Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:13 AM Apr 2015

National Enquirer: Hillary Clinton is a lesbian.

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/exclusive-hillary-clinton-lesbian-lovers-named-secret-emails


I'm not going to quote the article,suffice to say that the article relies on "unnamed sources close to her" and manages to appeal to both Clinton haters and homophobic bigots. I don't know who the GOP's new Rove is,but the whispering campaign has turned into a sickening shout.
114 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Enquirer: Hillary Clinton is a lesbian. (Original Post) sufrommich Apr 2015 OP
It's OK with me. I still won't support her for president. nt NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #1
Way to miss the point. nt sufrommich Apr 2015 #3
Yes, but yet another chance to justhanginon Apr 2015 #11
+1. n/t obnoxiousdrunk Apr 2015 #15
+1 LordGlenconner Apr 2015 #29
Yep Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #67
Yes , but his 3000 votes against are going to swamp my single vote for rock Apr 2015 #103
If she gets the nomination, will you be taking your act to the Lounge during the GE? 11 Bravo Apr 2015 #13
I'm shocked sharp_stick Apr 2015 #19
Yeah, no kidding. This ridiculous rumor has circulated for decades. razorman Apr 2015 #60
Maybe we can keep a log of the number of times upaloopa Apr 2015 #54
That's starting to be way redundant. MineralMan Apr 2015 #76
so you're going to stop posting against Hillary here if she gets the nomination? CreekDog Apr 2015 #79
If she gets the nomination, and I don't think she will, I will be her harshest critic. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #81
I'm sure it will go fine as long as you don't tell them your thoughts on pedestrians CreekDog Apr 2015 #85
I am an environmentalist and we feel that impeding vehicular flow produces more greenhouse gases. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author mylye2222 Apr 2015 #90
read the California Vehicle Code and learn: CreekDog Apr 2015 #100
It is a well known fact that, in this state, the pedestrian is assumed to have right of way anytime. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #105
I've always advocated for an all walk/pedestrian scramble signaling system, you argued against CreekDog Apr 2015 #107
When/if Hillary gets the nomination I'll be thanking god for the Ignore Button. Sheepshank Apr 2015 #86
who cares if she is? her sexuality is irrelevant. samsingh Apr 2015 #2
This isn't about her sexuality, this is about sufrommich Apr 2015 #5
I think we can do without the bigot vote anyway jberryhill Apr 2015 #14
just like the "Obama is a Muslim", which thanks to right wing propaganda, 20% believe still_one Apr 2015 #51
I know, I don't care what sexual orientation my candidate has, I'm not going to sleep with them. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #9
exactly samsingh Apr 2015 #10
What NYC_SKP said. BlueJazz Apr 2015 #12
My observation is that the 99% need to vote. I do not have the wisdom to know what comes first, Ninga Apr 2015 #31
Correct Ninga. First, put up a fighter for the 99%. Then, get the 99% out to vote. Easy Peasey! NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #32
OK coach! I'm on your team. I dig easy peasey! Let's do it! Let's get it done! Ninga Apr 2015 #34
LOL mylye2222 Apr 2015 #47
Just who did you contribute to? Or are you one upaloopa Apr 2015 #57
I contributed to Senator Warren's campaign. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #62
She doesn't have a presidential campaign upaloopa Apr 2015 #97
I contributed to the Senator's senatorial campaign. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #98
News Flash for the Enquirer! leftofcool Apr 2015 #4
LOL. Welcome back to 1990. nt DURHAM D Apr 2015 #6
THIS^^^^^ treestar Apr 2015 #52
All Hillary roads lead to 1974 and her role in the Watergate investigation. displacedtexan Apr 2015 #106
This is not the first, nor will it probably be the last time justiceischeap Apr 2015 #7
Yup! 2naSalit Apr 2015 #30
Congrats? Iggo Apr 2015 #8
Watch for the anti-Hillary crowd at DU to pick this up and run with it...nt SidDithers Apr 2015 #16
I love the way some are saying "so what if it's true" sufrommich Apr 2015 #18
Oh, I wouldn't worry about that too much. Xithras Apr 2015 #24
By way of her personal life? sufrommich Apr 2015 #26
It's the Enquirer Xithras Apr 2015 #28
One of the things which is untrustworthy is information repeated over and over in talking points. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #55
Pick what up? fadedrose Apr 2015 #56
Watch for DU conservatives to smear critics of Clinton with it ... nt Scootaloo Apr 2015 #101
Oh please. nt cwydro Apr 2015 #17
I was waiting with bated breath for this to reemerge. TexasProgresive Apr 2015 #20
So It Wasn't RobinA Apr 2015 #21
Right? nt sufrommich Apr 2015 #22
No no no, get with the program, RobinA. Bill screwed around because his wife was a lesbian. Right? Hekate Apr 2015 #71
Nope, Bill screwed around because his wife is an emasculating, ball-breaking, man-hater! Blue_Tires Apr 2015 #78
OMG! That is so funny. leftofcool Apr 2015 #83
Locking. Not LBN. KamaAina Apr 2015 #23
yes. i would not date a man. i went from virgin, slut, lesbian. we get there are those that like seabeyond Apr 2015 #25
What took them so long? I expected this shit to start no later than Monday. arcane1 Apr 2015 #27
Great! Depaysement Apr 2015 #33
I think I'd like her more if it were true tkmorris Apr 2015 #35
There's going to be a lot of old stuff dredged up, better develop thick skin. This is nothing new mother earth Apr 2015 #36
I don't believe any of this about Hillary. cwydro Apr 2015 #38
Sometimes they do get real info, and at times like these, they are probably getting paid by the mother earth Apr 2015 #48
I agree. cwydro Apr 2015 #65
Oh Please, No RobinA Apr 2015 #94
Wait wut?! Behind the Aegis Apr 2015 #37
I hear she was a thespian who matriculated at Wellesley. nt msanthrope Apr 2015 #39
lol. nt sufrommich Apr 2015 #40
Sounds pretty dirty, no? nt msanthrope Apr 2015 #43
I remember reading about that campaign tactic used sufrommich Apr 2015 #45
Did you know that at Wellesley boys and girls were COLGATE4 Apr 2015 #50
She masticates at the dinner table every night, too! Scootaloo Apr 2015 #102
Good for her... TeeYiYi Apr 2015 #41
.... okasha Apr 2015 #109
... TeeYiYi Apr 2015 #111
According to the National Enquirer VScott Apr 2015 #42
They've also said the Obama's are divorcing because of Pathwalker Apr 2015 #49
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!! treestar Apr 2015 #53
She caught his eye when Biden was groping her one day jberryhill Apr 2015 #80
According to the National Enquirer Angel Martin Apr 2015 #61
Creating RW non scandaks with nothing but fear using. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #44
Wooo hoooo! 3.8% of the voters! underahedgerow Apr 2015 #46
I think it's true Politicalboi Apr 2015 #58
If true, this is supposed to bother us how? liberal N proud Apr 2015 #59
So what if she is? Dertainly would make no difference in if I would vote for her. nt kelly1mm Apr 2015 #63
What happens between consenting adults is none of my business. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #64
... geomon666 Apr 2015 #66
Right on schedule. That charge is an oldie-but-goodie for the RW. Soon the "murders" will be back. Hekate Apr 2015 #68
She was caught masticating in public MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #69
Uh huh. And tonight, Fox News will undoubtedly be reporting that "some people say" she's a lesbian. winter is coming Apr 2015 #70
And that's how "news" is done in these latter days. nt Hekate Apr 2015 #74
If I see one of those in the grocery line I am going to take them out of the shelf and throw them jwirr Apr 2015 #72
Don't waste your breath. She already has the LGT vote. McCamy Taylor Apr 2015 #73
Why Is This Bullshit Posted On DU? WTF Corey_Baker08 Apr 2015 #75
I don't agree, but so what if she is? notadmblnd Apr 2015 #77
more like 'National Disgrace' spanone Apr 2015 #82
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #84
so...explain n/t Sheepshank Apr 2015 #87
! NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #91
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #93
So? get the red out Apr 2015 #88
that is a time worn wingnut shit accusation. Just as is the "Obama is gay" cali Apr 2015 #92
And? Thor_MN Apr 2015 #95
Ugh. Why'd you drag this fish wrap here? AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #96
No pun intended... TeeYiYi Apr 2015 #112
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #99
Sure and President Obama was born in Kenya workinclasszero Apr 2015 #104
Once you lose the Enquirer's readership, you're sunk. bluedigger Apr 2015 #108
She sure is. And Elvis just gassed up my Rolls-Royce hifiguy Apr 2015 #110
That's hot. graegoyle Apr 2015 #113
They dredged this back up from the 90s AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #114

justhanginon

(3,290 posts)
11. Yes, but yet another chance to
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:25 AM
Apr 2015

make his point about not voting for Hillary Clinton. Just in case anyone missed it the first 3000 times.

razorman

(1,644 posts)
60. Yeah, no kidding. This ridiculous rumor has circulated for decades.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:27 PM
Apr 2015

Along with, "She murdered Vince Foster" and "Webb Hubbell is Chelsea's biological father", among others. It will circulate for a day or two, and die down. Par for the course in politics.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
54. Maybe we can keep a log of the number of times
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:13 PM
Apr 2015

you feel the need to tell us you won't support her.
How many times have you told us since she announced?

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
76. That's starting to be way redundant.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:03 PM
Apr 2015

We know. You've told us frequently. I'm not sure how it's relevant to this thread, though.

I mean, you can keep repeating it until general election campaign time, of course. We already know, though, that you don't support Hillary Clinton's candidacy and won't vote for her if she is the nominee. We get it.

Your choice.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
81. If she gets the nomination, and I don't think she will, I will be her harshest critic.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:35 PM
Apr 2015

But my criticism will be designed to encourage others to work within the system, the rules outside and inside this board, to pressure her to adopt more enlightened positions than her history has indicated she is willing to adopt absent such pressure.

Hey, BTW, I'm in the city tomorrow for a thing at CalAcademy in the park in case you want to get together.

I'm there a lot, including on opening day(s) back whenever that was and with a CBS crew and some students, we had the full inside out tour of the LEED platinum facility, inside out and all over the roof. I wish I could post my selfies w celebs but not here.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
85. I'm sure it will go fine as long as you don't tell them your thoughts on pedestrians
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:38 PM
Apr 2015

expect it to go very badly if you say that kind of stuff to environmentalists.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
89. I am an environmentalist and we feel that impeding vehicular flow produces more greenhouse gases.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:47 PM
Apr 2015

We encourage good traffic flow, HOV lanes do this.

Every time a car has to stop, it wastes inertial energy and converts it into heat, it's wasteful when that happens.

Then you have a car at rest that needs to accelerate back up to speed, additional loses of energy and burning of fossil fuel.

That's just plain bad.

Controlled intersections work best, with traffic lights that alternate N-S with E-W and pedestrian traffic in a three-way light, rather than the pedestrians getting their light at the same time as the cars.

Don't you agree that might be safer and environmentally sound, let cars go when it's cars' turn, and stop all cars for pedestrians?

Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #89)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
100. read the California Vehicle Code and learn:
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:30 PM
Apr 2015
VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21949-21971

21950.
(c) The driver of a vehicle approaching a pedestrian within any
marked or unmarked crosswalk shall exercise all due care and shall
reduce the speed of the vehicle
or take any other action relating to
the operation of the vehicle as necessary to safeguard the safety of
the pedestrian.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=veh&group=21001-22000&file=21949-21971


the law anticipates that a vehicle would slow down. any large street with multiple lanes or cross traffic is going to necessitate that vehicles slow for crossers because there are many streets where traffic is far too busy to have a gap large enough for a pedestrian to cross without vehicles slowing down or stopping to allow it.
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
105. It is a well known fact that, in this state, the pedestrian is assumed to have right of way anytime.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:03 PM
Apr 2015

Your citation has nothing to do with what makes sense.

We know that stupid ass pedestrians, children, drunkards, cranksters, and escaped convicts might dash out at any time, and drivers are on notice to be on the lookout and slow and stop for these.

They also need to stop for boorish, self-important city fools who CHOOSE to step out in front of traffic even when the lights say "Don't Walk".

Everyone here in California knows this, CreekDog.

So, would you care to respond to whether or not it would be a good idea for cities to adopt controlled intersections as described in my earlier reply, in which N-S, E-W, and pedestrian traffic all have their turns, that none are permitted to move at the same time.

(not that drivers could plow over scofflaws, they still need to slow for pedestrians who cross against lights)

My plan is safest for busy intersections, we've been doing it in some cities for generations.

No right on red, and an all pedestrians may walk rotation in the signal light program.



CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
107. I've always advocated for an all walk/pedestrian scramble signaling system, you argued against
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 08:43 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4268030

glad you're coming around on that one, though the rant above it against people walking in cities (when you call people "fools" and "stupid ass...&quot is rather off the rails, so to speak.

and all your bragging about never causing cars to even so much as slow down or brake is not possible in a large city and most higher density suburbs. to get across those streets does require cars to slow and stop where there are crosswalks but no signal lights.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
86. When/if Hillary gets the nomination I'll be thanking god for the Ignore Button.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:41 PM
Apr 2015

Thanks for the heads up.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
14. I think we can do without the bigot vote anyway
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:26 AM
Apr 2015

Seriously, who gives a shit.

As if there is someone in any reality who was thinking:

"Well, I was going to vote for Hillary, but now that I hear she's a lesbian the deal is off."

I mean, seriously, so fucking what if it is "appealing to bigots".

The bigot vote is already spoken for. God forbid we lose the bigot vote.
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
9. I know, I don't care what sexual orientation my candidate has, I'm not going to sleep with them.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:21 AM
Apr 2015

Give me a fighter for the 99%.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
31. My observation is that the 99% need to vote. I do not have the wisdom to know what comes first,
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:47 PM
Apr 2015

a fighter for the 99% or that the 99% take on the belief that voting is in their best interest.

No matter the progression, there still needs to be progression. Be that a fighter for the 99% or that the 99% come to the realization

that they must invest skin in the game, meaning becoming voting patriots.

Someone has to start somewhere, is all that I am saying. The more that participate the more organic the process will become and

allow fighters to be recognized.

Until then. I am a Supreme Court voter and will vote for whomever the D is.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
32. Correct Ninga. First, put up a fighter for the 99%. Then, get the 99% out to vote. Easy Peasey!
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:50 PM
Apr 2015

That's how we do.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
57. Just who did you contribute to? Or are you one
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:16 PM
Apr 2015

of those all talk and no action types?
By the way no body else is running.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
97. She doesn't have a presidential campaign
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 04:16 PM
Apr 2015

I live in CA too. Did you contribute to the group trying to get Senator Warren to run?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
98. I contributed to the Senator's senatorial campaign.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 04:23 PM
Apr 2015

I have not yet contributed to the MoveOn effort to encourage her to run.

I contributed to an out-of-state campaign because I am taken by her passion and integrity.

And, to be honest, I wanted her in a position to be able to run for POTUS.

So far, so good.

This has been a tough financial year for me with the brain aneurism and three additional surgeries, lots of expense and lost productivity.

Two years ago, however, I'd have gladly donated a chunk to MoveOn or whichever effort there is.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
106. All Hillary roads lead to 1974 and her role in the Watergate investigation.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:34 PM
Apr 2015

And no, she wasn't fired from the committee. From Snopes:

At that time, the Judiciary Committee comprised 37 members of the House of Representatives and was chaired by Representative Peter Rodino, Jr., of New Jersey. The Judiciary Committee was assisted by a permanent staff, on which attorney Jerry Zeifman served as Chief Counsel, and (for this occasion) by a separate Impeachment Inquiry staff assembled to determine whether President Nixon had committed impeachable offenses. That inquiry staff was headed by former U.S. Justice Department lawyer John Doar, and one of his hires was a 26-year-old Yale Law School graduate then known by her maiden name of Hillary Rodham (who a few years later would marry future Arkansas governor and U.S. president Bill Clinton).

A pair of articles published during Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in 2008, one by Northstar Writers Group founder Dan Calabrese and one by Jerry Zeifman himself, asserted that Zeifman was Hillary's supervisor during the Watergate investigation and that he eventually fired her from the investigation for "unethical, dishonest" conduct. However, whatever Zeifman may have thought of Hillary and her work during the investigation, he was not her supervisor, neither he nor anyone else fired her from her position on the Impeachment Inquiry staff (Zeifman in fact didn't have the power to fire her, even had he wanted to do so), and his description of her conduct as "unethical" and "dishonest" is his personal, highly subjective characterization (and the "facts" on which he bases that characterization are ones that he has contradicted himself about on multiple occasions).
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp#cF62RViVZEf8FzpR.99


justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
7. This is not the first, nor will it probably be the last time
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:20 AM
Apr 2015

That she's been "outed".

This has been a long-standing bit of gossip about her.

2naSalit

(86,536 posts)
30. Yup!
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:45 PM
Apr 2015

I heard it way back in the early 90s when my boss gave me a lecture on how she was a lesbian and only supported lesbians for Cabinet positions.

If that's all they've got to go on, let them flame out on their own.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
18. I love the way some are saying "so what if it's true"
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:55 AM
Apr 2015

as if that is the point. It's meant to paint her as secretive and devious.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
24. Oh, I wouldn't worry about that too much.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:17 PM
Apr 2015

Most of us who oppose her realized that she was secretive and untrustworthy LONG before the Enquirer pulled this stunt.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
26. By way of her personal life?
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:21 PM
Apr 2015

I don't care what you think of her politics,but to dismiss this sort of shit flinging because you don't care for her politics is utter bullshit.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
28. It's the Enquirer
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:27 PM
Apr 2015

They fling shit at everyone. It's their raison d'etre. If you're getting worked up over one of their articles, you need to turn your sensitivity down a bit.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
55. One of the things which is untrustworthy is information repeated over and over in talking points.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:15 PM
Apr 2015

It is some of the same crap I read in the tabloids.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
56. Pick what up?
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:16 PM
Apr 2015

That's been rumored for years and I don't care about whether she is or she isn't. Am more concerned with her relationships on Wall Street.


According to our platform, it's nobody's business. Only republicans will bring it up and lose votes because of it.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
20. I was waiting with bated breath for this to reemerge.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:02 PM
Apr 2015

Makes me no difference, but I don't think she is-who knows-Bill Clinton, who cares-not me.

RobinA

(9,888 posts)
21. So It Wasn't
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:15 PM
Apr 2015

his affair with Hillary that led Vince Foster to kill himself, it was finding out she was gay? These people need to make up their minds.

Hekate

(90,644 posts)
71. No no no, get with the program, RobinA. Bill screwed around because his wife was a lesbian. Right?
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:53 PM
Apr 2015

It was her fault.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
78. Nope, Bill screwed around because his wife is an emasculating, ball-breaking, man-hater!
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:12 PM
Apr 2015

And if she's elected, it will encourage every other woman to stomp on our crotches with their jackboots or stiletto heels as men everywhere become subjugated to the emerging New Order of Amazon dominance...

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
23. Locking. Not LBN.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:17 PM
Apr 2015

The trashy tabloid press has been throwing this around for years.

I never did understand how she was supposed to be having an affair with Vince Foster if she was a lesbian.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
25. yes. i would not date a man. i went from virgin, slut, lesbian. we get there are those that like
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:21 PM
Apr 2015

to use womens sexuality against them. we do not care. our sexuality is not their weapon.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
27. What took them so long? I expected this shit to start no later than Monday.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 12:26 PM
Apr 2015

They must be getting lazy out there.

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
36. There's going to be a lot of old stuff dredged up, better develop thick skin. This is nothing new
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 01:03 PM
Apr 2015

to HRC, she knows full well that the smear campaign will be full on, as usual for any candidate in the big race. The enquirer is a known rag that prints all manner of trashy stories. It is a sad commentary on our political process, 2016 will be no exception.

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
48. Sometimes they do get real info, and at times like these, they are probably getting paid by the
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 01:54 PM
Apr 2015

opposition. Who can believe any of it, and why it would matter is beyond me, this kind of crap deserves NO attention, unless it is of the lawsuit variety.

Behind the Aegis

(53,949 posts)
37. Wait wut?!
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 01:07 PM
Apr 2015

Did I just go back in time? If so, note to self, don't worry about going to Oklahoma, you'll meet the most wonderful man in the world and marry him!

Back in our time, I think I have an Enquirer from that period with the same story. I used to use it in diversity presentations. I'll have to look.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
45. I remember reading about that campaign tactic used
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 01:21 PM
Apr 2015

many many years ago. There have always been Karl Roves in American politics.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
50. Did you know that at Wellesley boys and girls were
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:05 PM
Apr 2015

forced to share the same curriculum? (I know, I know, Wellesley was only female)

 

VScott

(774 posts)
42. According to the National Enquirer
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 01:18 PM
Apr 2015

every celebrity is...

A) Gay

B) a lesbian

C) having an affair

D) any combination of A,B,C.

Pathwalker

(6,598 posts)
49. They've also said the Obama's are divorcing because of
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:00 PM
Apr 2015

Obama's affair with Hillary. So many lies, so many dead trees....

Angel Martin

(942 posts)
61. According to the National Enquirer
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:28 PM
Apr 2015

every celebrity is...

A) Gay

B) a lesbian

C) having an affair

D) any combination of A,B,C.

E) has a terminal illness


next Enquirer story: "Hillary Clinton's sad last days"

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
44. Creating RW non scandaks with nothing but fear using.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 01:20 PM
Apr 2015

As I distrust HRC... Spreading this is futile, childish and done to distract people on the isses.



 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
58. I think it's true
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:17 PM
Apr 2015

But so what. I think her and Bill had a deal long ago. Both very smart, and both wanted the same thing. If elected, I hope she comes out if it's true.

Hekate

(90,644 posts)
68. Right on schedule. That charge is an oldie-but-goodie for the RW. Soon the "murders" will be back.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:48 PM
Apr 2015

I swear, I keep telling people here that every single lie Hillary has ever been accused with will be cycling back during this campaign.

Young'uns need to know we have heard it all before and it is nothing new. Younger voters of any affiliation need to be told this so they won't be taken in.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
69. She was caught masticating in public
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:49 PM
Apr 2015

the other day, at Chipotle. In front of children!

It's rumored that she has a powerful need to masticate several times each day.

(Hey jury: don't believe the alerter, look the word up for yourself.)

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
70. Uh huh. And tonight, Fox News will undoubtedly be reporting that "some people say" she's a lesbian.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:53 PM
Apr 2015

In a week, CNN will be wondering aloud whether it's fair game to speculate on a candidate's sex life, purportedly condemning the National Enquirer's story while repeating it, multiple times a day for three days.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
72. If I see one of those in the grocery line I am going to take them out of the shelf and throw them
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 02:54 PM
Apr 2015

on the floor. Trash.

Response to sufrommich (Original post)

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
91. !
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:51 PM
Apr 2015

There's a lot of that going around.

ProTip: Don't reply to replies on this board asking you to expound on a statement unless you are friends with them, it might result in a hide.

That's all.

Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #91)

get the red out

(13,461 posts)
88. So?
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:43 PM
Apr 2015

First, I couldn't care less about someone's private life. Second, was there also a story about someone being impregnated with an alien baby? I'd buy the rag for one of those!

Response to sufrommich (Original post)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
104. Sure and President Obama was born in Kenya
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:52 PM
Apr 2015

And is a secret Muslim and and aliens mated with Michael Jackson and are taking over the world with the help of the illuminati and and....black helicopters!

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
108. Once you lose the Enquirer's readership, you're sunk.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 09:08 PM
Apr 2015

Nobody can win without that voter bloc. She should just withdraw now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»National Enquirer: Hillar...