General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVogue magazine's new policy bans skinny models
Bony, emaciated and sad-looking models will be out of work thanks to a new policy by the stylemakers.
Nineteen editors of Vogue magazines throughout the world, including Kirstie Clements in Australia, made a pact yesterday to use healthy models.
They promised to stop publishing photos of "listless, grey-looking" super-thin girls and any model under 16.
"We have the ability to start an industry dialogue, in conjunction with designers, to start making a change," Clements said.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/help-at-hand-for-hiv-sufferers/story-fn7x8me2-1226347314874
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)I guess that means it's time for the regular shift from heroin chic to coke?
Myrina
(12,296 posts)No gain for the majority of us women-folk who run 12/14.
DCKit
(18,541 posts)It is a gain. If you need things to move faster, then get involved.
The painted corpses of teenagers as fashion icons has been the standard for two decades, it's a problem that's not going to be resolved in one fell swoop.
Your concern is noted.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)they will be moving to size 2, and just photoshopping them down to size 0?
I'll believe this when I see it.
yourout
(7,526 posts)their ideal weight on the BMI chart?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)maybe some that approach a high weight for their height? And how about designing clothes that flatter such women?
The average American woman weighs a healthy weight or slightly above.
"And how about designing clothes that flatter such women? "
I'm not sure who clothes today are designed for. Lately I see jumpsuits are the rage. Really? Who wants to completely disrobe every time they have to visit the loo? And these one shouldered and tube top tops. I'm sure those would go over well on the average woman in the workplace. Lots of sheer tops out now too. I swear clothes today are designed for women who don't work, use the bathroom or ever even consider bending over.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)And those bright colored, large design prints? Hotel drapes anyone?
guitar man
(15,996 posts)With some nice big butts....and I cannot lie
rppper
(2,952 posts)...I like a healthy woman! Thick even!
Soft and curvy=feminine....
It's way past time that magazines started doing this....they have a lot of blood on their hands(via eating disorders and such)to account for IMHO .
guitar man
(15,996 posts)And I've been married to a big bouncy woman for 20 years. Wouldn't have it any other way
JI7
(89,244 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,966 posts)i was appalled last time i looked at it. the unreality of the human 'figure'.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Next up, a Vogue issue that features more than 3 token models of color out of 247 in the entire magazine.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)I'd like to see models of all sizes and colors on the magazines. We women come in all shapes and sizes (yes, there are even some who are naturally thin), why can't our representation be that way too? We also cover the entire flesh-tone spectrum. Not sure why magazines can't reflect these things.
Julie
Mopar151
(9,977 posts)Clothes are drawn, and sold, in 2 dimensions. If you want clothes that look good on a hangar, or on a flat piece of paper, you need to model them on someone built like a coat hangar, and flat front and back.
Couture (high-end, custom made) buyers are rich, generally - and these days, that means skinny. And many within the business are lifelong dieters, who see normal subcutaneous fat, or visible muscle, as a lack of self-discipline.
If you design clothing for Venus Williams, Michelle Obama, or Laila Ali, you run the risk of the model "overpowering the clothes" - the prospective buyer may remember the model rather than the ensemble.
And it is much more difficult to design clothing to fit the many configurations of "curvy" women (to me, it's viva le' difference), than to wrap a yardstick.