Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 08:44 PM May 2012

Vogue magazine's new policy bans skinny models


Bony, emaciated and sad-looking models will be out of work thanks to a new policy by the stylemakers.

Nineteen editors of Vogue magazines throughout the world, including Kirstie Clements in Australia, made a pact yesterday to use healthy models.

They promised to stop publishing photos of "listless, grey-looking" super-thin girls and any model under 16.

"We have the ability to start an industry dialogue, in conjunction with designers, to start making a change," Clements said.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/help-at-hand-for-hiv-sufferers/story-fn7x8me2-1226347314874
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vogue magazine's new policy bans skinny models (Original Post) Baitball Blogger May 2012 OP
BRAVO!!! Odin2005 May 2012 #1
So they just can't seem listless? LeftyMom May 2012 #2
"Healthy" in fashion terms = size 4 instead of size 0. Myrina May 2012 #3
Better for the kids, at least. DCKit May 2012 #6
So instead of size 0 models LadyHawkAZ May 2012 #4
A little bit vague about it aren't they. How about some specifics like no one more than 5% below.... yourout May 2012 #5
How about some curvaceous, in other words, "mature-looking" middle-aged and older women, JDPriestly May 2012 #7
.. abelenkpe May 2012 #8
Absolutely. JDPriestly May 2012 #12
Now you're talkin' guitar man May 2012 #10
Agreed !!! I'm a husky guy.... rppper May 2012 #13
I'm a thin guy guitar man May 2012 #14
don't most Magazines now have Actors/Singers on their cover instead of models ? JI7 May 2012 #9
what are they gonna do about the photoshopped ads? pansypoo53219 May 2012 #11
Praise the Lord! Number23 May 2012 #15
How about some realism? JNelson6563 May 2012 #16
There are technical problems... Mopar151 May 2012 #17

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
2. So they just can't seem listless?
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:01 PM
May 2012

I guess that means it's time for the regular shift from heroin chic to coke?

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
3. "Healthy" in fashion terms = size 4 instead of size 0.
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:42 PM
May 2012

No gain for the majority of us women-folk who run 12/14.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
6. Better for the kids, at least.
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:42 PM
May 2012

It is a gain. If you need things to move faster, then get involved.

The painted corpses of teenagers as fashion icons has been the standard for two decades, it's a problem that's not going to be resolved in one fell swoop.

Your concern is noted.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
4. So instead of size 0 models
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:42 PM
May 2012

they will be moving to size 2, and just photoshopping them down to size 0?

I'll believe this when I see it.

yourout

(7,526 posts)
5. A little bit vague about it aren't they. How about some specifics like no one more than 5% below....
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:45 PM
May 2012

their ideal weight on the BMI chart?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
7. How about some curvaceous, in other words, "mature-looking" middle-aged and older women,
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:19 PM
May 2012

maybe some that approach a high weight for their height? And how about designing clothes that flatter such women?

The average American woman weighs a healthy weight or slightly above.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
8. ..
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:46 PM
May 2012

"And how about designing clothes that flatter such women? "

I'm not sure who clothes today are designed for. Lately I see jumpsuits are the rage. Really? Who wants to completely disrobe every time they have to visit the loo? And these one shouldered and tube top tops. I'm sure those would go over well on the average woman in the workplace. Lots of sheer tops out now too. I swear clothes today are designed for women who don't work, use the bathroom or ever even consider bending over.

rppper

(2,952 posts)
13. Agreed !!! I'm a husky guy....
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:24 AM
May 2012

...I like a healthy woman! Thick even!

Soft and curvy=feminine....

It's way past time that magazines started doing this....they have a lot of blood on their hands(via eating disorders and such)to account for IMHO .

guitar man

(15,996 posts)
14. I'm a thin guy
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:30 AM
May 2012

And I've been married to a big bouncy woman for 20 years. Wouldn't have it any other way

pansypoo53219

(20,966 posts)
11. what are they gonna do about the photoshopped ads?
Sat May 5, 2012, 12:39 AM
May 2012

i was appalled last time i looked at it. the unreality of the human 'figure'.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
15. Praise the Lord!
Sat May 5, 2012, 05:49 AM
May 2012

Next up, a Vogue issue that features more than 3 token models of color out of 247 in the entire magazine.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
16. How about some realism?
Sat May 5, 2012, 06:41 AM
May 2012

I'd like to see models of all sizes and colors on the magazines. We women come in all shapes and sizes (yes, there are even some who are naturally thin), why can't our representation be that way too? We also cover the entire flesh-tone spectrum. Not sure why magazines can't reflect these things.

Julie

Mopar151

(9,977 posts)
17. There are technical problems...
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:27 AM
May 2012

Clothes are drawn, and sold, in 2 dimensions. If you want clothes that look good on a hangar, or on a flat piece of paper, you need to model them on someone built like a coat hangar, and flat front and back.

Couture (high-end, custom made) buyers are rich, generally - and these days, that means skinny. And many within the business are lifelong dieters, who see normal subcutaneous fat, or visible muscle, as a lack of self-discipline.

If you design clothing for Venus Williams, Michelle Obama, or Laila Ali, you run the risk of the model "overpowering the clothes" - the prospective buyer may remember the model rather than the ensemble.

And it is much more difficult to design clothing to fit the many configurations of "curvy" women (to me, it's viva le' difference), than to wrap a yardstick.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vogue magazine's new poli...