Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJack Shafer, Reuters OpEd: "Rupert Murdoch’s escape act"
Rupert Murdochs escape act
http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2012/05/01/rupert-murdochs-escape-act/
The publication today of Parliaments 121-page report (pdf) on phone hacking has the British press all but publishing obituaries for Rupert Murdoch. The report damns him for turning a blind eye to the scandal of phone hacking at his companies, News Corporation and New International.
Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company, the report concludes, leveling a hammer to the media barons head. As the Telegraph interprets this finding, BSkyB, the UK satellite broadcaster that Murdoch owns 39.1 percent of, is vulnerable to a challenge from the regulators at Ofcom. If the regulators applied their fit and proper test to BSkyB, they could cancel its broadcasting license, order News Corp. to reduce its holdings in the broadcaster and oust Ruperts son James Murdoch from its board of directors. The BBC seconded the Telegraphs take, and the Telegraph and the Guardian speculate that the report will echo in the United States, triggering criminal prosecutions and unending damage to Murdochs corporate reputation here.
Murdochs corporate counterattack today states that News Corp. has already confronted and acted on the failings documented in the Report, insisting that the company has righted all the wrongs. In a memo to his 50,000 employees, Murdoch remained defiant, minimizing corporate wrongdoing and maximizing the corrective measures his company has taken.
Even more bad news for Murdoch will arrive when the Leveson Inquiry concludes its investigation and issues recommendation for future press regulation.
http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2012/05/01/rupert-murdochs-escape-act/
The publication today of Parliaments 121-page report (pdf) on phone hacking has the British press all but publishing obituaries for Rupert Murdoch. The report damns him for turning a blind eye to the scandal of phone hacking at his companies, News Corporation and New International.
Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company, the report concludes, leveling a hammer to the media barons head. As the Telegraph interprets this finding, BSkyB, the UK satellite broadcaster that Murdoch owns 39.1 percent of, is vulnerable to a challenge from the regulators at Ofcom. If the regulators applied their fit and proper test to BSkyB, they could cancel its broadcasting license, order News Corp. to reduce its holdings in the broadcaster and oust Ruperts son James Murdoch from its board of directors. The BBC seconded the Telegraphs take, and the Telegraph and the Guardian speculate that the report will echo in the United States, triggering criminal prosecutions and unending damage to Murdochs corporate reputation here.
Murdochs corporate counterattack today states that News Corp. has already confronted and acted on the failings documented in the Report, insisting that the company has righted all the wrongs. In a memo to his 50,000 employees, Murdoch remained defiant, minimizing corporate wrongdoing and maximizing the corrective measures his company has taken.
Even more bad news for Murdoch will arrive when the Leveson Inquiry concludes its investigation and issues recommendation for future press regulation.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 894 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Shafer, Reuters OpEd: "Rupert Murdoch’s escape act" (Original Post)
Amerigo Vespucci
May 2012
OP
DCKit
(18,541 posts)1. "We're no longer acting illegally (yeah, right), so there's no basis for legal action."
Sorry Rupert, that's not how it works.
malaise
(268,846 posts)2. Best line
The BBC seconded the Telegraphs take, and the Telegraph and the Guardian speculate that the report will echo in the United States, triggering criminal prosecutions and unending damage to Murdochs corporate reputation here.