM
Jan 2015

I hope the media talks about nothing but the Patriots balls for the next two weeks.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
69. Yeah it gives those shock jocks on ESPN radio something to talk about.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:58 PM
Jan 2015

Lets face it. They can only run through the matchups and repeat their broadcasts so many times.

As a fanatic I'm a lot more worried about the tackle eligible play that the Patriots are running. A legal play. I'm sure the Seahawks are working on that too. I predict a close game.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
72. It's too late to forfeit the game.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 01:59 PM
Jan 2015

The only option is to heavily penalize the Patriots after the Superbowl. Loss of draft pics, fines and an indefinite suspension of Belichick. This is his second major cheating scandal and the NFL needs to come down hard on him.

Pathwalker

(6,598 posts)
73. Those balls don't account for the Colts lousy performance with
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:00 PM
Jan 2015

their own balls. Missed field goals, intercepted passes, blocked passes and all around lousy job - with their OWN balls - mean that the Patriots won that game.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
86. Actually they may.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:22 PM
Jan 2015

The whole point of the scandal is that softer balls are much easier to grip, and therefore throw and catch, in cold, wet weather.

Pathwalker

(6,598 posts)
91. The Colts had their own balls when they missed the field goals,
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:31 PM
Jan 2015

Luck threw the Colts balls which the Pats blocked by jumping and knocking them down. Plus, the Pats managed to catch those Colts balls. The wind also played it's part. I don't think a Pats balls made that one field goal kick by the Colts take a hard left turn in mid-air - the wind did that.

brendan120678

(2,490 posts)
146. Patriots still would have won, but that doesn't
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:58 PM
Jan 2015

mean that the allegations, if somehow proven true, should just be ignored. They should still be punished if they indeed cheated.

Pathwalker

(6,598 posts)
156. If proven true, they will be, according to NFL rules,
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jan 2015

and only NFL rules. Which, I predict, will please no one.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
97. Know as much about football as I know about golf and I don't even know which end you hold the caddy
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:39 PM
Jan 2015

Last edited Thu Jan 22, 2015, 07:39 AM - Edit history (1)

underpants

(182,773 posts)
100. No. That isn't a possible punishment and we have two "reports"
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 02:48 PM
Jan 2015

The NFL has not made any official statement.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
109. Does each side use only its own balls on offense?
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:23 PM
Jan 2015

Or did both teams play with the same deflated balls? If the latter, then I don't see the big advantage, although I do deplore cheating even if it doesn't work.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
120. The refs should be banned from post season games for a season.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 03:55 PM
Jan 2015

It's the refs job to catch this during play.

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
123. I don't like forfeit as a penalty
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jan 2015

The Colts played badly enough on both sides of the ball that whether the ball had enough air in it is a non-issue...Belichick could have sent Brady, the water boy, the towel boy, the bus driver, the medic and six cheerleaders out there and still scored on the Colts. If we were talking Tannehill vs Kaepernick and a one-TD victory then underinflated balls could be an issue...but with the level of beating the Colts took I don't think it is.

It could also be interesting to put a gauge on the Colts' balls. Since they all come from one factory, this would eliminate the weather theory...if the Colts were also playing with flat balls then either the weather was the culprit or both sides were cheating.

 

Nyc72dem

(63 posts)
126. Yeah let's check every ball every game
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:30 PM
Jan 2015

I'm sure COUNTLESS "deflated" balls have been used un-noticed.

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
141. Either that, or get away from this ironclad rule
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:50 PM
Jan 2015

Aaron Rodgers says he likes an overinflated ball. If there was no pressure rule he'd probably put 25 psi in it.

I downloaded the NFL rulebook,,,it reads like an army regulation. And some of that shit is pretty extreme, like the numbering regulation.

brendan120678

(2,490 posts)
130. Not forfeit, but I suppose the league should...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:37 PM
Jan 2015

fine the team (again), dock them a few years worth of first-round draft picks, and - best of all - ban Belichick from the game for a few years.

Johonny

(20,834 posts)
136. The only time they've banned is for gambling and... when someone got caught doing exactly what the
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:43 PM
Jan 2015

league told them not to do. This would be Belicheats second offense and God knows what else he does, but they aren't related. I doubt we even see a fine. I expect a rule change for 2016 and that's all.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
131. Nah.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:40 PM
Jan 2015

If it were a close game, the case could be made for a replay but that was a complete stomping of the Colts on both sides of the ball. The Pats would have won anyway but maybe only by two touchdowns or 17 points. That was an ass-whupping any way you look at it.

gopiscrap

(23,756 posts)
135. But it's still cheating if true
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:42 PM
Jan 2015

who's to say they won't cheat again in a close game...to me, there's gotta be some sanctions

Johonny

(20,834 posts)
134. Now you might see a rule change where the refs control game balls up to kick off...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jan 2015

The NFL simply doesn't forfeit games. If anything happens and doubt anything will; it will be a small fine for the owner. Unless the NFL turns up something more... then I doubt you'll even see a suspension.

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
137. I do think this is a serious problem
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:44 PM
Jan 2015

I wonder if there will be a Congressional hearing. If the claims are true, they in effect tried to fix the game, and that is tampering with matters of popular national trade at a high level.

 

LeftOfWest

(482 posts)
147. Pats haven't won a super bowl since spygate.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:03 PM
Jan 2015

Good question gopiscrap (and they are crap for sure, sorry to threadjack).


I am not sure what the answer is either.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
157. At least their alleged crime isn't criminal, like a certain coach who paid his players to injure
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 05:33 PM
Jan 2015

opposing teams players. He should have gone to jail.

Response to gopiscrap (Original post)

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
169. I don't really have an opinion
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 06:05 PM
Jan 2015

on what should be done, but I think it's pretty despicable to cheat, especially when they won by so much.

liberalhistorian

(20,816 posts)
184. Definitely, unquestionably YES.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 09:15 PM
Jan 2015

Especially since this is not BeliCHEAT's first go-round with serious cheating and the half-million-dollar fines and draft sanctions from that time obviously didn't work. At that time, BeliCHEAT should have been fired and blackballed from ever coaching in the NFL again.

I am enough of a realist, however, to know that that simply will not happen, in no small part due to Goodell being a simpering chickenshit who could not withstand the ensuing shitstorm.

Generic Brad

(14,274 posts)
186. They should be allowed to only use deflated balls
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 11:05 PM
Jan 2015

If they want soft balls - let's go all out and let Brady throw a totally limp ball. That should be karmic justice.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
191. Preposterous suggestion
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 11:36 AM
Jan 2015

If there is to be any punishment imposed, it will be in the form of the coach being suspended for a game or two next season.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
192. Whoever voted "yes" is crazy
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:43 PM
Jan 2015

The punishment should be 100k and a 4th round draft pick. This is so minor in the scheme of things.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the Patriots be ma...