Are Americans in Rome behind the nuns crackdown?

[marmar]

Are Americans in Rome behind the nuns crackdown?
By David Gibson| Religion News Service, Published: May 4


When the Vatican last month announced a doctrinal crackdown on the leadership organization representing most of the 57,000 nuns in the U.S., the sisters said they were “stunned” by the move. Many American Catholics, meanwhile, were angry at what they saw as Rome bullying women whose lives of service have endeared them to the public.

Vatican watchers also were perplexed since a broader, parallel investigation of women’s religious orders in the U.S. was resolved amicably after an initial clash. That seemed to augur a more diplomatic approach by the Vatican to concerns that American nuns were not sufficiently orthodox.

Now it turns out that conservative American churchmen living in Rome — including disgraced former Boston Cardinal Bernard Law — were key players in pushing the hostile takeover of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, or LCWR, which they have long viewed with suspicion for emphasizing social justice work over loyalty to the hierarchy and issues like abortion and gay marriage.

Vatican observers in Rome and church sources in the U.S. say Law was “the person in Rome most forcefully supporting” the LCWR investigation, as Rome correspondent Robert Mickens wrote in The Tablet, a London-based Catholic weekly. Law was the “prime instigator,” in the words of one American churchman, of the investigation that began in 2009 and ended in 2011. The actual crackdown was only launched in April. ................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/are-americans-in-rome-behind-the-nuns-crackdown/2012/05/04/gIQAA8m41T_story.html

[chieftain]

1. K & R

[jberryhill]

2. Ratzo has always been like this...

As far as he's concerned, the left wing clerical elements in Latin America who have been targeted by reactionary authorities and death squads all pretty much got wha they deserved (again in his view).

He was always more concerned with doctrinal purity among those serving the poor than whether they were effectively serving the poor.