Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEugene Robinson Why are we in Afghanistan for the long haul?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/leaving-yet-staying-in-afghanistan/2012/05/03/gIQADCB1zT_story.html?hpid=z2Show of hands: Does anybody really understand the U.S. policy in Afghanistan? Can anyone figure out how were supposed to stay the course and bring home the troops at the same time?
Im at a loss, even after President Obamas surprise trip to the war zone. The presidents televised address from Bagram air base raised more questions than it answered. Lets start with the big one: Why?
According to Obama, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al-Qaeda could never use this country to launch attacks against us. I would argue that U.S. and NATO forces have already done all that is humanly possible toward that end.
The Taliban government was deposed and routed. Al-Qaeda was first dislodged and then decimated, with over 20 of their top 30 leaders killed, according to the president. Osama bin Laden was tracked to his lair in Pakistan, shot dead and buried at sea. To the extent that al-Qaeda still poses a threat, it comes from affiliate organizations in places such as Yemen and from the spread of poisonous jihadist ideology. Al-Qaedas once-extensive training camps in Afghanistan have long been obliterated, and the groups presence in the country is minimal.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 2494 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eugene Robinson Why are we in Afghanistan for the long haul? (Original Post)
xchrom
May 2012
OP
malaise
(268,692 posts)1. He's right n/t
leveymg
(36,418 posts)2. There are still Roman garrisons all over the place.
Now, it's our turn to leave ruins behind.
Robb
(39,665 posts)5. That's in England.
Point made, but it's a little green for Afghanistan.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)11. Hadrian's Wall in Cornwall. As I said, all over the place. As for Afghanistan, a bit of
liberty taken. Greco-Roman. No question about Alexander and the Macedonians there. Left behind a lot of nice stonework and plunder in Afghanistan:
Recursion
(56,582 posts)12. And Greek ones in, of all places, Afghanistan (nt)
Logical
(22,457 posts)3. He is 100% correct! I am waiting for the defenders of Obama to reply!
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)10. Haven't we already been "in" Afghanistan since Prez. Carter?
Or is it just the black man that is held accountable?
Logical
(22,457 posts)14. Really?
frylock
(34,825 posts)15. there must be a godwin's equivalent to the race card
Scuba
(53,475 posts)4. How soon we forget...
KG
(28,751 posts)6. well, Mr Robinson, that the prez deems it so should be good enough you.
so stop with the negative priming. sheesh!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)7. Robinson's opinion
As Obama knows, however, polls indicate that Americans are weary of this war. He told the nation Tuesday night that 23,000 troops would be withdrawn by the end of the summer. This will reduce troop levels to about 65,000 still far above what Obama inherited in 2009. By the end of 2014, Obama said, the Afghans will be fully responsible for the security of their country. But how many Americans will remain? And, again, why?
At that point, Obama said, we will leave behind just enough personnel to support the Afghan government in counterterrorism operations and provide continued training for Afghan forces. At present, however, were in the midst of a counterinsurgency campaign of the kind that takes decades, at best, to succeed. If were going to switch to counterterrorism in a couple of years, why not just make the switch now?
At that point, Obama said, we will leave behind just enough personnel to support the Afghan government in counterterrorism operations and provide continued training for Afghan forces. At present, however, were in the midst of a counterinsurgency campaign of the kind that takes decades, at best, to succeed. If were going to switch to counterterrorism in a couple of years, why not just make the switch now?
...at least doesn't make up numbers and throw around hyperbole. In fact, he asks the right question, which advocates speeding up the process, getting out now instead of 2014.
Though the dynamics in Afghanistan are slightly different, the Iraq withdrawal (http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=637814) offers a model for how the administration will likely proceed.
Logical
(22,457 posts)16. So you think Obama is wrong on this issue???
marmar
(77,052 posts)8. Imperial misadventures will do us in sooner than later.
nt
xchrom
(108,903 posts)9. well not too soon i should hope -- we're just getting started in asia! nt
MadHound
(34,179 posts)13. Easy answer, we're there for the long haul
So we can keep the MIC well fed and cared for for years to come.