General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSEALs slam Obama for using them in bid to take credit for bin Laden killing during election
Ryan Zinke, a former Commander in the US Navy who spent 23 years as a SEAL and led a SEAL Team 6 assault unit, said: The decision was a no brainer. I applaud him for making it but I would not overly pat myself on the back for making the right call.
I think every president would have done the same. He is justified in saying it was his decision but the preparation, the sacrifice - it was a broader team effort. ...
(Arianna Huffington) told CBS: We should celebrate the fact that they did such a great job. It's one thing to have an NBC special from the Situation Room... all that to me is perfectly legitimate, but to turn it into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137636/SEALs-slam-Obama-using-ammunition-bid-credit-bin-Laden-killing-election-campaign.html
Now Obama isn't supposed to acknowledge his successes?
randome
(34,845 posts)You're an asshole.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)And he's still an asshole.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)They were for Zimke, the now-political hack.
randome
(34,845 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)If any president would do it, then why didn't little boots pursue it? Maybe, just maybe, OBL was quite the political tool for little boots. I remember, as well as, you should remember arse when little boots publicly stated he wasn't concerned with OBL. I mean after all, he already got what he wanted and keeping OBL out there, especially during the 2004 elections seemed to be very useful for the repugs. Nothing like having your alleged enemy basically endorsing Kerry, oh no, doesn't want the all powerful little boots back in office. Maybe OBL knew little boots wouldn't pursue him, but kerry would have. Ever think of that, Zinke?
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)decision to act. This is just an attempt to or a further attempt to have the forces disrespect their CIC. The ones who fall for this crap already don't like the fact the Obama is President...the military is full of them and they get support from FOX and friends in criticizing the President. A pox on their houses!
sadbear
(4,340 posts)this had happened under bush.
zbdent
(35,392 posts)to go to DC to shake Bush43's hand, making sure that Faux & all the other "liberally-biased media" had the cameras on, recording exactly why they were there.
Hey, Mr. Zinke ... we had a guy in the WH who had no brain, and he DIDN'T PULL THE TRIGGER ...
hughee99
(16,113 posts)if this had happened under *.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)marlakay
(11,431 posts)no surprise there as most is republican...
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)an O-6, that is where they start to trend R in the officer ranks.
There have been plenty of studies on this and I know it contradicts world views, but lower ranks in both officer and enlisted tend to be more Democratic, while higher ranks trend Republican.
Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)It doesn't fit the narrative.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)Same shit, different assholes.
malaise
(268,717 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
kiranon
(1,727 posts)Greybnk48
(10,162 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)I would argue that the operation could have gone very wrong, and the SEALS' blood would have been on Obama's hands. He could have ordered them into a death trap.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)THAT'S the no-brain in this discussion...
LiberalFighter
(50,790 posts)It was not a no brainer! The CIA's assessment had dropped from 60% success rate to 40% just before Obama made his decision but he had not received that last assessment. I think actually that 60% drop to 40% was whether Osama bin laden was at that location.
If I recall one of the factors that probably increased the success rate was Obama increasing operation support from the original plan. If he hadn't ordered additional support for the operation it could had very had failed.
Obama was getting mostly negative feedback for the operation. So if it was a no brainer then why so many within the administration's team against it?
You are so right that it could had gone wrong. They didn't know what type of consequences there might be going into an ally's territory without their permission. An ally that for all intents and purpose been harboring bin Laden. They didn't know 100% what there might be waiting for them.
I hope that worthless Seal candidate for office has his butt handed to him in his election.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)Karl Rove 101.
Have a war hero ruining against a draft dodger? Attack the war hero's record. It works.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)As this hatchet job claims in the very first sentence posted. Or just ones trying to make hay using their past glory? Both he and Arianna can go fuck themselves.
julian09
(1,435 posts)They would never have had the chance under Romney, because he wouldn't pursue Osama in Pakistan. He stated as much in a 07 debate. He plays everything too safe and both ways, to be decisive, he would have probably taken the bomb route and destroyed a lot of intelligence at the site and the certainty of the fact the US got Bin Ladin.
One of the first things he did when taking office, he instructed his defense chief and cia director to
give the elimination of Osama top priority.
Obama deserves the right to point out that he accomplished his goal of getting Osama, because he made it a priority. Romney or Bush made it a back burner issue, you will not hit the target if you aim in an other direction. Ask the seals who were greeted at the white house, if they were not rewarded for their heroic actions.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)A serving SEAL Team member said: Obama wasnt in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because he speechwriters are smart.
But the more he tries to take the credit for it, the more the ground operators are saying, Come on, man! It really didnt matter who was president. At the end of the day, they were going to go.
Of course, that could be pure fiction.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Biden, Clinton, the Joint Chiefs were pretty much all in favor of using a drone or cruise missile. Obama made the call to send in the SEALs so they would have 100% verification.
So, no, at the end of the day they were not "going to go" had Obama not sent them. And, of course, they would have had one hell of a time returning had Obama not overruled the military's original plan to not send extra helicopters.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)it is fiction - nothing pure about it. No professional SEAL would talk to the press about anything.
BumRushDaShow
(128,521 posts)Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)while the injured Osama was there and the local commander was asking for troops?
Could have saved ourselves 8+ years looking for him if we had got him in 2002?
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)vaberella
(24,634 posts)Heavy embellishment is their jive.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)that would've been just fine.
julian09
(1,435 posts)Bush not crash landing on the carrier. McCain the hero, sprouting brainwashed Gop propaganda.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)if Obama accepted responsibility had the raid gone askew??? Maybe Zinke didn't get a big enough medal.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I suspect they will.
mulsh
(2,959 posts)I usually avoid reading the crap the Daily Mail spews & the above person quoted is a good example of why.
Another cowardly "conservative" at work. the people of Montana must feel fortunate to have someone like him in their Senate. I know we Californians are thankful there are relatively few like him in our Senate
madokie
(51,076 posts)is all this is.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)for one thing, because there is a military ethical formal code where they can't take sides in politics or malign the commander in chief. They could be kicked out of the military for violating it.
So maybe one former SEAL republican who is now in politics is saying this, but I don't believe there is a group of them.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)He and Livingstone were down 33 points to the front-runners in this race back in February. Maybe they think this will help.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)they have a CiC. Did they question the great Texas asshole for the way they were misused in the wars he lied us into as well as the fact that he CALLED OFF the hunt for OBL to hunt oil in Iraq?
And Huffington can bite me.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)...piece of garbage.
Geeze.
I have no idea how many people here will actually go to the link and read the full article, as I have, but that thing is an amazing construct of...well, bullshit.
And it looks like most of that bullshit is coming from these (ex) SEALS.
Admiral William McRaven "made the call" as opposed to the President, as former SEAL Chris Kyle alleges?
Bullshit. Bullshit. Bulllllll-shit.
There are quite a few things tucked away in the article like that, that are just bullshit.
And I think anyone who is reasonably aware of the situation in Pakistan would find it hard to believe that "any President" would have made the same call. That's bullshit, too. In fact, it's funny because the single biggest gamble in the Obama presidency was to carry out that raid. Remember, Pakistan had no idea we were there. They could have shot down our aircraft, killed our troops. Did I mention Pakistan has nuclear weapons? I mean, come on. If that raid had gone bad it would have been EPIC bad.
There's no president who's just going to reflexively say "Oh, yeah, go for it. Use the bat copters."
Not in that situation.
PB
Iggo
(47,535 posts)People voted for this guy?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I think many of the people who are saying "any president would have done the same thing" in regard to giving the Seal Team the go ahead to invade Bin Laden's compound. It is not just a matter of whether anyone would have given the final order; it is a matter if anyone, specifically Mitt Romney would have supported and pushed the effort to find Bin Laden. Romney is quoted as saying that he would not have made a big effort to find Bin Laden. That is the real point.
Mass
(27,315 posts)jenmito
(37,326 posts)advice of the majority of his advisors. They thought it was too risky to send in Seal Team 6. Obama made the decision that was high risk, high reward. Romney doesn't have the spine to take that route.
FSogol
(45,452 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)who post nothing but anti-Obama and anti-democrat drivel right here on DU. Yet they claim they are progressives. What do they expect? That Romney and a republican Congress would govern the way they want government to work? A famous PT Barnum phrase comes to mind when I think of those two.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Yes, Obama should follow Bush's example. I mean we wouldn't have caught Bush and the Pubbies using 9/11 for political gain.
bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)given the number of phony-ass clowns out there claiming to be former SEALS who weren't any part of them at all.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)His Seal claims may be another lying fascade that party is becoming known for.
Aviation Pro
(12,129 posts)...here's his official Navy photograph.
He is free to say what he wants and as wrong as it may be his service to the country cannot not be impeached.
bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)against the very type of people that really have yet to stop questioning Barack Obama's legitimacy as President.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that be a CAPTAIN, not a COMMANDER.
He might have served as Executive Officer of the unit though, or XO.
He might have led them in the FIELD as well as an operational officer, but led... that implies in command... that is an O-6 billet, not O-5
I know, I know way too much inside baseball.
That said, thank you for putting ass on line Commander...
Aviation Pro
(12,129 posts)....remembering that SEAL teams are broken down into platoons.
That being said, I've exhausted my knowledge of the Teams and there are plenty of military sites that can answer these questions.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)led, to most civies without any knowledge of this, is the whole team.
That is my objection to this... "led Team Six" language.
MagickMuffin
(15,933 posts)Perhaps Zinke needs a refresher course in which President was willing to do what it took to "get" bin Laden. It certainly wasn't Bush!
So, no Zinke you are wrong. every president was not interested in doing the same.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,396 posts)There was also something about a flight suit, aircraft carrier, and "mission accomplished" banner too..................
Vattel
(9,289 posts)It was NOT a no-brainer to send the Navy seals in instead of bombing the compound. Obama risked his presidency by going against the advice of Gates and the Pentagon and sending the seals in. By doing so, he SAVED CIVILIAN LIVES, got confirmation of OBL's death, and enabled intelligence gathering in the compound. If the operation had failed, with seals dying, he would have become an object of ridicule with no chance at winning a second term. It was a brave decision and I highly doubt that McCain or Romney would have made it.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)and that he just gave the order. He absolutely DID give all the credit to the Navy Seals. In fact, he has been far TOO humble!!!
If it were George "Dumbya" Bush, we would be reminded each and every day with banners and parades and "News Alerts" crawls on all news stations.
I don't care what anyone says. This has every bit to do with race and how no matter what this man does, he will NEVER be good enough as a black man!!
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)sadbear
(4,340 posts)This is how republicans are framing it. President Obama hasn't said half the stuff republicans give him credit for.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)Taking one's strengths and accomplishments, and turning them into faults using lies, distortions, and smears is one of the GOP's favorite tactics for smearing their opponents. Just ask John Kerry and Al Gore.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Nuff said.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)just saying
may day 2012
(8 posts)is it NEVER HAPPENED. Bin Laden was dead long ago (or in Tahiti sipping a Mai Tai). The situation room pic is a fucking joke.
Iggo
(47,535 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)but this one may be my favorite: "Arianna Huffington, an outspoken liberal who runs the left-leaning Huffington Post website, roundly condemned it."
Rex
(65,616 posts)that voted for GWB and feel embaressed that your CoC was a major fuckup? Fuck off, but thank you for your service...if that is even true.
Bake
(21,977 posts)It was risky. The odds of gettin gbin Laden were 50-50 or worse. Had the mission failed, Obama would have been a lame duck and his presidency effectively OVER.
His decision took major-league, big-time cojones!
So screw you, Mr. Seal. Thank you for USING YOUR SERVICE for political gain, you ass-wipe.
Bake
jwirr
(39,215 posts)hands-on rescue himself. FDR announced the beginning of WWII but he did not say he was going to fight in the war. Only another spin from the rethugs.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)kentuck
(111,053 posts)What is this guy talking about? Is he being paid by the GOP??
It was not a "no brainer". With all due respect, he is lying his ass off.
LASlibinSC
(269 posts)Color me naive, stupid whatever. I don't know a lot about military culture or Special Forces mentality. I have been around men all my life 4 older brothers. This did not sound like any man I know. Isn't there plenty of serving or ex-military at DU that can speak to this ? Dems serve too! I still reject this story, it doesn't ring true.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)It's horsehockey intended to spread FUD.
Fear
Uncertainty
Doubt
JI7
(89,241 posts)they quote one guy. and the other person is Arianna Huffington and refer to it as SEALs criticizing OBama ?
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Bush didn't.
Romney wouldn't have had to make that decision, because he's on record saying he wouldn't spend the money to find bin Laden, i.e., develop the actionable intelligence necessary for the decision.
Obama made it a priority and then made the call.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)Mr Zinke, who is now a Republican state senator in Montana, added that MR Obama was exploiting bin Ladens death for his re-election bid. The President and his administration are positioning him as a war president using the SEALs as ammunition. It was predictable.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137636/Osama-bin-Laden-death-SEALs-slam-Obama-using-ammunition-bid-credit.html#ixzz1tg3OCK7U
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)have at it boys
spanone
(135,795 posts)varelse
(4,062 posts)Then I guess he has a right to express his opinion. Ms Huffington, on the other hand, isn't worth the air she used to pronounce her judgement on this matter (IMO).