Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hollande favors a 75% tax on the wealthy! (Original Post) aquart May 2012 OP
75% at what point? MrSlayer May 2012 #1
No idea. I heard it on the TV news which is notoriously detail poor. aquart May 2012 #2
I think I read that it was a million euros. n/t pnwmom May 2012 #4
$1.3 million dkf May 2012 #6
Top tax bracket was 91% under Eisenhower MannyGoldstein May 2012 #3
The difference is in the times... TedBronson May 2012 #10
Oh, yeah, we can't lose Mister Charlie. What would we ever do... jtuck004 May 2012 #12
Where would they go? Confusious May 2012 #13
Probably one of these countries towards the top... TedBronson May 2012 #14
I'm sure an american Confusious May 2012 #15
They might leave? AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #16
Let them leave. Freeze the money. Seize the assets. aquart May 2012 #27
They'd have to give up their US passports. closeupready May 2012 #18
Not if there is international cooperation on a crackdown -- and that is entirely JDPriestly May 2012 #20
In FDR's time, there was only one person in the top tax bracket. Kaleva May 2012 #26
He has also promised to balance the French budget in 5 years. dkf May 2012 #5
Yes, there is little difference between Hollande and Sarkozy. girl gone mad May 2012 #8
Yup, Greece is the main story today. Prometheus Bound May 2012 #11
Citi says 75% chance Greece exits Euro. dkf May 2012 #24
If Citi is trying to cause a panic, ask why. aquart May 2012 #28
Our billionaire controlled media will make him out to be a villain! dmosh42 May 2012 #7
He's a new Hitler! nxylas May 2012 #9
It will be interesting to see how that works out. Nye Bevan May 2012 #17
No, they've still got Switzerland for banking, the US doesn't closeupready May 2012 #19
Did you look at the local council elections in Britain? aquart May 2012 #29
Think that's a little too high, myself Prophet 451 May 2012 #21
Why? JHB May 2012 #22
I admit to being an economic doofus Prophet 451 May 2012 #23
Where? aquart May 2012 #31
The UK for example Prophet 451 May 2012 #32
Of course, if they did like the US and tax income wherever closeupready May 2012 #34
Not at all. The point is to crush the power of the ultra-monied class. aquart May 2012 #30
I'm wondering if that will actually happen... cynatnite May 2012 #25
K&R grahamhgreen May 2012 #33
 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
1. 75% at what point?
Mon May 7, 2012, 04:08 AM
May 2012

On every dollar above a billion? A hundred million? Ten million? What is the progression?

aquart

(69,014 posts)
2. No idea. I heard it on the TV news which is notoriously detail poor.
Mon May 7, 2012, 04:14 AM
May 2012

And I got excited! Me, I want 85% over the first ten million, all income any source. But I am an agreeable, flexible person who is open to compromise.

Billionaires are a parasitical cancer on the economy and there are two cures: surgical removal or taxation.

We should have economic screenings to prevent billionaires exactly the same way we go after breast cancer. Look for suspicious lumps.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
3. Top tax bracket was 91% under Eisenhower
Mon May 7, 2012, 04:58 AM
May 2012

And Republicans controlled both houses of Congress.

And America did fine. Much better than today.

 

TedBronson

(52 posts)
10. The difference is in the times...
Mon May 7, 2012, 05:50 AM
May 2012

Under Eisenhower, there were far fewer options to pick up and leave to a less taxing environment.

The modern worldwide economic system makes it much simpler.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
12. Oh, yeah, we can't lose Mister Charlie. What would we ever do...
Mon May 7, 2012, 07:17 AM
May 2012

*lots and lots of hand-wringing*

wait...

You know, fuck 'em.

They aren't investing today - what the hell do we CARE what they do?

They are just acting as the beneficiaries of we sharecroppers at best, and that's the most generous spin I can think of. They offer nothing we can't figure out otherwise. Not enough investment in the country now, and propping up their assets for some unlikely future promise while screwing everyone else in the country by focusing on debt instead of jobs is creating more damage, more tragedy and lives lost than Bin Laden ever dreamed of. Those 6 million homes that are out there in some stage of foreclosure are inhabited by people who we can PROVE will suffer shorter lives, higher needs for medical care, more poverty, and worst of all will not be able to contribute to the security and wealth of this country. Over 50 million people who are not working today would be at work tomorrow if there were jobs, but as long as they cannot consume they cannot contribute to our economy. Which IS our security.

Let 'em go - like they aren't already trading out of China and Thailand and Vietna,...a dozen other countries... anyway - we will be better off, those of us that stay will and can figure it out. Invest in training around science, math, engineering, energy, agriculture, writing, philosophy and business for as many as want to go, put an additional 15 million people to work at a decent wage for 2-3 years while we put together the base for the next future.

Or keep paying blood money to the banks while they continue to perpetrate their fraud, knowing full well that 20 years from now they will have even more of the money, and we will be less secure.


Confusious

(8,317 posts)
13. Where would they go?
Mon May 7, 2012, 07:39 AM
May 2012

Somalia?

If they leave, someone else will pick up what they leave. Maybe we'll be better off.

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
15. I'm sure an american
Mon May 7, 2012, 08:16 AM
May 2012

would love to go to one of those countries.

Nothing like being an outsider with your money for the rest of your life.

But, hey, if that's what you love, please go.

completely shows no loyalty to the United States either, so I could do without those people.

Besides which, I pay 30%. You're saying those MFers shouldn't?

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
16. They might leave?
Mon May 7, 2012, 09:56 AM
May 2012

If we had a government that wanted to go after them, isn't our military big enough to find them?

If we had a government that wanted to follow the 100% penalty model (26 USC 6672, for example), a 100% penalty could be imposed upon all transfers of wealth out of this country. We don't.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
27. Let them leave. Freeze the money. Seize the assets.
Mon May 7, 2012, 09:23 PM
May 2012

RICO if they have used the money to subvert our laws and elections. Or treason, sedition...whatever works. I can be quite unpleasant in this regard.

Evidence of foreign accounts...

Billionaires are a parasitical disease on our economy and body politic.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
18. They'd have to give up their US passports.
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:23 AM
May 2012

Since US citizens are taxed on income they make, even if they don't live in the US.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
20. Not if there is international cooperation on a crackdown -- and that is entirely
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:27 AM
May 2012

possible. Shutting down (or better said, opening up for scrutiny?) the hiding of income in tax havens has been discussed for years now.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
5. He has also promised to balance the French budget in 5 years.
Mon May 7, 2012, 05:10 AM
May 2012

In a nod to fiscal prudence, Hollande has promised to balance France's books by the end of 2017, a feat that has not happened in 30 years. To that end, he is insistent that the budget deficit target of 3% of gross domestic product for next year must be reached.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-france-president-election-20120507,0,1868345.story

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
8. Yes, there is little difference between Hollande and Sarkozy.
Mon May 7, 2012, 05:45 AM
May 2012

People have read too much into that outcome.

Greece, on the other hand, now has a real chance at change.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
9. He's a new Hitler!
Mon May 7, 2012, 05:48 AM
May 2012

We need to invade France immediately. All those nucular power stations, they must be up to no good.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
17. It will be interesting to see how that works out.
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:14 AM
May 2012

Citizens of any European Union country have the right to live and work in any other EU country. Won't many French people who are subject to this tax simply move to London and be taxed at 45% instead? Especially since London is a fairly short train ride from Paris these days?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
19. No, they've still got Switzerland for banking, the US doesn't
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:25 AM
May 2012

since I believe the Swiss banks won't do banking with US citizens any longer.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
29. Did you look at the local council elections in Britain?
Mon May 7, 2012, 09:27 PM
May 2012

I'd wait a bit before cruising the internet for London real estate.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
21. Think that's a little too high, myself
Mon May 7, 2012, 12:23 PM
May 2012

I applaud the attitude to finally tax the rich but I think 75% is a bit too high.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
22. Why?
Mon May 7, 2012, 12:36 PM
May 2012

The main effect of high marginal tax rates isn't the levy itself but in changing the economic landscape about what decisions are prudent to avoid paying that high rate.

Longer-term stability and reinvesting in the business becomes more favorable than maximizing what you get in the latest quarter, because after a point Uncle Francois (or Sam) gets the lion's share. And it certainly takes some of the charm out of some of the big derivatives gambling, or the sort of buy-up-and-liquidate that Romney's put back in the news.

It's actually a market solution to that sort of extractive practice. It changes the incentives. We're not under any obligation to make it easier for people who are already wealthy to get even more wealthy as fast as possible, especially when they do so by squeezing everyone else.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
23. I admit to being an economic doofus
Mon May 7, 2012, 12:42 PM
May 2012

But I worry that a tax rate set so high will encourage the rich of France to simply move their assets to other territories.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
34. Of course, if they did like the US and tax income wherever
Mon May 7, 2012, 11:20 PM
May 2012

they live, the French could move to Tomboucktou but still be responsible to pay taxes to the French state.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
30. Not at all. The point is to crush the power of the ultra-monied class.
Mon May 7, 2012, 09:29 PM
May 2012

75% is actually too low for that.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
25. I'm wondering if that will actually happen...
Mon May 7, 2012, 12:45 PM
May 2012

Seems to me there will be a lot of opposition. I wouldn't be surprised if some compromise happens.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hollande favors a 75% tax...