Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Malraiders

(444 posts) Wed Apr 8, 2015, 04:51 PM Apr 2015

What the cops said about W Scotts murder before they

knew that there was a video of the shooting.

Of course they were going on the cops account of the event.

Read it here:

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/04/07/3644189/everything-police-said-walter-scotts-death-video-showed-really-happened/

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the cops said about W Scotts murder before they (Original Post) Malraiders Apr 2015 OP

This clearly implicates the second officer as an accomplice after the fact of murder. leveymg Apr 2015 #1

leveymg

(36,418 posts)

1. This clearly implicates the second officer as an accomplice after the fact of murder.

Reply to Malraiders (Original post)

Wed Apr 8, 2015, 04:59 PM

Apr 2015

The other cop didn't own up to what he saw - if nothing else, he saw the shooter moving the taser closer to the body.

Do cops have classes where they learn to cover up, tamper with evidence, and falsify reports - or are they just scared to break the code of silence?

Reply to this discussion