Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,981 posts)
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:10 AM Apr 2015

William Shatner’s $30 Billion Kickstarter Campaign to Save California

Exclusive: William Shatner’s $30 Billion Kickstarter Campaign to Save California



William Shatner. Wow. He’s 84 years old, looks 65, and juggles a schedule that would exhaust a team of 10. Book projects, TV projects, tech projects, horse-riding projects, charity projects. And his willingness to embrace the tech world is impressive; he’s got YouTube channels, he’s conducted Kickstarter projects, and he has a huge Twitter presence: more than 2 million followers. (He’s tweeted 30,000 times so far — and yes, it’s really him.)

The hour he spent with me in a Yahoo Tech Mix interview wasn’t even enough to scratch the surface.

Exclusive: William Shatner’s $30 Billion Kickstarter Campaign to Save California
We’ll post more of that interview shortly, but this bit couldn’t wait: “You’re gonna get a scoop here,” Shatner told me. This is it.

“California’s in the midst of a 4-year-old drought,” he said. “They tell us there’s a year’s supply of water left. If it doesn’t rain next year, what do 20 million people in the breadbasket of the world do? In a place that’s the fifth-largest GDP — if California were a country, it’d be fifth in line — we’re about to be arid! What do you do about it?”

Here’s the plan:


MORE:
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/exclusive-william-shatners-30-billion-116672789084.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

malthaussen

(17,183 posts)
1. Gotta admire him for thinking big.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:21 AM
Apr 2015

But he's politically naive if he thinks that anyone will support a project to benefit the people. Now, if he was proposing an oil pipeline, say, to ship the stuff to China, we'd already be breaking ground.

-- Mal

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
2. Thread on this from yesterday:
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:22 AM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6528379

My response: Cap'n, ye been snortin' the dilithium crystals again? Washington Governor Inslee has declared a drought emergency, so that doesn't add up to excess water. Almost all of the West, including the Northwest, is experiencing drought conditions to one extent or another. I really don't think they are going to be amenable to getting a tap on the shoulder from California for their water.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
3. In 1992, the cost of a sub-sea pipeline from Prince Rupert Sound
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:25 AM
Apr 2015

was estimated at $150 billion.

There's probably been some inflation since then.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
4. William Shatner I have the perfect place. acres next to Kern County wildlife refuge.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:26 AM
Apr 2015

They flood the wildlife refuge every year for duck hunting season. The entire area was a lake 100 years ago.

Warpy

(111,233 posts)
5. There are already plans to float it in from Sitka
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:26 AM
Apr 2015

but what California needs to do is realize the drought has been going on for 13 years, not 4, and to realize this is perfectly normal from time to time and that they'd better prepare for it to settle in and act accordingly.

Agriculture uses 80% of the water and that's where the biggest capital investment has to come, changing from spray irrigation to subsoil drip irrigation. Yes, that makes mechanization problematic for some crops. However, they need to reduce as much evaporation of scarce water into the air as they can and drip irrigation is the way to do it.

Homeowners are going to have to learn how to do things like wash clothing less frequently and bag the dishwashers, they're water wasters. Golf courses need to Astroturf their fairways, although the putting green with grass is likely to stay. Water hazards should be no more.

Swimming pools need solar covers to stop evaporation when no one is swimming.

Lawn grass and English gardens need to go.

Instead of a pipeline so they can continue to be profligate with water, California needs a period of trying to conserve it so that after the next wet/dry cycle, they won't be caught quite as dry as they are now.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
6. Agriculture in Calfiornia uses 80% of our water. Consumers: 20%.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:51 AM
Apr 2015

The problem isn't that we don't have enough water to sustain our State. The problem lies with California's agriculture that uses and wastes 80% of our water supply, and have for YEARS.

What California needs to do is have agriculture go the Dylan Ratigan way: change California's water-wasting farms into hydropronic farms that would CUT water use on farms by 90%! THIS is what we need to do in addition to stopping the fracking (or charging taxes for it), recycling water and conserving water, as well. Then we'll be all right.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»William Shatner’s $30 Bil...