Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:08 AM May 2012

SEALs slam Obama for using them in bid to take credit for bin Laden killing during election

Serving and former US Navy SEALs have slammed President Barack Obama for taking the credit for killing Osama bin Laden and accused him of using Special Forces operators as ‘ammunition’ for his re-election campaign...

Ryan Zinke, a former Commander in the US Navy who spent 23 years as a SEAL and led a SEAL Team 6 assault unit, said: ‘The decision was a no brainer. I applaud him for making it but I would not overly pat myself on the back for making the right call.

‘I think every president would have done the same. He is justified in saying it was his decision but the preparation, the sacrifice - it was a broader team effort.’ ...

(Arianna Huffington) told CBS: ‘We should celebrate the fact that they did such a great job. It's one thing to have an NBC special from the Situation Room... all that to me is perfectly legitimate, but to turn it into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.’



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137636/SEALs-slam-Obama-using-ammunition-bid-credit-bin-Laden-killing-election-campaign.html

Now Obama isn't supposed to acknowledge his successes?
90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SEALs slam Obama for using them in bid to take credit for bin Laden killing during election (Original Post) Common Sense Party May 2012 OP
Thank you for your service, Mr. Zinke. randome May 2012 #1
The article says Zinke is a rethug state politician. GoCubsGo May 2012 #7
I didn't catch that but I can still thank him for having served. randome May 2012 #10
Oh, those rolling eye weren't aimed at you. GoCubsGo May 2012 #22
I knew that! randome May 2012 #28
well, that explains this arsehole newspeak May 2012 #47
I believe that the President gives them all the credit for the action. He give himself credit for nanabugg May 2012 #52
I'm guessing we would have heard crickets from Zinke if sadbear May 2012 #2
He would have been the first one to lead the parade of SEALs zbdent May 2012 #42
Don't worry, the outrage from our side would drown out the crickets hughee99 May 2012 #46
When was the last time the outrage from our side drowned out anything? sadbear May 2012 #54
Sandra Fluke. hughee99 May 2012 #65
Considering the source, military marlakay May 2012 #3
Wrong but led seal team six that be a Navy Captain nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #75
Obama is never supposed to acknowledge his successes Renew Deal May 2012 #4
It's "Swiftboating 2012". GoCubsGo May 2012 #5
100% correct n/t malaise May 2012 #15
Yup. Expect a book from Jerome Corsi and Regnery Press anytime now...nt SidDithers May 2012 #35
Agree completely. kiranon May 2012 #69
What a prick. Greybnk48 May 2012 #6
"The decision was a no-brainer"--seems to be the preprogrammed RNC talking point. TwilightGardener May 2012 #8
"I don't really think about him very much" - - GW Bush annabanana May 2012 #39
According to a congressman I heard Saturday LiberalFighter May 2012 #44
Interesting, did not know that about the mission's chances of success. TwilightGardener May 2012 #79
this was predictable. cali May 2012 #9
Yep. Attack his strengths. Hassin Bin Sober May 2012 #30
Is there one name of a SERVING SEAL? leftynyc May 2012 #11
He certainly gave the seals credit for their success. julian09 May 2012 #24
They "quote" one in the article--anonymously. Common Sense Party May 2012 #27
Not if most people making the call had their way. ieoeja May 2012 #51
Until that person comes forward, leftynyc May 2012 #62
This is going to backfire. n/t BumRushDaShow May 2012 #12
Zinke so why didn't Bushco send troops to Tora Bora Fresh_Start May 2012 #13
This is the Daily Mail. Their audience is Britsh wingnuts. n/t EFerrari May 2012 #14
Not to mention they don't have a stellar reputation for being truthful. vaberella May 2012 #48
Now, if Obama had landed a fighter jet on an aircraft carrier deutsey May 2012 #16
The mission accomplished was julian09 May 2012 #34
Wonder if Zinke would protest Plucketeer May 2012 #17
I would hope some other SEALs will speak up and denounce these comments. DCBob May 2012 #18
Why didn't Mr. Zinke & his Seal team capture & killl OBL? mulsh May 2012 #19
Another teabagger shows his true colors madokie May 2012 #20
this sounds like BS, any currently serving SEAL wouldn't say shit quinnox May 2012 #21
A more accurate headline: One Republican EX-Seal, now retired and running for office, slams Obama nt riderinthestorm May 2012 #23
Key point: running for *higher office* in Montana. Robb May 2012 #32
Perhaps those vaunted SEALs need to be reminded that Skidmore May 2012 #25
I'm no fan of the President but that article was a particularly poisonous... Poll_Blind May 2012 #26
Why, that's the stupidest thing I've read all morning. Iggo May 2012 #29
Daily Mail. 'nuff said...nt SidDithers May 2012 #31
Not Just About Making the Final Decision erpowers May 2012 #33
Consider the source. Mass May 2012 #36
Romney would've taken Gates' advice and bombed the compound. Obama went AGAINST the jenmito May 2012 #37
Anti-Obama drivel from dailymail and Arianna Huffington? I'm shocked! FSogol May 2012 #38
They're nothing if not consistent. nt Common Sense Party May 2012 #40
There are two people in particular, bluestate10 May 2012 #57
'but to turn it into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.’ ScreamingMeemie May 2012 #41
I sure hope this Zinke character is a genuine SEAL with documentation to back that up, bullwinkle428 May 2012 #43
Given that he is a republican. bluestate10 May 2012 #59
Commander Zinke is a real deal SEAL... Aviation Pro May 2012 #60
I'll admit to using a little bit of "performance art", by employing "birtherism" bullwinkle428 May 2012 #70
Then I will question the fact that he led Seal Team 6 nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #76
He was probably a squadron commander.... Aviation Pro May 2012 #78
Yeah but as I said way too much inside baseball nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #86
Bush “I truly am not that concerned about him.” Him referring to bin Laden MagickMuffin May 2012 #45
Didn't Bush take credit for overthrowing (and later capturing) Saddam Hussein? Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #49
It was a no-brainer to try to kill or capture OBL, given the intelligence that was available. Vattel May 2012 #50
I don't understand this. Obama has done nothing BUT assert that it was a team effort Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #53
+1,000,000, Sir!! nt nanabugg May 2012 #55
I'm very much a girl, but thank you! ;) Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #63
Of course. sadbear May 2012 #58
What's to not understand? GoCubsGo May 2012 #67
That what a figure of speech, but yes, you are 100% correct! :) Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #72
"Mr Zinke, who is now a Republican state senator in Montana ..." AtomicKitten May 2012 #56
I think that should be SEAL since only one, who wasn't a part of the raid, is complaining LynneSin May 2012 #61
What's really rich may day 2012 May 2012 #64
Me fink you freaky and I like you a lot. Iggo May 2012 #68
This piece is hysterical on so many fronts Capt. Obvious May 2012 #66
What's that? You are a bitter shitstain Rex May 2012 #71
NO! Obama put his presidency ON THE LINE with that decision. Bake May 2012 #73
He took credit for approving the mission. only a fool would believe that he was saying he did a jwirr May 2012 #74
He is lying. Say anything and get everyone to believe it. mfcorey1 May 2012 #77
I have never heard Obama speak without giving credit to the Navy Seals... kentuck May 2012 #80
Sorry, I just don't believe this LASlibinSC May 2012 #81
It's just more FUD. Major Hogwash May 2012 #82
how does one guy who is now a REpublican running for office and Arianna Huffington make "SEALs" ? JI7 May 2012 #83
Every president DIDN'T do the same. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #84
Zinke is currently a RW politician and that is left out of the article...convenient. n/t Sheepshank May 2012 #85
it's mentioned, in passing... spanone May 2012 #89
As long as they are retired nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #87
what horseshit..... spanone May 2012 #88
Was he on the team that took down Bin Laden? varelse May 2012 #90

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
47. well, that explains this arsehole
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:12 PM
May 2012

If any president would do it, then why didn't little boots pursue it? Maybe, just maybe, OBL was quite the political tool for little boots. I remember, as well as, you should remember arse when little boots publicly stated he wasn't concerned with OBL. I mean after all, he already got what he wanted and keeping OBL out there, especially during the 2004 elections seemed to be very useful for the repugs. Nothing like having your alleged enemy basically endorsing Kerry, oh no, doesn't want the all powerful little boots back in office. Maybe OBL knew little boots wouldn't pursue him, but kerry would have. Ever think of that, Zinke?

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
52. I believe that the President gives them all the credit for the action. He give himself credit for
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:34 PM
May 2012

decision to act. This is just an attempt to or a further attempt to have the forces disrespect their CIC. The ones who fall for this crap already don't like the fact the Obama is President...the military is full of them and they get support from FOX and friends in criticizing the President. A pox on their houses!

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
42. He would have been the first one to lead the parade of SEALs
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:28 AM
May 2012

to go to DC to shake Bush43's hand, making sure that Faux & all the other "liberally-biased media" had the cameras on, recording exactly why they were there.

Hey, Mr. Zinke ... we had a guy in the WH who had no brain, and he DIDN'T PULL THE TRIGGER ...

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
46. Don't worry, the outrage from our side would drown out the crickets
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:09 PM
May 2012

if this had happened under *.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
75. Wrong but led seal team six that be a Navy Captain
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:29 PM
May 2012

an O-6, that is where they start to trend R in the officer ranks.

There have been plenty of studies on this and I know it contradicts world views, but lower ranks in both officer and enlisted tend to be more Democratic, while higher ranks trend Republican.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
8. "The decision was a no-brainer"--seems to be the preprogrammed RNC talking point.
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:17 AM
May 2012

I would argue that the operation could have gone very wrong, and the SEALS' blood would have been on Obama's hands. He could have ordered them into a death trap.

LiberalFighter

(50,790 posts)
44. According to a congressman I heard Saturday
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:41 AM
May 2012

It was not a no brainer! The CIA's assessment had dropped from 60% success rate to 40% just before Obama made his decision but he had not received that last assessment. I think actually that 60% drop to 40% was whether Osama bin laden was at that location.

If I recall one of the factors that probably increased the success rate was Obama increasing operation support from the original plan. If he hadn't ordered additional support for the operation it could had very had failed.

Obama was getting mostly negative feedback for the operation. So if it was a no brainer then why so many within the administration's team against it?

You are so right that it could had gone wrong. They didn't know what type of consequences there might be going into an ally's territory without their permission. An ally that for all intents and purpose been harboring bin Laden. They didn't know 100% what there might be waiting for them.

I hope that worthless Seal candidate for office has his butt handed to him in his election.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,315 posts)
30. Yep. Attack his strengths.
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:52 AM
May 2012

Karl Rove 101.

Have a war hero ruining against a draft dodger? Attack the war hero's record. It works.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
11. Is there one name of a SERVING SEAL?
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:18 AM
May 2012

As this hatchet job claims in the very first sentence posted. Or just ones trying to make hay using their past glory? Both he and Arianna can go fuck themselves.

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
24. He certainly gave the seals credit for their success.
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:47 AM
May 2012

They would never have had the chance under Romney, because he wouldn't pursue Osama in Pakistan. He stated as much in a 07 debate. He plays everything too safe and both ways, to be decisive, he would have probably taken the bomb route and destroyed a lot of intelligence at the site and the certainty of the fact the US got Bin Ladin.
One of the first things he did when taking office, he instructed his defense chief and cia director to
give the elimination of Osama top priority.
Obama deserves the right to point out that he accomplished his goal of getting Osama, because he made it a priority. Romney or Bush made it a back burner issue, you will not hit the target if you aim in an other direction. Ask the seals who were greeted at the white house, if they were not rewarded for their heroic actions.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
27. They "quote" one in the article--anonymously.
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:50 AM
May 2012

A serving SEAL Team member said: ‘Obama wasn’t in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because he speechwriters are smart.
‘But the more he tries to take the credit for it, the more the ground operators are saying, “Come on, man!” It really didn’t matter who was president. At the end of the day, they were going to go.’


Of course, that could be pure fiction.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
51. Not if most people making the call had their way.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:29 PM
May 2012

Biden, Clinton, the Joint Chiefs were pretty much all in favor of using a drone or cruise missile. Obama made the call to send in the SEALs so they would have 100% verification.

So, no, at the end of the day they were not "going to go" had Obama not sent them. And, of course, they would have had one hell of a time returning had Obama not overruled the military's original plan to not send extra helicopters.


 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
62. Until that person comes forward,
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:55 PM
May 2012

it is fiction - nothing pure about it. No professional SEAL would talk to the press about anything.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
13. Zinke so why didn't Bushco send troops to Tora Bora
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:18 AM
May 2012

while the injured Osama was there and the local commander was asking for troops?
Could have saved ourselves 8+ years looking for him if we had got him in 2002?

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
48. Not to mention they don't have a stellar reputation for being truthful.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:13 PM
May 2012

Heavy embellishment is their jive.

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
34. The mission accomplished was
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:54 AM
May 2012

Bush not crash landing on the carrier. McCain the hero, sprouting brainwashed Gop propaganda.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
17. Wonder if Zinke would protest
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:21 AM
May 2012

if Obama accepted responsibility had the raid gone askew??? Maybe Zinke didn't get a big enough medal.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
19. Why didn't Mr. Zinke & his Seal team capture & killl OBL?
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:23 AM
May 2012

I usually avoid reading the crap the Daily Mail spews & the above person quoted is a good example of why.

Another cowardly "conservative" at work. the people of Montana must feel fortunate to have someone like him in their Senate. I know we Californians are thankful there are relatively few like him in our Senate

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
21. this sounds like BS, any currently serving SEAL wouldn't say shit
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:24 AM
May 2012

for one thing, because there is a military ethical formal code where they can't take sides in politics or malign the commander in chief. They could be kicked out of the military for violating it.

So maybe one former SEAL republican who is now in politics is saying this, but I don't believe there is a group of them.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
32. Key point: running for *higher office* in Montana.
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:53 AM
May 2012
http://ryanzinkeformontana.com/

He and Livingstone were down 33 points to the front-runners in this race back in February. Maybe they think this will help.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
25. Perhaps those vaunted SEALs need to be reminded that
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:47 AM
May 2012

they have a CiC. Did they question the great Texas asshole for the way they were misused in the wars he lied us into as well as the fact that he CALLED OFF the hunt for OBL to hunt oil in Iraq?

And Huffington can bite me.

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
26. I'm no fan of the President but that article was a particularly poisonous...
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:48 AM
May 2012

...piece of garbage.

Geeze.

I have no idea how many people here will actually go to the link and read the full article, as I have, but that thing is an amazing construct of...well, bullshit.

And it looks like most of that bullshit is coming from these (ex) SEALS.

Admiral William McRaven "made the call" as opposed to the President, as former SEAL Chris Kyle alleges?

Bullshit. Bullshit. Bulllllll-shit.

There are quite a few things tucked away in the article like that, that are just bullshit.

And I think anyone who is reasonably aware of the situation in Pakistan would find it hard to believe that "any President" would have made the same call. That's bullshit, too. In fact, it's funny because the single biggest gamble in the Obama presidency was to carry out that raid. Remember, Pakistan had no idea we were there. They could have shot down our aircraft, killed our troops. Did I mention Pakistan has nuclear weapons? I mean, come on. If that raid had gone bad it would have been EPIC bad.

There's no president who's just going to reflexively say "Oh, yeah, go for it. Use the bat copters."

Not in that situation.

PB

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
33. Not Just About Making the Final Decision
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:54 AM
May 2012

I think many of the people who are saying "any president would have done the same thing" in regard to giving the Seal Team the go ahead to invade Bin Laden's compound. It is not just a matter of whether anyone would have given the final order; it is a matter if anyone, specifically Mitt Romney would have supported and pushed the effort to find Bin Laden. Romney is quoted as saying that he would not have made a big effort to find Bin Laden. That is the real point.

jenmito

(37,326 posts)
37. Romney would've taken Gates' advice and bombed the compound. Obama went AGAINST the
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:56 AM
May 2012

advice of the majority of his advisors. They thought it was too risky to send in Seal Team 6. Obama made the decision that was high risk, high reward. Romney doesn't have the spine to take that route.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
57. There are two people in particular,
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:39 PM
May 2012

who post nothing but anti-Obama and anti-democrat drivel right here on DU. Yet they claim they are progressives. What do they expect? That Romney and a republican Congress would govern the way they want government to work? A famous PT Barnum phrase comes to mind when I think of those two.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
41. 'but to turn it into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.’
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:07 AM
May 2012

Yes, Obama should follow Bush's example. I mean we wouldn't have caught Bush and the Pubbies using 9/11 for political gain.

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
43. I sure hope this Zinke character is a genuine SEAL with documentation to back that up,
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:32 AM
May 2012

given the number of phony-ass clowns out there claiming to be former SEALS who weren't any part of them at all.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
59. Given that he is a republican.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:41 PM
May 2012

His Seal claims may be another lying fascade that party is becoming known for.

Aviation Pro

(12,129 posts)
60. Commander Zinke is a real deal SEAL...
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:43 PM
May 2012

...here's his official Navy photograph.



He is free to say what he wants and as wrong as it may be his service to the country cannot not be impeached.

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
70. I'll admit to using a little bit of "performance art", by employing "birtherism"
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:13 PM
May 2012

against the very type of people that really have yet to stop questioning Barack Obama's legitimacy as President.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
76. Then I will question the fact that he led Seal Team 6
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:32 PM
May 2012

that be a CAPTAIN, not a COMMANDER.

He might have served as Executive Officer of the unit though, or XO.

He might have led them in the FIELD as well as an operational officer, but led... that implies in command... that is an O-6 billet, not O-5

I know, I know way too much inside baseball.

That said, thank you for putting ass on line Commander...

Aviation Pro

(12,129 posts)
78. He was probably a squadron commander....
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:17 PM
May 2012

....remembering that SEAL teams are broken down into platoons.

That being said, I've exhausted my knowledge of the Teams and there are plenty of military sites that can answer these questions.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
86. Yeah but as I said way too much inside baseball
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:23 PM
May 2012

led, to most civies without any knowledge of this, is the whole team.

That is my objection to this... "led Team Six" language.

MagickMuffin

(15,933 posts)
45. Bush “I truly am not that concerned about him.” Him referring to bin Laden
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:48 AM
May 2012

Perhaps Zinke needs a refresher course in which President was willing to do what it took to "get" bin Laden. It certainly wasn't Bush!

So, no Zinke you are wrong. every president was not interested in doing the same.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,396 posts)
49. Didn't Bush take credit for overthrowing (and later capturing) Saddam Hussein?
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:16 PM
May 2012

There was also something about a flight suit, aircraft carrier, and "mission accomplished" banner too..................

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
50. It was a no-brainer to try to kill or capture OBL, given the intelligence that was available.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:27 PM
May 2012

It was NOT a no-brainer to send the Navy seals in instead of bombing the compound. Obama risked his presidency by going against the advice of Gates and the Pentagon and sending the seals in. By doing so, he SAVED CIVILIAN LIVES, got confirmation of OBL's death, and enabled intelligence gathering in the compound. If the operation had failed, with seals dying, he would have become an object of ridicule with no chance at winning a second term. It was a brave decision and I highly doubt that McCain or Romney would have made it.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
53. I don't understand this. Obama has done nothing BUT assert that it was a team effort
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:34 PM
May 2012

and that he just gave the order. He absolutely DID give all the credit to the Navy Seals. In fact, he has been far TOO humble!!!

If it were George "Dumbya" Bush, we would be reminded each and every day with banners and parades and "News Alerts" crawls on all news stations.

I don't care what anyone says. This has every bit to do with race and how no matter what this man does, he will NEVER be good enough as a black man!!

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
58. Of course.
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:39 PM
May 2012

This is how republicans are framing it. President Obama hasn't said half the stuff republicans give him credit for.

GoCubsGo

(32,075 posts)
67. What's to not understand?
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:07 PM
May 2012

Taking one's strengths and accomplishments, and turning them into faults using lies, distortions, and smears is one of the GOP's favorite tactics for smearing their opponents. Just ask John Kerry and Al Gore.

 

may day 2012

(8 posts)
64. What's really rich
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:01 PM
May 2012

is it NEVER HAPPENED. Bin Laden was dead long ago (or in Tahiti sipping a Mai Tai). The situation room pic is a fucking joke.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
66. This piece is hysterical on so many fronts
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:07 PM
May 2012

but this one may be my favorite: "Arianna Huffington, an outspoken liberal who runs the left-leaning Huffington Post website, roundly condemned it."

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
71. What's that? You are a bitter shitstain
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:15 PM
May 2012

that voted for GWB and feel embaressed that your CoC was a major fuckup? Fuck off, but thank you for your service...if that is even true.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
73. NO! Obama put his presidency ON THE LINE with that decision.
Tue May 1, 2012, 01:26 PM
May 2012

It was risky. The odds of gettin gbin Laden were 50-50 or worse. Had the mission failed, Obama would have been a lame duck and his presidency effectively OVER.

His decision took major-league, big-time cojones!

So screw you, Mr. Seal. Thank you for USING YOUR SERVICE for political gain, you ass-wipe.

Bake

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
74. He took credit for approving the mission. only a fool would believe that he was saying he did a
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:26 PM
May 2012

hands-on rescue himself. FDR announced the beginning of WWII but he did not say he was going to fight in the war. Only another spin from the rethugs.

kentuck

(111,053 posts)
80. I have never heard Obama speak without giving credit to the Navy Seals...
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:50 PM
May 2012

What is this guy talking about? Is he being paid by the GOP??

It was not a "no brainer". With all due respect, he is lying his ass off.

LASlibinSC

(269 posts)
81. Sorry, I just don't believe this
Tue May 1, 2012, 04:43 PM
May 2012

Color me naive, stupid whatever. I don't know a lot about military culture or Special Forces mentality. I have been around men all my life 4 older brothers. This did not sound like any man I know. Isn't there plenty of serving or ex-military at DU that can speak to this ? Dems serve too! I still reject this story, it doesn't ring true.

JI7

(89,241 posts)
83. how does one guy who is now a REpublican running for office and Arianna Huffington make "SEALs" ?
Tue May 1, 2012, 04:47 PM
May 2012

they quote one guy. and the other person is Arianna Huffington and refer to it as SEALs criticizing OBama ?

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
84. Every president DIDN'T do the same.
Tue May 1, 2012, 04:51 PM
May 2012

Bush didn't.

Romney wouldn't have had to make that decision, because he's on record saying he wouldn't spend the money to find bin Laden, i.e., develop the actionable intelligence necessary for the decision.

Obama made it a priority and then made the call.

spanone

(135,795 posts)
89. it's mentioned, in passing...
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:56 PM
May 2012

Mr Zinke, who is now a Republican state senator in Montana, added that MR Obama was exploiting bin Laden’s death for his re-election bid. ‘The President and his administration are positioning him as a war president using the SEALs as ammunition. It was predictable.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137636/Osama-bin-Laden-death-SEALs-slam-Obama-using-ammunition-bid-credit.html#ixzz1tg3OCK7U

varelse

(4,062 posts)
90. Was he on the team that took down Bin Laden?
Wed May 2, 2012, 08:46 AM
May 2012

Then I guess he has a right to express his opinion. Ms Huffington, on the other hand, isn't worth the air she used to pronounce her judgement on this matter (IMO).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SEALs slam Obama for usin...