Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAgain with the 'inexperienced' line?
Again with the 'inexperienced' line?
By Steve Benen
Four years ago, it made sense that Republicans would target Barack Obama as an inexperienced presidential candidate. He'd only held elected office for 12 years, and he was running against a GOP nominee who'd been in Congress for a quarter-century, so it stood to reason that Obama's critics would characterize the youthful candidate as unprepared for national office.
In 2012, however, this line of attack is pretty incoherent, but as Benjy Sarlin reported, Republicans are giving it a try anyway.
Quite right. President Obama, like him or not, has been leading the nation during a time of crisis, cleaning up a series of disasters left by his Republican predecessor, and serving as the Commander in Chief during a time of war. "Inexperienced" isn't an adjective that comes to mind.
But we can go a step further with this and ask a related question: do Mitt Romney's backers really want to talk about the candidates and their experience in public service?
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/27/11429193-again-with-the-inexperienced-line
By Steve Benen
Four years ago, it made sense that Republicans would target Barack Obama as an inexperienced presidential candidate. He'd only held elected office for 12 years, and he was running against a GOP nominee who'd been in Congress for a quarter-century, so it stood to reason that Obama's critics would characterize the youthful candidate as unprepared for national office.
In 2012, however, this line of attack is pretty incoherent, but as Benjy Sarlin reported, Republicans are giving it a try anyway.
The RNC ... launched an effort to brand Obama as unprepared for office on Thursday. In another throwback to the 2008 election, they used an old clip of Vice President Joe Biden, then a primary rival to Obama, questioning whether he was ready for the White House, and juxtaposed it with a video montage of lousy economic reports. Timing it to coincide with Biden's speech touting the president's record on foreign policy, the RNC paired it with an accompanying Twitter campaign using the hashtag "#StillNotReady." [...]
Warn voters that a freshman senator is dangerously inexperienced is one thing. Running against an incumbent president with a few military campaigns to his name and Osama bin Laden in the ocean, is another. After all, there's no one running more experienced at being president than the president himself.
Warn voters that a freshman senator is dangerously inexperienced is one thing. Running against an incumbent president with a few military campaigns to his name and Osama bin Laden in the ocean, is another. After all, there's no one running more experienced at being president than the president himself.
Quite right. President Obama, like him or not, has been leading the nation during a time of crisis, cleaning up a series of disasters left by his Republican predecessor, and serving as the Commander in Chief during a time of war. "Inexperienced" isn't an adjective that comes to mind.
But we can go a step further with this and ask a related question: do Mitt Romney's backers really want to talk about the candidates and their experience in public service?
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/27/11429193-again-with-the-inexperienced-line
Mitt would rather the "one term" not be mentioned: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002609835
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1694 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Again with the 'inexperienced' line? (Original Post)
ProSense
Apr 2012
OP
sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)1. Romney has no experience in the federal government at all.
louis-t
(23,269 posts)2. Well, at least they're not calling Obama a 'career politician'
yet....
DCKit
(18,541 posts)3. Just wait until RMoney trots out "I'll run the government like a business."
We'll have a field day going over his record as one of the most predatory vulture capitalists in history.
Retrograde
(10,129 posts)8. Sure, he can consolidate some of the states, sell off the money-losing areas
maybe acquire a few new ones like the Cayman Islands or the Bahamas. Will the military have to justify their ROIs? Will he fire the Democratic representatives if they don't go along with him?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)9. Yes, bankrupt the
Government and sell it off.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)4. No one except diehards is gonna buy this.
Three word response from the entire Obama team: HE'S THE PRESIDENT.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)5. If military service counts as experience, what about working as a community organizer?
zbdent
(35,392 posts)6. Obama doesn't have nearly the experience Rmoney has ...
I mean, how many businesses did Rmoney and Bain bankrupt after they took their profits? That's like saying "Hey, I hit a grand slam home run!" and forgetting that the other 999 times you were at bat, you struck out looking at the ball ...
struggle4progress
(118,233 posts)7. So Romney's the most inexperienced presidential candidate since W?