Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,579 posts)
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 09:31 AM Apr 2015

Bloomberg: Rand Paul’s Favorite Union-Buster by Josh Eidelson


http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-04-03/rand-paul-s-favorite-union-buster

Last year, the Democrats who control the Kentucky House of Representatives killed a Republican proposal that would have made it illegal for unions to charge workers at private companies mandatory fees—in other words, to run union shops. One of the bill’s sponsors, Representative Jim DeCesare, assumed his option was to try again in the next General Assembly session. Then, at an October fundraiser for Senator Rand Paul in Bowling Green, DeCesare heard about a Tampa lawyer named Brent Yessin. He argues that counties and cities have the right to make labor policy, too. “Obviously,” DeCesare says, “we were extremely interested.”

In 1965, Kentucky’s highest court ruled that the town of Shelbyville couldn’t outlaw union shop contracts because the 1935 National Labor Relations Act preempts local labor laws. In 1990 a similar law passed by a New Mexico city was overturned by a federal district court for much the same reason. Letting local governments diverge on labor policy, says University of Toledo law professor Joseph Slater, “would certainly be a change in the way the law has always been interpreted.”

Yessin, who’s represented companies in more than 200 conflicts with unions, says those interpretations have been wrong all along. In his view, the NLRA—which was intended to standardize labor laws across the country—doesn’t block states from letting local officials regulate some union activities. Even if it did, he argues, Congress doesn’t have the power to take that authority away from cities and counties. “States never lost the ability to pass their own regulatory schemes regarding forced union dues,” he says. “It’s not up to Congress to tell them how to utilize it.”

“I always tell my clients, ‘Yeah, my mother was a scab.’ ”

Tampa lawyer Brent Yessin


Yessin’s ideas offer conservatives a path forward on anti-union legislation known as “right-to-work” laws. In March, Wisconsin became the 25th state to outlaw compulsory union fees. Ohio, where voters defeated curbs on public-sector unions in a 2011 referendum, is the only Republican-controlled state that hasn’t banned union shops. In the other 24 states, including Kentucky, Democrats have stalled the spread of right-to-work legislation. “Local jurisdictions throughout the commonwealth are fed up with waiting for a state or federal law that will provide them with the safety net from big labor they need,” Paul and his fellow Kentucky senator, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, wrote in a Feb. 8 op-ed for the Bowling Green Daily News.

FULL story at link.

I took a three days off without posting anything. I'm back at it.

OS

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bloomberg: Rand Paul’s Favorite Union-Buster by Josh Eidelson (Original Post) Omaha Steve Apr 2015 OP
darn, I thought this'd be about the Slime King MisterP Apr 2015 #1

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
1. darn, I thought this'd be about the Slime King
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 01:47 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Rick_Berman
I guess "all coal miners are Commies" can last only so long, especially with the USSR dead for a quarter century
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bloomberg: Rand Paul’s Fa...