General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPost analysis finds few prosecutions among thousands of fatal shootings by on-duty police
Ref: Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/04/11/thousands-dead-few-prosecuted/?wpisrc=al_alert
I've been viewing posts and videos here, listening to what my fellow DUers have to say. Again and again, there are low post numbered therein
Are the more "privileged" of color that silent? Have any of you written to the aforementioned police departments informing them that we are watching them closely? Or, are you afraid of being watched closely yourselves? Actually, I'm not afraid of that at all, since we are already watched closely.
May as well tell them what you think and how unacceptable you think this is.
RealityAdvocate
(106 posts)It seems silly to think police are not frequently put into situations in which deadly force is justifiable.
I'm surprised at the 54 charged number -- that seems higher than I would have thought, and surprisingly appropriate as a percentage of total police shootings.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)By systemic I mean structures that determine who/what category of persons gets to make reports, how and which institutions get to define justifiable, etc.
The assent by courts that pain is a legitimate means of LE gaining compliance completely boogles the mind about the morality of the rightness with which authorities define justability.
The
n there the issues of non-institutionalized but present issues that surround whether or not citizens are looking for such problems and reporting and whether the news media is sharing them. Currently American society has an attitude wherein institutional excuses and rationales aren't accepted and the misuse of force is being increasingly called out and publicized.
For decades police controlled the narratives around these events and the media dutifully and boringly went about the task of reporting findings of often pro-LE boards of internal and community oversight that force, lethal and otherwise was justified.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Truth, borne by statistics where I live in SW Pennsylvania show that in this town of about 28k people, most police calls are for traffic violations and retail thefts.
Shootings justifiable? Look at the number of times police have to shoot, and the type of call it was. THAT should tell you that an extremely small number are justifiable. "Tasors are a blessing", so goes the opinion of those who would normally drawn their service revolver.
Now, instead of asking what percentage of shootings are NOT justifiable, why don't you explain why the percentiles ARE justifiable?
RealityAdvocate
(106 posts)Response to RealityAdvocate (Reply #5)
Post removed
RealityAdvocate
(106 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)"roughly"?
RealityAdvocate
(106 posts)Roughly 50,000 of 533,000.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Are we comparing the number of persons assaulted or killed?
RealityAdvocate
(106 posts)There are roughly 50,000 cops assaulted annually. Some of those are deadly force assaults.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)since the early late 1960, early 1970s, or that crime statistics have crashed starting in 1992. Yet. the siege mentality and the culture of police, the militarization, has increased.
Want to talk statistics? I am all open to it. By the way, the assault number you quoted is from the UCR, for 2013,
The exact number is...49, 851
And law enforcement is hardly the most dangerous job out there either. For some odd reason fire personnel do not keep flogging that horse though, and theirs is far more dangerous than police.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Are you going to take the position that murder should be the response to police assault?
RealityAdvocate
(106 posts)It's unrealistic to expect there to be zero police shootings. There are plenty of murderers, rapists and other violent criminals arrested every year. Some of them don't go down without a fight. Some of them fight to the death.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Or when some guy's face assaulted the cop's fist?
I grant that police are sometimes assaulted, but I'm also old enough to treat official police reports as works of fiction until otherwise verified.
The cops have managed to earn all the mistrust, fear, loathing, and skepticism they face.
treestar
(82,383 posts)a white cop viciously shooting a black kid.
It probably would be more complex than that.
And the article contains no statistics about all of the shootings - only one breakdown for race of the 54 - where it was more predominant for white cops to shoot black citizens.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)If anything, this article CALLS for those statistics to be logged in a transparent way. We have a long way to go before we know the truth.
Meanwhile, I ASSUME that we have a pre-conceived notion growing up that the police will act in accordance with the law in a step-fashion manner to reduce escalation of aggression at either THEIR level or the ACTOR's locus of control.
Good policing would assure that this be the model. Bad policing doesn't give a shit how badly you finish what you're responding to.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)we need braver police....the only reason data is not required to be reported is to keep the public in the dark on the total number of citizens who are killed or die at the hands of law enforcement....other wise knowing such data could possibly piss us off..........
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)
a citizen's police review board, which any local government can create. The people on this board should serve no longer than one term, and that term should be appointed every two years in a staggered fashion.
That will help the transparency.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Braver? Good grief. Though I have seen the sentiment they should be willing to be killed rather than ever defend themselves.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)If that is the case, then we either need braver or more honest people to be cops.
Let's face it, the system is broken, cops will NEVER turn on each other, they all saw "Serpico"