Treasonous Child-Molesting Teapublican Criticises Hillary over her Emails.

[riqster]

https://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2015/04/03/treasonous-child-molesting-teapublican-criticises-hillary-over-her-emails/

Tons of source info at the link

And the “news” media is, as usual, ignoring his criminal status. Larry Klayman is an adjudicated, documented child molester and advocate for a violent coup against our nation. These facts are not in dispute. The man is a pedophiliac insurrectionist.

So when a traitorous pervert criticizes HRC for doing completely legal things with her email, one would think media outlets would ignore him. After all, what validity does Larry Klayman’s opinion have? “None” you would say, and you’d be right.

So why give the loathsome preeve airtime? Maybe it’s because most of our “news” media is owned by his fellow Teapublicans. So anything that bashes Dems, they’ll happily endorse. No matter who does the bashing. No matter if it’s a pack of lies.

Larry Klayman did horribly illegal things to his own children. Hillary did perfectly legal things to her own email. But the Infotainment Industry ignores his crimes and pretends that she is a criminal.

And people wonder why so many Americans are so ill-informed. Christ on a Teabag.

[Thinkingabout]

1. The thinking pattern of the TP is beginning to point to some needing some serious treatments.

They just do not think rational, wrong on biology, wrong on many issues. Here is a birther, a WND opinionist, and a serious hell raiser but doesn't think he does any wrong. Where are the FEMA camps when we need them, guess this was another RW lie also.

[ND-Dem]

2. I hold no brief for Klayman, but your claim exceeds the facts available.

{¶25} The issues raised by Klayman involve credibility assessments made by the magistrate. Klayman challenges these findings.

The magistrate heard evidence from the children's pediatrician who reported allegations of sexual abuse to children services, and from a social worker at children services who found that sexual abuse was "indicated."

Although the social worker's finding was later changed to "unsubstantiated" when Klayman appealed, the magistrate explained that the supervisor who changed the social worker's finding did not testify. The magistrate pointed out that he was obligated to make his own independent analysis based upon the parties and the evidence before him. In doing so, the magistrate found on more than one occasion [Klayman] act[ed] in a grossly inappropriate manner with the children.

His conduct may not have been sexual in the sense that he intended to or did derive any sexual pleasure from it or that he intended his children would. That, however, does not mean that he did not engage in those acts or that his behavior was proper.

The magistrate further found it significant that although Klayman denied any allegations of sexual abuse, he never denied that he did not engage in inappropriate behavior with the children. The magistrate further found it notable that Klayman, "for all his breast beating about his innocence * * * [he] scrupulously avoided being questioned by anyone from [children services] or from the Sheriff's Department about the allegations," and that he refused to answer any questions, repeatedly invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, about whether he inappropriately touched the children.

"Even more disturbing" to the magistrate was the fact that Klayman would not even answer the simple question regarding what he thought inappropriate touching was. The magistrate stated that he could draw an adverse inference from Klayman's decision not to testify to these matters because it was a civil proceeding, not criminal.


http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2013/02/birther_lawyer_fighting_joe_ar.php

[riqster]

3. If I were unjustly accused of molestation, I'd sure as hell work to prove my innocence.

The fact that he chose instead to plead the 5th says a lot.

[ND-Dem]

4. It was a civil proceeding. No criminal charges were ever made that I've been able to find.

If you have other evidence, please post it.

Your claims are less than true, but they do contribute to the "ill-informing" of America in the interest of propaganda.

Larry Klayman is an adjudicated, documented child molester...

Larry Klayman did horribly illegal things to his own children....

And people wonder why so many Americans are so ill-informed...

Not that it should need to be said, but I'm not pro-Klayman or pro-molesters. I just don't like this type of half-truth.