Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Blue Flower

(5,442 posts)
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 11:10 AM Apr 2015

What if Iran had a bomb? A thought experiment

(Posted in its entirety because it came to my email box from tikkun.com)

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Bomb?
by Uri Avnery, Tel Aviv, Israel

I MUST start with a shocking confession: I am not afraid of the Iranian nuclear bomb. I know that this makes me an abnormal person, almost a freak. But what can I do? I am unable to work up fear, like a real Israeli. Try as I may, the Iranian bomb does not make me hysterical. MY FATHER once taught me how to withstand blackmail: imagine that the awful threat of the blackmailer has already come about. Then you can tell him: Go to hell.

I have tried many times to follow this advice and found it sound. So now I apply it to the Iranian bomb: I imagine that the worst has already happened: the awful ayatollahs have got the bombs that can eradicate little Israel in a minute. So what? According to foreign experts, Israel has several hundred nuclear bombs (assessments vary between 80-400. If Iran sends its bombs and obliterates most of Israel (myself included), Israeli submarines will obliterate Iran. Whatever I might think about Binyamin Netanyahu, I rely on him and our security chiefs to keep our "second strike" capability intact. Just last week we were informed that Germany had delivered another state-of-the-art submarine to our navy for this purpose.

Israeli idiots – and there are some around – respond: "Yes, but the Iranian leaders are not normal people. They are madmen. Religious fanatics. They will risk the total destruction of Iran just to destroy the Zionist state. Like exchanging queens in chess."
Such convictions are the outcome of decades of demonizing. Iranians – or at least their leaders – are seen as subhuman miscreants.
Reality shows us that the leaders of Iran are very sober, very calculating politicians. Cautious merchants in the Iranian bazaar style. They don't take unnecessary risks. The revolutionary fervor of the early Khomeini days is long past, and even Khomeini would not have dreamt of doing anything so close to national suicide.

ACCORDING TO the Bible, the great Persian king Cyrus allowed the captive Jews of Babylon to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple. At that time, Persia was already an ancient civilization – both cultural and political. After the "return from Babylon", the Jewish commonwealth around Jerusalem lived for 200 years under Persian suzerainty. I was taught in school that these were happy years for the Jews. Since then, Persian culture and history has lived through another two and a half millennia. Persian civilization is one of the oldest in the world. It has created a great religion and influenced many others, including Judaism. Iranians are fiercely proud of that civilization.

To imagine that the present leaders of Iran would even contemplate risking the very existence of Persia out of hatred of Israel is both ridiculous and megalomaniac. Moreover, throughout history, relations between Jews and Persians have almost always been excellent. When Israel was founded, Iran was considered a natural ally, part of David Ben-Gurion's "strategy of the periphery" – an alliance with all the countries surrounding the Arab world.

The Shah, who was re-installed by the American and British secret services, was a very close ally. Teheran was full of Israeli businessmen and military advisers. It served as a base for the Israeli agents working with the rebellious Kurds in northern Iraq who were fighting against the regime of Saddam Hussein. fter the Islamic revolution, Israel still supported Iran against Iraq in their cruel 8-year war. The notorious Irangate affair, in which my friend Amiram Nir and Oliver North played such an important role, would not have been possible without the old Iranian-Israeli ties. Even now, Iran and Israel are conducting amiable arbitration proceedings about an old venture: the Eilat-Ashkelon oil pipeline built jointly by the two countries.

If the worst comes to the worst, nuclear Israel and nuclear Iran will live in a Balance of Terror. Highly unpleasant, indeed. But not an existential menace. HOWEVER, FOR those who live in terror of the Iranian nuclear capabilities, I have a piece of advice: use the time we still have. Under the American-Iranian deal, we have at least 10 years before Iran could start the final phase of producing the bomb. Please use this time for making peace. The Iranian hatred of the "Zionist Regime" – the State of Israel – derives from the fate of the Palestinian people. The feeling of solidarity for the helpless Palestinians is deeply ingrained in all Islamic peoples. It is part of the popular culture in all of them. It is quite real, even if the political regimes misuse, manipulate or ignore it. Since there is no ground for a specific Iranian hatred of Israel, it is solely based on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. No conflict, no enmity.

Logic tells us: if we have several years before we have to live in the shadow of an Iranian nuclear bomb, let's use this time to eliminate the conflict. Once the Palestinians themselves declare that they consider the historic conflict with Israel settled, no Iranian leadership will be able to rouse its people against us. FOR SEVERAL weeks now, Netanyahu has been priding himself publicly on a huge, indeed historic, achievement. For the first time ever, Israel is practically part of an Arab alliance.

Throughout the region, the conflict between Muslim Sunnis and Muslim Shiites is raging. The Shiite camp, headed by Iran, includes the Shiites in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. (Netanyahu falsely - or out of ignorance - includes the Sunni Hamas in this camp.) The opposite Sunni camp includes Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Gulf states. Netanyahu hints that Israel is now secretly accepted by them as a member.

It is a very untidy picture. Iran is fighting against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, which is a mortal enemy of Israel. Iran is supporting the Assad regime in Damascus, which is also supported by Hezbollah, which fights against the lslamic State, while the Saudis support other extreme Sunni Syrians who fight against Assad and the Islamic State. Turkey supports Iran and the Saudis while fighting against Assad. And so on. I am not enamored with Arab military dictatorships and corrupt monarchies. Frankly, I detest them. But if Israel succeeds in becoming an official member of any Arab coalition, it would be a historic breakthrough, the first in 130 years of Zionist-Arab conflict. However, all Israeli relations with Arab countries are secret, except those with Egypt and Jordan, and even with these two the contacts are cold and distant, relations between the regimes rather than between the peoples.

Let's face facts: no Arab state will engage in open and close cooperation with Israel before the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is ended. Even kings and dictators cannot afford to do so. The solidarity of their peoples with the oppressed Palestinians is far too profound.
Real peace with the Arab countries is impossible without peace with the Palestinian people, as peace with the Palestinian people is impossible without peace with the Arab countries.

So if there is now a chance to establish official peace with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and to turn the cold peace with Egypt into a real one, Netanyahu should jump at it. The terms of an agreement are already lying on the table: the Saudi peace plan, also called the Arab Initiative, which was adopted many years ago by the entire Arab League. It is based on the two-state solution of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Netanyahu could amaze the whole world by "doing a de Gaulle" – making peace with the Sunni Arab world (as de Gaulle did with Algeria) which would compel the Shiites to follow suit.

Do I believe in this? I do not. But if God wills it, even a broomstick can shoot. And on the day of the Jewish Pesach feast, commemorating the (imaginary) exodus from Egypt, we are reminding ourselves that miracles do happen.



web: www.spiritualprogressives.org
email: info@spiritualprogressives.org
Click here to unsubscribe

Copyright © 2014 Network of Spiritual Progressives®.
2342 Shattuck Avenue, #1200
Berkeley, CA 94704
510-644-1200 Fax 510-644-1255
empowered by Salsa


--



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What if Iran had a bomb? A thought experiment (Original Post) The Blue Flower Apr 2015 OP
k and r obxhead Apr 2015 #1
To me the fear is Yupster Apr 2015 #2
No, if god forbid that happened, they would find someone to blame. still_one Apr 2015 #3
It's been my worry Yupster Apr 2015 #4
It is a valid concern still_one Apr 2015 #12
You missed the biggest missing part of the deal. ieoeja Apr 2015 #13
Iranians aren't stupid angryvet Apr 2015 #5
A rather long 2naSalit Apr 2015 #6
That bolded portion is 100 percent BS oberliner Apr 2015 #7
Hey, guess who showed up at that Holocaust Denial conference in October 2014 SidDithers Apr 2015 #8
Confirms what she is all about oberliner Apr 2015 #14
So says you... 2naSalit Apr 2015 #9
And your OP is a greater example 2naSalit Apr 2015 #11
Kick for hifiguy Apr 2015 #10
Exactly - the whole narrative assumes that Israel, and the US, can "handle our nukes better" phantom power Apr 2015 #15

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
4. It's been my worry
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 11:58 AM
Apr 2015

The Franz Ferdinand scenario that started World War I.

A terrorist does something, and everyone denies involvement and then the alliances kick in and we're in a war.

To me that's the fear. A truck bomb goes off in Haifa. Everyone denies and Israel blames Iran and hits back and we have a World War.

I wish two more things were part of the deal.

1. Release of a few Americans who have been held in Iranian jails.

2. Recognition by the Iranian government of Israel's right to exist.

and a third change would have been nice too

3. Repeal of law making homosexuality a very serious crime in Iran.

I know but one can hope. Really the first one should have been included. Those type of good will gestures typically accompany treaties.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
13. You missed the biggest missing part of the deal.
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 03:13 PM
Apr 2015

0. Privatize Iran's oil fields.


Without a nuclear weapons program in Iran, there is no valid excuse for sanctions.

Without sanctions, there is no leverage to privatize their oil.


Fuck the nukes! Everybody knew MAD would ensure the nukes were never used. Republicans are upset that we are losing our leverage to privatize Iran's oil. Which is why no Republican complaining about this deal has yet to offer a single concrete issue item missing in the deal. They have a reason, but know they can't say it.

You just offered better criticism of this deal than those guys.

angryvet

(181 posts)
5. Iranians aren't stupid
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 01:07 PM
Apr 2015

they know if they bombed Israel...they'd be blown into pieces. That's why we never went to war with Russia...or them with us.

2naSalit

(86,574 posts)
6. A rather long
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 01:52 PM
Apr 2015

and well thought out article. It's pretty long with many important points. One that stands out for me is this one:


If the worst comes to the worst, nuclear Israel and nuclear Iran will live in a Balance of Terror. Highly unpleasant, indeed. But not an existential menace. HOWEVER, FOR those who live in terror of the Iranian nuclear capabilities, I have a piece of advice: use the time we still have. Under the American-Iranian deal, we have at least 10 years before Iran could start the final phase of producing the bomb. Please use this time for making peace. The Iranian hatred of the "Zionist Regime" – the State of Israel – derives from the fate of the Palestinian people. The feeling of solidarity for the helpless Palestinians is deeply ingrained in all Islamic peoples. It is part of the popular culture in all of them. It is quite real, even if the political regimes misuse, manipulate or ignore it. Since there is no ground for a specific Iranian hatred of Israel, it is solely based on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. No conflict, no enmity.



It it why there is often the denial of israel's "right" to exist because of how the Palestinians have been treated since the establishment of israel and the blatant confiscation of Palestinian property solely to create israel out of the confiscated property. That is and has always been the point being made but the facilitators, us, will have nothing to do with this injustice regarding the valid claims of the Palestinians then or since.
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
7. That bolded portion is 100 percent BS
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 01:55 PM
Apr 2015

Explain to me how hosting a Holocaust Denial Conference year after year is somehow derived from support for the Palestinian people.

And your comments below show a complete lack of understanding of the history of Israel and its foundation.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
8. Hey, guess who showed up at that Holocaust Denial conference in October 2014
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 02:05 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113483103




Yup, everyone's favourite #StandWithRand, anti-Semite Medea Benjamin.

She's even got a Code Pink headscarf. Isn't that cute.

Sid

2naSalit

(86,574 posts)
9. So says you...
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 02:09 PM
Apr 2015

so humor me and point out all the incorrectness I presented in detail. Please include reference so we can all check and compare notes.

thank you,

2na

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
10. Kick for
Fri Apr 3, 2015, 02:18 PM
Apr 2015

a ver thoughtful and intelligent article.

And people do tend to forget that Persian culture is extremely old. IIRC only the Chinese culture has a longer unbroken run. It's not something any Iranian is going to throw away.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
15. Exactly - the whole narrative assumes that Israel, and the US, can "handle our nukes better"
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 10:15 AM
Apr 2015

I reject the premise.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if Iran had a bomb? ...