General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAccidental moment of candor: Rahm Emanuel adviser reveals what is wrong with Democratic politics.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/us/chicago-mayors-race-is-cast-as-a-test-of-liberalism.htmlBy "crazy left" he means what was the "moderate left" 20 years ago. AKA people who have been "right" about just about everything ranging from the Iraq war to tax policy, trade policy and more.
It seems to me that this election is one battleground for the future of the Democratic party and Chuy has won something by just forcing a runoff.
Worth a read.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/us/chicago-mayors-race-is-cast-as-a-test-of-liberalism.html
merrily
(45,251 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)that Rahm's political operation is effectively a bribery machine
If you got to pay to play, there's no getting around that.
Also that is outrageously anti-democratic to the core. Plutocratic would be a good adjective, and I would not rule out the use of the term Fascist either.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Tries To Exempt Financial Firms From Ethics Laws
http://www.ibtimes.com/chicago-mayor-rahm-emanuel-tries-exempt-financial-firms-ethics-laws-1763018
The counterintuitive declaration came this week from the mayor-appointed ethics commission, responding to Chicago aldermens request for an investigation of campaign contributions to Emanuel from the financial industry. The request followed disclosures that executives at firms managing Chicago pension money have made more than $600,000 worth of donations to Emanuel. The contributions flowed to the mayor despite a city ordinance -- and an executive order by Emanuel himself -- restricting mayoral campaign contributions from city contractors.
http://www.ibtimes.com/chicago-mayor-rahm-emanuel-tries-exempt-financial-firms-ethics-laws-1763018
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)staff.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)...to most of those people who do have both. They got theirs, why should they give a crap about the rest of us?
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I for one have no plans to contribute to any candidate in the coming election. Not that I have a great deal to offer in cash, but I am done giving it to politicians.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)This guy will probably go far.
captainarizona
(363 posts)In arizona undocumented dreamers and american latinos under 18 went door to door trying to get latino voters out to defeat sheriff arpaio. The election authority tried to give latino citizens provisional ballots and tried to drive latinos out of line waiting to vote. Even with this vote suppression arpaio only got 50.7% of the vote. The young people without power or money can still get their relatives and neighbors to the polls. If they can't discourage you from voting they lose as a large turnout stops them. Young people should hold street demonstrations to get free media attention in support of change. Give people hope not despair.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Emanuel, a former political adviser to President Bill Clinton and White House chief of staff to President Obama, has signed up with Ready for Hillary and will host two Chicago fundraisers for the pro-Clinton superPAC on June 5.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/05/09/rahm-emanuel-jumps-on-the-hillary-clinton-bandwagon/
tularetom
(23,664 posts)My mom always said if you wanted to know if you could trust a politician, look at who their friends are. She was in many ways a bit of a libertarian wing nut, but over the years I've come to realize she was right on about this.
So when I see pictures of Hillary Clinton hugging Kissinger, read accounts of gazillion dollar speeches to Goldman Sachs, praising bush jr for "bipartisanship", and now rubbing elbows with Rahm Emanuel for a few mil, I'm starting to get a picture of what a Clinton administration might look like.
And it doesn't look very pretty.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Seriously.
delrem
(9,688 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)You knew exactly whose interests were going to be served.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)as a good thing
The aura of genius surrounding Rahm is supposed to glow gold, because he turned on Bill Clinton to the quintessential importance of money and that alone carried a minor Arkansas governor to victory. Well it is if you read bios of Emanuel, edited by Emanuel staff.
Belief in the political branding, and faithfulness to it, is a common feature of professional and amateur sycophants.
Like most myths, there is a hint of truth that lies within...there is no doubt among campaign managers that payments must be made for indebtedness incurred. That fact was nothing new in 1991 and it's been known by all whose age made them voting eligible for longer than now living memory.
Unfortunately despite it's appearance as a jeweled beauty, it's swung as a cudgel, and it is carried with the pride of a mace of regal authority.
The truth is the treasure hoards of Rahmwellian power represent not glorious gold rewards from a citizenry grateful for wise stewardship, but rather are mountains of the same old sort of brass and copper payola that have accumulated to debase politics throughout American history.
What is really different with this version of corruption?? Perhaps only that it was enshrined as a core belief in those controlling the national democratic playbook as The Golden Rule: Those with the Gold Rule.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)He was the longest-serving governor in Arkansas's history (actually, a record he shares with Orval Faubus, which can never be equalled now), the chairman of the Democratic Governor's Association, and the keynote speaker at the 1988 Democratic National Convention.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)and the state he governed, with due respect, wasn't at the center of nation policy debates or news during Clinton's governorship. So people outside Arkansas had quite little familiarity with the context and accomplishments of his governorship