Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 11:50 AM Mar 2015

The Hard Left simply doesn't realize how damned difficult it is

to carry two cell phones.

Let's get real for a moment: because the Hard Left doesn't know enough to do pragmatic favors for Jamie, Lloyd, and the other shrewd businessmen who love their country, they're usually broke and could never afford two cell phones.

Well, as a person who can afford two cell phones, let me tell you: carrying two cell phones is damned difficult work. (No, having your assistant carry them doesn't make it any easier, nice try.)

So, Moonbats, until you've walked a mile in another woman's (beautifully-crafted!) shoes, stop being Republicans. Just pipe down and let the pros handle this.

Regards,

Third-Way Manny

129 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Hard Left simply doesn't realize how damned difficult it is (Original Post) MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 OP
Oh Lord Manny! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #1
Manny is a Lord? BeanMusical Mar 2015 #16
Lol, no. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #19
He's been demoted! Lol! sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #21
Psst, is it safe to say something positive about Hillary here? shhh..dont tell anybody I am here NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #77
Ok my friend. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #83
Sometimes I find it amazing the cul-de-sacs Skidmore Mar 2015 #2
You know what cul-de-sac actually means, right? msanthrope Mar 2015 #15
It's French for Turd Way. BeanMusical Mar 2015 #18
I know exactly what I said. Skidmore Mar 2015 #23
Good for you. msanthrope Mar 2015 #26
Shouldn't these post be signed The Real Manny? boston bean Mar 2015 #3
No. nt MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #4
So these posts you are making are boston bean Mar 2015 #72
Yup...nt SidDithers Mar 2015 #25
You are famous or infamous here at DU, not sure which, but clue me in, are you a NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #78
He's Skinner. joshcryer Mar 2015 #115
you Better Believe It. nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #30
Yes. zappaman Mar 2015 #31
Or perhaps signed by ... Straw-Manny. JoePhilly Mar 2015 #43
Trey Gowdy Manny. nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #44
Third-Leg Manny n/t Jeff Rosenzweig Mar 2015 #59
Who paid her phone bills? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #5
God knows I hope we find out and we ignore silly things like potential nuclear war with Russia or NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #80
I don't know about you... brooklynite Mar 2015 #87
Maybe along the way she just tossed some change into aspirant Mar 2015 #129
uh huh uh huh 99Forever Mar 2015 #6
Quit complaining and do something! treestar Mar 2015 #7
... BrotherIvan Mar 2015 #9
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #13
That would require him to actually leave his keyboard./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #24
And for instance work to get people to the polls etc. Yeah, it isnt easy work but someone has to do NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #82
Do you have one of those peep holes in your computer that can see into the homes of other DUers sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #88
Well, it's not really a peep hole.. snooper2 Mar 2015 #124
Our friend would probably hector them to vote over the internet./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #89
Every DU OP that attacks Hillary helps force Warren to run. JoePhilly Mar 2015 #45
Hehe treestar Mar 2015 #60
I'm betting ... JoePhilly Mar 2015 #62
Who did pay for Hillary's e-mail and phone accounts? JDPriestly Mar 2015 #66
Still on about the email thing? Y'all must really be hurting for a new scandal. DanTex Mar 2015 #8
Au contraire, MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #10
One more Manny pscot Mar 2015 #106
FOX News is the only station running it. joshcryer Mar 2015 #117
Nothing new to discuss, Manny? MineralMan Mar 2015 #11
Who needs the extra baggage when you travel a lot. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #81
Speaking of weak sauce it's not about a duck... not even a duck Autumn Mar 2015 #86
You have a problem with ducks? MineralMan Mar 2015 #102
I like roast duck. Autumn Mar 2015 #104
So do I, along with crispy wok-fried duck. MineralMan Mar 2015 #105
Do your ducks aspirant Mar 2015 #109
There are just two, a mated pair. MineralMan Mar 2015 #119
Can you tell if they really like you aspirant Mar 2015 #120
They're wild birds. It's not a matter of like or not like. MineralMan Mar 2015 #121
Do wild life have feelings too? aspirant Mar 2015 #125
This thread is not about ducks. If you'd like to talk about ducks, MineralMan Mar 2015 #126
Would your posts aspirant Mar 2015 #127
Personal and business. OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #12
+100 ND-Dem Mar 2015 #64
The attack-the-messenger crowd won't touch this. OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #74
If you read that in Wikileaks, you are liable for prosecution. Octafish Mar 2015 #107
If Al Qaeda read it, that would make me an associate. OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #110
....x10 840high Mar 2015 #111
That was quite concise! Right to the heart of the matter. morningfog Mar 2015 #112
The connection is an absurd conspiracy. joshcryer Mar 2015 #118
2 email accounts on the same phone. how hard is that? Travis_0004 Mar 2015 #14
I will say this TexasProgresive Mar 2015 #17
Two checking accounts? Jim Beard Mar 2015 #54
You better hope you never get audited. I farm too riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #122
When did being "hard" become a bad thing anyway? bemildred Mar 2015 #20
This OP is pretending that those echoing the GOP talking points on Clinton geek tragedy Mar 2015 #29
The OP is engaging in sarcasm or parody or something like that. bemildred Mar 2015 #92
yes, the idea being that it's third way types who refuse to join the Trey Gowdy crowd geek tragedy Mar 2015 #93
Well, if it helps, I think the email scandal is horseshit. bemildred Mar 2015 #96
I agree. If people want something secret, they'll meet in person, go through geek tragedy Mar 2015 #97
I don't even have one cellphone. :( daredtowork Mar 2015 #22
Benghazi! geek tragedy Mar 2015 #27
I wish Liz and Bernie would post an OP here about who they will vote for...you think that NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #84
This is what happens...now the mess is spreading to her Assistant??? HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #28
I could be way off, but something tells me merrily Mar 2015 #32
The authentic progressive who never voted for Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Bush Pere speaks: DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #33
I'm sure the Trey Gowdy 'progressives' will excommunicate Bernie geek tragedy Mar 2015 #36
Yep Andy823 Mar 2015 #40
Her relationship with her server was private and consensual. Plus everyone else does it. Now, whereisjustice Mar 2015 #34
It's not anyone on the left driving this story. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #35
PLUS ONE./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #37
Because clearly we don't expect either Party to behave in an ethical manner. It's just so old whereisjustice Mar 2015 #41
Blah blah blah Hillary is Satan blah blah blah. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #42
The most pusillanimous thing to do on a liberal or conservative bulletin board is to stake out... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #47
Whoa - you think Hillary is Satan? Maybe her one device talks to the dark lord whereisjustice Mar 2015 #67
Manny, are there any Republicans for whom you carry the same ... 11 Bravo Mar 2015 #38
That is not fair and completely inaccurate. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #39
All of 'em MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #48
+ Ed Suspicious Mar 2015 #56
Except you wish Obama hadn't won. zappaman Mar 2015 #63
I did write that once in 30,000 posts MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #70
yes, you'd rather McCain won because you post alot... zappaman Mar 2015 #73
+100 ND-Dem Mar 2015 #69
Just say'n, "Hard Left" sounds like a Vermont Apple Cider HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #46
Hard Left? Dems are afraid to even mention stopping war without getting in a plane crash. Octafish Mar 2015 #49
Just stop, Manny. democrank Mar 2015 #50
pimping the stupid ass email crap has absolutely nothing to do with supporting unions. nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #52
We just need to go ahead and accept that this is going to be the ongoing practice Fumesucker Mar 2015 #51
Do you really think Clinton would have sent hyper-sensitive, damaging emails geek tragedy Mar 2015 #55
You missed my OP the other day? Fumesucker Mar 2015 #58
Politically, it was a very cautious, cowardly vote. geek tragedy Mar 2015 #61
That's not terribly comforting when we are thinking about the next POTUS Fumesucker Mar 2015 #68
there's no flattering interpretation of that vote geek tragedy Mar 2015 #71
Just a promotion. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #76
I'm glad you're seeking common ground with people like Trey Gowdy, showing that bipartisan geek tragedy Mar 2015 #85
Yes, that's what I'm doing. By the way, MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #90
The only people pushing the Clinton email story are Republicans and Republican-friendly geek tragedy Mar 2015 #91
Hooray! I'm a Republican! MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #94
yay for transparency! nt geek tragedy Mar 2015 #95
Will you support Hillary if she is the nominee? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #98
I haven't answered this for you before? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #100
No I don't think you have answered that before but I could be wrong. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #101
LOL! Who would vote third party? I mean realistically, for the presidential race? Rex Mar 2015 #108
Will you support Hillary if she is the nominee? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #53
Yes, by all means let the sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #57
You're getting pretty good at the 'two minutes of hate' threads! Rex Mar 2015 #65
*Pretty* good? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #75
I see a few of the usual suspects missing. Rex Mar 2015 #99
Yesterday's scandal... TerrapinFlyer Mar 2015 #79
I'm on the Left, and I'm Hard when I wake up in the morning ... Martin Eden Mar 2015 #103
Um...Okay...? Stellar Mar 2015 #114
Lame Shtick JI7 Mar 2015 #113
Inconveniences are not necessarily difficult. joshcryer Mar 2015 #116
Childish uponit7771 Mar 2015 #123
How about if I glue those 2 phones together so I just have one! RKP5637 Mar 2015 #128

boston bean

(36,217 posts)
72. So these posts you are making are
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:31 PM
Mar 2015

Satiring people who don't want Hillary to run and want Elizabeth warren to run instead?

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
78. You are famous or infamous here at DU, not sure which, but clue me in, are you a
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:02 PM
Mar 2015

administrator here or something?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. Who paid her phone bills?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 12:20 PM
Mar 2015

I'd imagine with all that traffic it must have been pretty high? And, how did they work out which calls were "personal" and which "business"?

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
80. God knows I hope we find out and we ignore silly things like potential nuclear war with Russia or
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:03 PM
Mar 2015

Iran.

Homelessness, etc.


Those emails and Benghazi are so important...

treestar

(82,383 posts)
7. Quit complaining and do something!
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 12:32 PM
Mar 2015

Quit demanding other people do things according to your way and not theirs! Do your own thing!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
88. Do you have one of those peep holes in your computer that can see into the homes of other DUers
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:19 PM
Mar 2015

so you know what they do with their other than the time they spend here? There are a few people here who, like you, seem to be able to follow DUers around somehow?

Or is that just one of those old and long outdated, attempts to try to discredit other people you actually know nothing about? That's why it became outdated, btw.

How would YOU know what Manny or anyone else does with their time?

By your logic, that's all you do also, no?

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
124. Well, it's not really a peep hole..
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:27 AM
Mar 2015

and your kitchen window is cracked about an inch open....just FYI

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
45. Every DU OP that attacks Hillary helps force Warren to run.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:30 PM
Mar 2015

Or at least that seems to be the theory at work here.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
66. Who did pay for Hillary's e-mail and phone accounts?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:10 PM
Mar 2015

Do you know? I never thought of that until this moment.

Did Hillary get the costs reimbursed from an expense account?

Did she pay the bills herself out of her salary and other income?

Or did Goldman Sachs or some third party pay them?

Same for Jeb Bush.

Who paid for the e-mail account that he did not turn in until after the law required?

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
117. FOX News is the only station running it.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 12:20 AM
Mar 2015

Oh, well, I guess and the punditry at the Sunday talk shows.

But we can root for the Republicans to subpoena her databases, no?

Autumn

(44,958 posts)
86. Speaking of weak sauce it's not about a duck... not even a duck
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:14 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:39 PM - Edit history (1)

with plum sauce but...oh, well...

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
105. So do I, along with crispy wok-fried duck.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:50 PM
Mar 2015

I also really like watching that pair of mallards who have come to my yard for eleven years. I don't see that as a conflict in any way. Perhaps I have a broader view of things. But thanks for mentioning my duck thread.

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
119. There are just two, a mated pair.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 09:30 AM
Mar 2015

So, it's hard to tell if they're in a row. Usually, one eats while the other watches.

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
121. They're wild birds. It's not a matter of like or not like.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:22 AM
Mar 2015

They recognize us as the creatures who put food out for them. More than that, I can't say.

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
126. This thread is not about ducks. If you'd like to talk about ducks,
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:33 AM
Mar 2015

this thread is the one where I mentioned the pair of ducks that returns to my yard each year:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026367284

I won't respond in this thread any further on that subject. Hijacking threads is not a great thing to do.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
127. Would your posts
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:42 AM
Mar 2015

#102 and #105 (eating ducks) be considered hijacking too?

Would you eat your pair of ducks?

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
12. Personal and business.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 01:23 PM
Mar 2015

When you're using USAID to put pressure on the Haitian government to keep slave wages for the benefit of the big money donors to your own foundation, who decides what emails are personal and business?

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
74. The attack-the-messenger crowd won't touch this.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 04:27 PM
Mar 2015
Stop hating Hillary! You're helping Republicans!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
107. If you read that in Wikileaks, you are liable for prosecution.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 09:28 PM
Mar 2015

Hence the brouhaha and resulting secret courts.

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
110. If Al Qaeda read it, that would make me an associate.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 09:53 PM
Mar 2015

Since due process does not mean judicial process, I can expect to be put on the Terror Tuesday kill list for drone assassination.

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
118. The connection is an absurd conspiracy.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 12:36 AM
Mar 2015

USAID made a study, the factory owners successfully bribe their minimum wage exemption into existence, and USAID gets blamed for "bolstering" the factory owners.

TexasProgresive

(12,153 posts)
17. I will say this
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 01:48 PM
Mar 2015

My company Z-10 Blackberry which they had to pry out of my hands when I retired had a personal and a work space. My emails from the company came on the secure work space. Had I so wanted I could've had personal email on the personal space.

But I really don't care that much about Ms. Clinton's emails as long as they have been released. This is really a non-issue to me because whatever goes in an email is likely not very secure no matter who owns the server. When I was in the Air Force we were warned not to discuss sensitive material much less secret and top secret over the telephone and today people talk, Skype, Facebook, twitter et all everything. My grandson was putting stuff on Facebook when he was serving in Afghanistan. A friend of my who served in Iraq said that the soldiers were constantly letting family and friends know where they were and what they were doing.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
54. Two checking accounts?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:48 PM
Mar 2015

I farm and I co-mingle my farm accounts and personal banking accounts. It isn't a big operation so it is easier to just carry one check book.

Oh and for those who will jump up and say "Use a credit or debit card". Sorry not all of the people I trade with are set up to take credit cards and bill paying is bet done by check.

There are times when it is best to do separate but equal.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
122. You better hope you never get audited. I farm too
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 10:22 AM
Mar 2015

Ive been.audited 3x. I also have a horse training and boarding operation which is a bigger target but I will tell you co-mingling personal and business funds is a bad idea...

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
20. When did being "hard" become a bad thing anyway?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 01:51 PM
Mar 2015

I mean what's this "hard left" bullshit, are we supposed to be wimps or something, reasonable? Like the conservatives are reasonable?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
29. This OP is pretending that those echoing the GOP talking points on Clinton
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:11 PM
Mar 2015

are somehow more left wing and dedicated to progressive principles than people like Bernie Sanders are.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
92. The OP is engaging in sarcasm or parody or something like that.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:10 PM
Mar 2015

And the term "hard left" is supposed to be used by third-wayers to describe us "progressives". Or that was how I read it.

Edit: I was getting at the fact that the Clinton's pride themselves on being hard nosed and cold-blooded, so calling us hard is sort of a compliment.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
93. yes, the idea being that it's third way types who refuse to join the Trey Gowdy crowd
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:13 PM
Mar 2015

in treating Clinton's email stuff as the crime of the century, because "true progressives" will always line up against the she-Devil known as Hillary Clinton whereas it's the evil beltway sellouts who are refusing to chime in their abject horror at hillary clinton using one email address for all of her correspondence.



bemildred

(90,061 posts)
96. Well, if it helps, I think the email scandal is horseshit.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:18 PM
Mar 2015

But then I think the idea of secure email is horseshit. If you want it secure, write a real letter, put it in an envelope and seal it, and mail it first class. That won't work either, but you will make them go to a lot more trouble to read it.

The web is a public place, all of it. People need to stop treating it like it was their livingroom or a private space, it's not.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
97. I agree. If people want something secret, they'll meet in person, go through
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:21 PM
Mar 2015

intermediaries to keep their fingerprints off it, or just use the telephone.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
22. I don't even have one cellphone. :(
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:02 PM
Mar 2015

In California you can't get lifeline on both a landline and a cellphone, and my housemate insists on the landline.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
27. Benghazi!
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:10 PM
Mar 2015

Is this Trey Gowdy Manny?

It's Republicans and their allies, not the left, that care about this shit.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
84. I wish Liz and Bernie would post an OP here about who they will vote for...you think that
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:07 PM
Mar 2015

would stop the rightwing talking points?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
32. I could be way off, but something tells me
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:14 PM
Mar 2015

you might be only pretending to love Third Way.

I'm going to keep my eye on you. My third eye, too.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
33. The authentic progressive who never voted for Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Bush Pere speaks:
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:15 PM
Mar 2015
"Why am I asked about Hillary Clinton every other day, about her emails?” he asks. “Do you know what — I can’t swear to you on this — last I checked, here in Washington, do you know how many calls I got from Vermont on Hillary Clinton’s emails? Zero. Yet I can’t walk down the hallways here without hearing about Hillary Clinton’s emails

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
40. Yep
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:24 PM
Mar 2015

Seems like those emails only bother the right wingers, and the anti everything group here on DU. Seems like of they should be taking examples from Bernie, and stop the stupidity and get to discussing real issues. or better yet promoting the "candidate" that they think fits their way of thinking the best.

As for me I am still waiting to find out how is and who isn't running since we really don't know right now.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
34. Her relationship with her server was private and consensual. Plus everyone else does it. Now,
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:15 PM
Mar 2015

look what the loony left has done, they've forced Hillary to drag her dead mother into it as a defense.

Respecting women. Yeah, sure. You go girl.



 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
35. It's not anyone on the left driving this story.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:17 PM
Mar 2015

Don't think partisan Democrats have failed to notice who has joined forces with John Boehner over this.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
41. Because clearly we don't expect either Party to behave in an ethical manner. It's just so old
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:25 PM
Mar 2015

fashioned. Like the Bill of Rights.

Hillary planted the seeds of this mess. Her handling thus far has only made things worse.

So fuck me if I demand that the the golden girl Democrats are demanding for President have at least a shred of ethical conviction and think farther than her own self-interests.

Once again a Clinton has stepped out of bounds and the Democratic Party is forced to spin and twist a bunch of bullshit that the even the most political detached American can tell is pure bullshit.

She stepped in it and now she's trying to clean her shoe by rubbing it all over the place.

This is the problem with 3rd way putting all their eggs in Clintons basket.

Her fuck ups are likely to set us back another decade.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
42. Blah blah blah Hillary is Satan blah blah blah.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:28 PM
Mar 2015

Your personal hatred for the woman is not make you any more progressive or moral than those who care about shit that actually matters.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
47. The most pusillanimous thing to do on a liberal or conservative bulletin board is to stake out...
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:33 PM
Mar 2015

The most pusillanimous thing to do on a liberal or conservative bulletin board is to stake out the most liberal or conservative position as possible.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
67. Whoa - you think Hillary is Satan? Maybe her one device talks to the dark lord
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:12 PM
Mar 2015

himself and that's who told her to run state dept. business on a computer system in her basement.

Oh look, I think she has a call coming in now...

(Hail to the Chief Ring Tone)

"Hello, Rahm? Larry Summers says fuck the non-rich. What would Goldman say?"

11 Bravo

(23,922 posts)
38. Manny, are there any Republicans for whom you carry the same ...
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:19 PM
Mar 2015

level of contempt and disdain in which you hold one of the more prominent members of the Democratic party?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
39. That is not fair and completely inaccurate.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:21 PM
Mar 2015

There are at least two prominent Democrats whom he holds in much greater contempt than he does any Republican. You forgot about the President.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
48. All of 'em
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:40 PM
Mar 2015

Tell me, why did Lincoln scold and fire his losing generals? After all, it was the Confederacy that was the problem, right?

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
63. Except you wish Obama hadn't won.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:04 PM
Mar 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x761367

If you could reverse ONE election outcome, which would it be?

Of all the presidential elections since Watergate, if you could go back and reverse the outcome of just ONE of them (knowing that would have changed history and subsequent elections most likely would have featured different candidates debating very different issues, which election would you change and why?

1976: Carter d. Ford
1980: Reagan d. Carter
1984: Reagan d. Mondale
1988: Bush d. Dukakis
1992: Clinton d. Bush
1996: Clinton d. Dole
2000: Bush d(?). Gore
2004: Bush d. Kerry
2008: Obama d. McCain



MannyGoldstein

16. 2008.
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 08:18 PM by MannyGoldstein
In the prior elections, people got what they wanted, whether it was good or bad, perhaps with the exception of the stolen 2004 election (which was close, anyway). So, no matter who won, things would have generally gone the way they did. For example, Al Gore was an active participant in Clinton's development of the outsourced-torture "extraordinary rendition" program.

In 2008, people voted overwhelmingly for hope and change, but we got much other, for examples:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/resp...

This is an enormous problem. We've had almost 20% real unemployment for years, and more shoveling of worker's cash to the wealthiest. So now the Democratic brand is badly damaged, and the people have returned even-crazier Republicans to office in a desperate attempt for actual, helpful change. It's like the poor souls who leaped from the Twin Towers on 9/11 to avoid the fire. Awful, awful choices.

Would McCain's policies be much different? I don't see how. In addition, at least we'd have a chance for bringing in people with Democratic ideals in 2010 and 2012 - 2010 was a disaster, and 2012 is unlikely to see a good outcome at the Presidential level.



 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
70. I did write that once in 30,000 posts
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:15 PM
Mar 2015

Sometimes I still feel that way.

Certainly, Obama's (lack of?) efforts have done tremendous damage to the belief of Americans that we can have real change: witness how young Americans are staying away from the ballot box since Obama came to office.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
49. Hard Left? Dems are afraid to even mention stopping war without getting in a plane crash.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:40 PM
Mar 2015

Shoot, let alone mentioning any accountability for starting illegal, immoral, unnecessary and disastrous ones for profit.

democrank

(11,082 posts)
50. Just stop, Manny.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:41 PM
Mar 2015

You just want a Republican to win, but let me tell you....those people, those Hard Left people....believe in unicorns and unions. We simply can`t have that.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
51. We just need to go ahead and accept that this is going to be the ongoing practice
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:45 PM
Mar 2015

For both Republicans and Democrats, neither side will hold their own side to account for slippery practices and so have no standing to even complain about the other side.

Might as well bury transparency at the crossroads at midnight with a stake through its heart, it's dead Jim.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
55. Do you really think Clinton would have sent hyper-sensitive, damaging emails
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:49 PM
Mar 2015

via a state.gov account had she had one, or that she would have (a) sent them using her private account anyways or (b) picked up the phone like people normally do when they don't want a paper trail?

This is not some 28-year old testosterone-fueled investment banker firing off stuff from a blackberry. This is one of the more cautious politicians in the modern era who knows better than anyone that any paper trail will be picked up. If she were really hiding something, we wouldn't know about it.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
58. You missed my OP the other day?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 02:56 PM
Mar 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026362441



And you're going to have to convince me that Hillary's IWR vote was cast out of an abundance of caution.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
61. Politically, it was a very cautious, cowardly vote.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:01 PM
Mar 2015

Remember that in 2004 the conventional wisdom was that those who opposed Operation Desert Storm had revealed themselves to be pro-Saddam cowards who were afraid to let American military supremacy transform the planet into a paradise of freedom.

And ex post 9/11, one certainly didn't want to be painted as that lest one lose their Very Serious card. No other potential rivals for leadership of the party were raising their opposition to it--Kerry, Edwards, Biden, Dodd--every single Senate Democrat who wound up running in either 2004 or 2008 voted for the damn thing, because they didn't perceive any political downside to it. Because, who would call them on it--Dennis Kucinich?

As for the mistake, Clinton's mindset is probably very much: "they are going to have a fit about some stupid bullshit no matter what I do."

Had she just used a state.gov email address, and even one email had gone to the spam box or had failed to be saved, we'd be hearing about how Clinton's state department was scrubbing her emails of anything incriminating, with comparisons to Nixon erasing his tapes, etc.

Process driven stories like this tend to be about the unknowable and people's imaginations.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
71. there's no flattering interpretation of that vote
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:16 PM
Mar 2015

maybe the best is that she would claim she was suffering from 911itis.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
85. I'm glad you're seeking common ground with people like Trey Gowdy, showing that bipartisan
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:10 PM
Mar 2015

cooperation is still possible, provided there is a common enemy.

Who says our political system is broken?

Too bad Bernie Sanders isn't your kind of Third Way.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
90. Yes, that's what I'm doing. By the way,
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:28 PM
Mar 2015

are you OK with NSA spying? So's Louis Gohmert!

Congratulations, Louis-Gohmert enabler!

(Or maybe you just love sophomoric arguments. Even worse, maybe you believe them, eew.)

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
91. The only people pushing the Clinton email story are Republicans and Republican-friendly
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:33 PM
Mar 2015

media hacks.

And, also, I'm not 'okay' with NSA spying on Americans.

Whining about Clinton's email server etc is substance-free hack stuff, not something genuine progressives who care about the issues tend to do.

But maybe there's something that you, Trey Gowdy, Fox News, and John Boehner know that Bernie Sanders, Martin O'Malley and Elizabeth Warren don't know.

But then, when one posts exclusively with the intent to attack Democrats, without attacking Republicans or pushing actual ideas, conclusions will be drawn.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
101. No I don't think you have answered that before but I could be wrong.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:02 PM
Mar 2015

I pledge to support the nominee. I could never vote third party.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
108. LOL! Who would vote third party? I mean realistically, for the presidential race?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 09:33 PM
Mar 2015

I'm all for freedom of choice and if someone wants to waste a vote for a party that cannot ever win in a 100 years...

OTOH, I guess it still beats not voting or voting republican imo.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
65. You're getting pretty good at the 'two minutes of hate' threads!
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:05 PM
Mar 2015

Two phones Manny!? TWO!? Rabblerabblerabblerabble!
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
99. I see a few of the usual suspects missing.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 06:34 PM
Mar 2015

However, after careful review - I'll give this thread a few more days so they can show up and 'rabblerabblerabblerabble' at you. I am a fair man.

Martin Eden

(12,838 posts)
103. I'm on the Left, and I'm Hard when I wake up in the morning ...
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:39 PM
Mar 2015

... so I guess this OP is about me, at least on an interim basis.

But there's something I don't understand. I have personal email and also work email, and I use them both with one smartphone. Am I the only one who has this technology?

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
114. Um...Okay...?
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 11:44 PM
Mar 2015
"But there's something I don't understand. I have personal email and also work email, and I use them both with one smartphone. Am I the only one who has this technology?"


MY grandson bought me a cellphone for Christmas (I wished he has saved his change, I'm not a big cellphone person). It will allow you to use two different 'numbers' at once. I don't have a work email anymore, I'm retired.


http://www.evine.com/offer/?offercode=451-483&track=-10102&ciid=11281

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
116. Inconveniences are not necessarily difficult.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 12:16 AM
Mar 2015

Perhaps "annoying" is the word you're looking for.

If you think it is "convenient" to have two devices, one for personal, one for government, that's fine.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Hard Left simply does...