Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:18 PM Apr 2015

New Texas Bill Would Prevent Bystanders From Recording Cops

A bill introduced in the Texas House of Representatives would make it illegal for private citizens to record police within 25 feet.

House Bill 2918, introduced by state Rep. Jason Villalba (R-Dallas) on Tuesday, would make the offense a misdemeanor. Citizens who are armed would not be permitted to record police activity within 100 feet of an officer, according to the Houston Chronicle.

Only representatives of radio or TV organizations that hold an FCC license, newspapers and magazines would have the right to record police. The legislator disagreed with people on Twitter who said he's seeking to make all filming of cops illegal.

"My bill ... just asks filmers to stand back a little so as not to interfere with law enforcement," Villalba tweeted.

The bill would go against precedent set in 2011 by an appeals court, which found that citizens are allowed to record police, according to the ACLU.

More: Crooks and Liars

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Texas Bill Would Prevent Bystanders From Recording Cops (Original Post) Unknown Beatle Apr 2015 OP
Ignorant fucks representing ignorant fucks. GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #1
I'd feel better if you said "protecting" instead of "representing." ScreamingMeemie Apr 2015 #20
Gee, I wonder what motivated that moran hifiguy Apr 2015 #2
They're our cops. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #3
organized crime doesnt like being videoed nt msongs Apr 2015 #4
They should call it the police enhanced target practice bill aint_no_life_nowhere Apr 2015 #5
Our local paper does not have a photographer Downwinder Apr 2015 #6
I recall not too long ago a call in Ill, for the government to license journalists. Glassunion Apr 2015 #9
if the police are following the law guillaumeb Apr 2015 #7
AS long as cops like in Ferguson and this last one are executing black folk for no reason, then NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #8
I like the idea of gun toters having to stay 100 feet away. Heck they ought to Hoyt Apr 2015 #10
This is outrageous marym625 Apr 2015 #11
25 feet would make many circumstances impossible to record. Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #12
This goes against Glik v. Cunniffe herding cats Apr 2015 #13
Because wheel of fortune is on the teevee. Glassunion Apr 2015 #16
The Scott video should be the only testimony required ThoughtCriminal Apr 2015 #14
Hey Jason! If they have done nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide. muntrv Apr 2015 #15
This is a direct response to Open Carry Tarrant County and a guy named Kory Watkins. flamin lib Apr 2015 #17
Good point. I don't believe police should have to worry about some yahoo like this while trying to Hoyt Apr 2015 #22
Hey… no problem- just get an FCC license and you're in! MrMickeysMom Apr 2015 #18
this is intended to let police murder innocent black men and minorities samsingh Apr 2015 #19
I guess this clown has never seen . . . OldRedneck Apr 2015 #21

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
20. I'd feel better if you said "protecting" instead of "representing."
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 08:59 PM
Apr 2015

The majority of Texans are not police officers, so they are not "representing" us, and I am not an "ignorant fuck." Thank you.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
2. Gee, I wonder what motivated that moran
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:27 PM
Apr 2015

to introduce such a blatantly unconstitutional measure. I just wonder....

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
3. They're our cops.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:28 PM
Apr 2015

We paid for them, we outfitted them using our money, we own the laws they enforce.

If they serve they serve at our pleasure.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
5. They should call it the police enhanced target practice bill
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:30 PM
Apr 2015

Who could possibly object to our law enforcement authorities getting in all the unobstructed target practice they can possibly get?

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
9. I recall not too long ago a call in Ill, for the government to license journalists.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:39 PM
Apr 2015

If you didn't work for a MSM outlet, you could be denied privileges and rights afforded to journalists.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
7. if the police are following the law
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:36 PM
Apr 2015

they should WELCOME the taping. It could work to their advantage.

IF they are following the law, that is.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
8. AS long as cops like in Ferguson and this last one are executing black folk for no reason, then
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:37 PM
Apr 2015

yes, videotaping is bad.


Just wait, you stupid fucking racist kochsucking dumbshits, your day is coming

You think cops are gonna put up with your shit when you are homeless, which you will be soon

no, they wont

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
10. I like the idea of gun toters having to stay 100 feet away. Heck they ought to
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:43 PM
Apr 2015

require gun toters to remain at least that far away from all citizens.

Nor do I have a problem saying a person can't MOVE IN closer than 25 feet to record something. No question that police need to be held accountable, but they don't need people getting into the middle of a dangerous situation either. If they are already that close, i'd be against charges.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
11. This is outrageous
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:46 PM
Apr 2015

And I am sure that the guy that is getting everyone to record police is part of the reason

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
12. 25 feet would make many circumstances impossible to record.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:47 PM
Apr 2015


such as inside houses, from inside a car when an officer approaches, and would allow an officer to stop anyone from videoing (or turn it into a crime) simply by approaching or questioning them.








herding cats

(19,558 posts)
13. This goes against Glik v. Cunniffe
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 08:05 PM
Apr 2015

If they do pass this it will be appealed on it's first use and tossed out.

What I don't get is why citizens aren't up in arms over their lawmakers wasting tax dollars on legislation such as this which goes against already established law?

ThoughtCriminal

(14,047 posts)
14. The Scott video should be the only testimony required
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 08:06 PM
Apr 2015

to kill this idea instantly. But, we're talking Texas Republicans here so...

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
17. This is a direct response to Open Carry Tarrant County and a guy named Kory Watkins.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 08:43 PM
Apr 2015

He set up "cop watch" which recorded every police interaction with civilians as close as possible while wearing an AK 47 over his shoulder. In one instance he tried to sue the Arlington PD for threatening him with a car while he stood in the street taping a traffic stop.

Not saying the proposed law is good, just giving background. I owe Kory a vote of thanks for singlehandedly defeating "Constitutional Carry" by threatening TX legislators with death over being "traitors to the Constitution". Search YouTube for Kory Watkins.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
22. Good point. I don't believe police should have to worry about some yahoo like this while trying to
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:55 AM
Apr 2015

handle a situation. It doesn't help. I'm fine with filming, and all police should wear a video cam, but armed yahoos like this are not helping anything.



 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
21. I guess this clown has never seen . . .
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 10:18 PM
Apr 2015

I guess this clown has never seen the almost palm-sized video cameras with 52X zoom!!

Sony, Canon, Samsung . . . go to Amazon or eBay and stock up!!!!!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Texas Bill Would Prev...