Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:03 PM Apr 2015

Seeing a Cash Cow in Museums’ Precious Art

I found this article absolutely chilling. I really can see a future where the Jamie Dimon's of the world have art that was enjoyed by all of us in their private collections. People had better wake up.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/arts/design/seeing-a-cash-cow-in-museums-precious-art.html?_r=0

MÜNSTER, Germany — The director of the art museum here dreads the idea of losing some of his town’s biggest cultural attractions. He worries about a Henry Moore sculpture that has been on exhibition for almost 40 years, knowing it could vanish along with Renaissance panels and Eduardo Chillida benches in a sale to settle government debts.

“There’s an expression in German: ‘Don’t sell your family silver,’ ” said the director, Hermann Arnhold of the Westphalian State Museum for Art and Cultural History. “Would you sell the story of your family? If you sell important artworks, that means selling a part of your history.”

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seeing a Cash Cow in Museums’ Precious Art (Original Post) Puglover Apr 2015 OP
Break the government then you can pilfer the assets liberal N proud Apr 2015 #1
Same thing for the USPO. Puglover Apr 2015 #2
My son and I spend a lot of time at the Denver Art Museum... SomethingFishy Apr 2015 #3
The article mentions 1000's of pieces Puglover Apr 2015 #4
Most museums normally DO try to rotate eshibits pinboy3niner Apr 2015 #6
Yup or send them out as a collection on tour.. SomethingFishy Apr 2015 #9
This, fortunately, can not currently happen in the US frazzled Apr 2015 #5
Wasn't that exactly what was being contemplated in Detroit, I think it was? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #8
Yes, but it didn't happen frazzled Apr 2015 #10
Rent it out? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #7

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
1. Break the government then you can pilfer the assets
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:09 PM
Apr 2015

That is the true conservative agenda when they talk smaller government.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
2. Same thing for the USPO.
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:11 PM
Apr 2015

Break by enacting impossible payments for future retirees and then when it's broken go after that money. It's classic.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
3. My son and I spend a lot of time at the Denver Art Museum...
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:15 PM
Apr 2015

and when I walk through there we sometimes talk about all the private collections, and all the incredible works of beauty that will never be seen because they are gathering dust in some rich assholes living room.

You want to collect art? Collect it and give it to a museum to display. Great works of art are not just for the rich.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
4. The article mentions 1000's of pieces
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:19 PM
Apr 2015

that never see the light of day in museums due to space limitations. I thought "So rotate the goddamned things"

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
6. Most museums normally DO try to rotate eshibits
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:42 PM
Apr 2015

I remember visiting the Smithsonian decades ago on a special tour to their "attic" where I saw the original "Teddy bear," JFK's rocking chair, and Lincoln's desk. They were only off display at the time because of exhibit rotation.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
9. Yup or send them out as a collection on tour..
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 09:51 PM
Apr 2015

Our museum has a bunch of permanent stuff and then traveling exhibits.. We go whenever they bring in a new exhibit.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
5. This, fortunately, can not currently happen in the US
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:28 PM
Apr 2015

Or at least not happen easily. The code of ethics of the Association of American Museum Directors (AAMD) specifies that works of art may not be sold “for purposes other than acquisitions of works of art for the collection.” In other words, a museum can't sell works to cover operating expenses or deficits; only to buy other (perhaps more relevant or desirable) works. Those who attempt to do so (recently, e.g., the National Academy Museum in New York, or Brandeis University's Rose Art Museum) have been met with swift reprisals—sanctions so severe and backlash so rampant that the Rose, for example, had to rescind its plan to deaccession any works.

Of course, that body could some day change its ethics code, which specifies that works are "“held in trust for the public” and which keeps museums in good public standing. But for now, this ain't gonna happen in the US on any scale.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
8. Wasn't that exactly what was being contemplated in Detroit, I think it was?
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:47 PM
Apr 2015

Where the 'Emergency Manager' appointed by the Republican governor was considering looting the museum to try and pay off bills?

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
10. Yes, but it didn't happen
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 11:39 PM
Apr 2015

And the Detroit museum is a bit unusual: the museum, and the works in it, are owned by the city. Still, there was too big an outcry, and money was raised elsewhere.

It would have been so short-sighted had they actually gone through with selling the art.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
7. Rent it out?
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 07:46 PM
Apr 2015

Instead of selling it outright, what about renting it out for say, 3 months out of the year, with insanely high contracts such that if someone you rent it to lets it get damaged or stolen, they owe you ten times the appraised value?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seeing a Cash Cow in Muse...