General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShouldn't Bush The Impaler be polling more than 17% nationwide and 14% in South Carolina?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.htmlhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/sc/south_carolina_republican_presidential_primary-4151.html
He's the freaking grandson of a northeastern senator, a the son of a president, and the brother of another one, and he's polling at 17%.
That is embarrassing !!!
I know it's early but juggernaut my a$$ !!!
1939
(1,683 posts)a "juggernaut" for Bush (or Walker or Cruz) won't begin to form until Iowa and New Hampshire have "thinned the herd". People will then start coalescing around their favorite.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Unless the Bush brand is damaged.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)His statements on Immigration are almost as bad for them as someone who is anti-choice or anti-LGBT rights would be for us Democratic grass roots. It's a complete non-starter.
17% is a terrible place for a presumptive front-runner to start out before the attacks begin, particularly with the obvious lines of attack open to Jeb's opponents.
It's going to be someone from the most whack-job wing of the GOP this time and I have already said I think that it will be Cruz.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I would have to look at a map...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)the fact that he is smart enough and ruthless enough to throw his own party under the bus (the crazy filibuster, etc) in an effort to appear to be more Conservative than thou and set himself up as the most Conservative candidate for President, as I noted here:
I'm afraid that he is much smarter than many of us realize and that everything up until now has been a game to him with the goal of getting the power of the Presidency. We underestimate him at our peril.
The thing we would have in our favor if he is the nominee is that I think he thinks he is too smart for his own good and will make some mistakes out of hubris.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That's ten or so states right there...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)like Barack, she is going to pull some voters that other candidates might not get and will increase turnout beyond what some candidates might get.
I think we're underestimating the appeal of a viable female candidate will be to women. I'm excited about it and I am not a woman!
Yupster
(14,308 posts)Republicans don't want another Bush.
His one chance is that he can raise enough money to just outlast all the others and hope they get disqualified one after another until he's the last option left standing. Then Republicans will take him holding their noses.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I was told here that he was a juggernaut who was immensely popular with his base and that our presumptive nominee wasn't.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)would like a Bush or Clinton if there was another choice.
To the Repubs there is, and I don't think Bush has much chance.
To the Dems, there may not be a choice.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Prescott got appointed to the Senate when Connecticut's then-Senator died unexpectedly. Poppy and the Ayatollah winked about Israel and the planes filled with Hawk missile parts. Smirko probably can't spell Rehnquist, but he can do the math 5-4. Jebthro, seems to also to know who really can count:
Stop! Please, a million at a time will do just fine.
http://www.allgov.com/news/where-is-the-money-going/jeb-bush-asks-donors-to-limit-contributions-to-1-million-eachfor-now-150306?news=855870
Money is speech, per same 5-4 math.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)nomination and piss off your own grass roots that you expect to go to the polls and vote for your party candidate a few months later.
Not going to happen.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)And he hasn't announced he's running yet (though we know he is).