General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoney Maid Has A Message About Anti-Gay 'Religious Freedom' Laws
http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/look_honey_maid_has_a_message_for_indiana_and_arkansasHoney Maid a year ago in March released a beautiful video ad trumpeting their campaign called "This Is Wholesome." That of course sparked outrage from One Million Moms. So then Honey Maid did just about the best thing anyone has ever done with hate.
Now, in response to all the anti-gay "religious freedom" laws, like Indiana's, and the bill in Arkansas Governor Hutchinson is about to decide on, Honey Maid put out this simple but effective statement:
Well done!
CincyDem
(6,336 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)No Vested Interest
(5,164 posts)One or two before bedtime, with a little peanut butter.
That's wholesome.
AngryDem001
(684 posts)Soooo gooood!!
wryter2000
(46,023 posts)Will have to remember to buy some next time.
ashling
(25,771 posts)csziggy
(34,131 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)Rich and indulgent, this sweet confection is made with a buttery, old fashioned graham cracker crumb crust, and filled with an ethereally smooth lemon curd lightened with swirls of whipped cream. Glistening blueberries coated in a little sugar are arranged in a border on top
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Tanuki
(14,914 posts)can you post a link to the recipe?
Tanuki
(14,914 posts)and thank you!
[img][/img]
csziggy
(34,131 posts)Hold the blueberries, please.
Raster
(20,998 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,357 posts)If I had to guess, I'd say lemon custard with mint and blueberries in a graham cracker crust, but that can't be right, can it?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Sorry to be a cynic, but large multinationals rarely do the right thing simply because it's the right thing. On the contrary, they are often seeking to deflect bad publicity, such as poor labor policies or stinky crackers.
We all know what graham crackers are supposed to smell and taste like sweet and crunchy. But some people whove recently purchased Nabisco Honey Maid Graham Crackers are complaining about a strange smell and terrible taste.
Dozens of complaints from across the country are posted on ConsumerAffairs.com. People are also venting on Twitter using the hashtag #stinkycrackers
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)They have no choice. Corporations are required by law to maximize return to the shareholders. By law, they can do only what will increase return or is neutral. They cannot do anything "brave" or shareholders can sue them -- and often do. Major funds, institutions, and foreign investors don't care about civil rights, the environment, or women's rights. They care only about return on their investment.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Mondelēz International, Inc. is an American multinational confectionery, food and beverage conglomerate, employing around 107,000 people around the world. It comprises the global snack and food brands of the former Kraft Foods Inc. The Mondelēz name, adopted in 2012, came from the input of Kraft Foods employees at the time, a combination of the words for "world" and "delicious" in romance languages.[2][3]
wikipedia
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)That was a fun one. What a progressive company they are!
I really wish I could believe that these things were done out of any sense of humanity, but time and time again it's been shown to be profit motivated. I mean, hell, does anyone believe Walmart when they made a comment? No? Then why would you believe these other mega-corporations? Especially ones that have a history of anti-labor and anti-consumer policies. Welp, that's what you get in a capitalist system.
sammythecat
(3,568 posts)I googled "corporations are required by law to maximize return" and the results say there is no such law. It would be very difficult to ascertain the results of every single move made by a company anyway. It would be very hard to enforce as a law. What if management just isn't very smart? You could fire them, but did they break a law by making a dumb (unprofitable) decision? And sometimes they'd have to decide whether to do something that will make money over the next few months or something else that will make much more money but will take some years until the profits start rolling in.
This move by Honey Maid might very well be an entirely cynical move made by psychopaths. That's my first guess, sadly, but at least there is the possibility of at least some altruistic social responsibility going on here. In either, or any case, this will almost certainly work for their benefit. Hard to see how this would hurt them.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)and I probably won't try Nabisco for a while because they were not tasty. They had an odd after-taste that just was not appealing.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Hekate
(90,551 posts)I really need to get some graham crackers.
Cha
(296,807 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Kraft Foods Group Inc. and Mondelez International Inc. were sued by a U.S. regulator over claims they made $5.4 million by manipulating the price of wheat.
...
This case goes to the core of the CFTCs mission: protecting market participants and the public from manipulation and abusive practices that undermine the integrity of the derivatives markets, Aitan Goelman, CFTCs enforcement director, said in a statement.
You can also try Googling the company name with "child labor" and "human rights abuses," not to mention the allegations that their graham crackers sometimes smell like paint thinner, but don't let that stop you from getting all warm and fuzzy about an ad.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)If they knew what was really happening "under the hood" they wouldn't fall for the messages directed at them.
Marketing campaigns are the same thing. Appeal to emotions in the ads and never mind the inner workings of the company.
And just how wholesome are those crackers? Do they use GMOs? Preservatives? If they are made by a mega-corporation you can bet they aren't that healthy or wholesome.
So just because they advertise that they do what any normal human being should already be doing everyone is going to go out and buy their brand whilst forgetting all the other factors? It is sad to see on what is supposed to be a politically astute message board.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Sad is right.
Yet revealing this makes one a killjoy. Or worse.
spanone
(135,789 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,371 posts)how dare they infringe on Christians right to hate!!
samsingh
(17,590 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)They don't even control who buys their product. How on earth would they be able to discriminate against the LGBT community in so far as "serving" their products?
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Do you think companies just decide to make a product, then toss it out there with no idea who might buy it?
Or did you just think you could accuse them of opportunism and no one would notice?
Truly heavy sigh.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Seems as though they've got a big quality control problem. Misdirection is a valuable implement in the PR toolbox.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)This is the first time I've ever seen a DU post about a company's good deed get slammed for both "opportunism" and "misdirection" without links to credible sources.
Cui bono, indeed?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I can understand how you can't be bothered to read every post, but you might do yourself a favor and skim them at least.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6452592
cui bono
(19,926 posts)How is it not opportunistic? They saw a controversial current event that was trending and siezed the "opportunity" to exploit it.
And my original post you responded to had nothing to do with market research and who they believe their demographic to be. It clearly stated that they don't control who buys their product so they can't very well discriminate against LGBT. Or do you think they have ways of stopping LGBT from buying their product? Do they have advanced technology that senses a homosexual is picking up their box of crackers and then they have the box rigged to shock them? Do they have something in the the bar code that won't allow it to be scanned if the box was held by a homosexual? I think not.