Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsApril 13, 2000: Metallica's Napster lawsuit "unwittingly became a defining moment of their career"
Metallica is one of the biggest rock bands in the world, but their April 13, 2000, lawsuit against the file-sharing site Napster unwittingly became a defining moment of their career.
The path to the courtroom began in June 1999, when college dropout Shawn Fanning and teenage hacker Sean Parker launched a program whose moniker came from the formers childhood nickname. Napsters original aim was to create a way for people to search for files and talk to each other, Newsweek reported in 2000. To build communities around different types of music, Fanning was quoted as saying in the article.
However, the expansion of high-speed internet, particularly on college campuses, made the program the perfect solution for students eager to search for and download mp3s. Finding rare (or even common) songs became as easy as typing in a band name or a song title in a search bar. Soon, thousands of people were swapping music files like digital baseball cards, using Napster as the conduit.
Naturally, the music industry was not pleased, and acted swiftly. In early December 1999, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued Napster. The organization released a statement, which contained this quote from Cary Sherman, senior executive vice president and general counsel for the RIAA: Napster is about facilitating piracy, and trying to build a business on the backs of artists and copyright owners. Gold Mountain Managements Ron Stone was even blunter in that same statement: It is the single most insidious Web site Ive ever seen.
http://ultimateclassicrock.com/metallica-napster-lawsuit/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 849 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
April 13, 2000: Metallica's Napster lawsuit "unwittingly became a defining moment of their career" (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Apr 2015
OP
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)1. Screw Metallica
randome
(34,845 posts)2. Napster in its heyday was a glorious thing. Fond memories here.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)[/center][/font][hr]
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)3. They're attrocious
And it's hilarious to read Lars saying this was not about money.
Fuck him. If shit wasn't about money they'd still be putting on the Orion Festival.