General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToo Much Sitting Raises risk of Death Even if You Exercize CBS News/ Annals of Internal Medicine
Last Updated Jan 20, 2015 10:14 AM EST
CBS Link:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/too-much-sitting-raises-risk-of-death-even-if-you-exercise/
Beware, couch potatoes: The evidence is piling up that too much sitting can take a serious toll on your health.
A new study links sitting for prolonged periods of time to increased risk for heart disease, diabetes, cancer and early death -- even in people who get regular exercise.
"Even if you do a half an hour or an hour or of exercise every day doesn't give us the reassurance that sitting for the other 23 hours is ok. In fact, it's not," said Dr. David Alter of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, one of the authors of the study.
The study, published Monday in Annals of Internal Medicine, is based on a review and analysis of previous research. It found that the health hazards seem to be greatest for people who sit 8 or 9 hours a day. The impact was even more pronounced in people who did not exercise regularly.
The study found sitting for prolonged periods raised the risk of cardiovascular disease by 14 percent, cancer by 13 percent, and diabetes by a whopping 91 percent. Those who sat for long stretches and got no regular exercise had a 40 percent higher risk of early death. With regular exercise, the risk was smaller but still significant: about 10 percent.
Link from Annals of Internal Medicine:
20 January 2015
Sedentary Time and Its Association With Risk for Disease Incidence, Mortality, and Hospitalization in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Aviroop Biswas, BSc; Paul I. Oh, MD, MSc; Guy E. Faulkner, PhD; Ravi R. Bajaj, MD; Michael A. Silver, BSc; Marc S. Mitchell, MSc; and David A. Alter, MD, PhD
http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2091327
Data Synthesis: Forty-seven articles met our eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes for cardiovascular disease and diabetes (14 studies), cancer (14 studies), and all-cause mortality (13 studies). Prospective cohort designs were used in all but 3 studies; sedentary times were quantified using self-report in all but 1 study. Significant hazard ratio (HR) associations were found with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.240 [95% CI, 1.090 to 1.410]), cardiovascular disease mortality (HR, 1.179 [CI, 1.106 to 1.257]), cardiovascular disease incidence (HR, 1.143 [CI, 1.002 to 1.729]), cancer mortality (HR, 1.173 [CI, 1.108 to 1.242]), cancer incidence (HR, 1.130 [CI, 1.053 to 1.213]), and type 2 diabetes incidence (HR, 1.910 [CI, 1.642 to 2.222]). Hazard ratios associated with sedentary time and outcomes were generally more pronounced at lower levels of physical activity than at higher levels.
Limitation: There was marked heterogeneity in research designs and the assessment of sedentary time and physical activity.
Conclusion: Prolonged sedentary time was independently associated with deleterious health outcomes regardless of physical activity.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess this means for me, that I will sit at the computer less. Perhaps I will rearrange it, so I got to stand and use it. The CBS short clip shows the lady standing...but, I sit to damn much..and that is the truth.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I'd die from high blood pressure. Just live life and do it all in moderation and maybe you will end up dying in your sleep. Life is a crapshoot though. It never ever goes as planned especially Heath.
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)I can sit for say 40 min, and walk or move around for 20 min..that should help. To me, it is important that I do not sit too long. For me..each of us has to decide on their own. Nevertheless, I think this study is important to know about. That is why I posted it for all to read and consider...
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)It is important to know. I just get overwhelmed by everything bad for us.
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)I think that it is the continuous sitting without a break that is so harmful. So after a 2 hour movie, we go for a walk and try not to sit down for a while. There is no extra charge to get up for a while. From what I have read, the human body was meant to walk around often, and not to sit down all day. I don't know, I am just as addicted to this thing that I am typing on as the next one. We need to do the best we can to improve some, and that is it...
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I love sitting around and doing nothing!
I walk my dog, work and keep busy--but man, there is nothing like sitting around and being Zen and doing nothing. I seriously love it.
I don't watch much tv, but I love to just chill, play on my phone or chat on the phone.
I'm sure I sound like a complete moron, but I need my do-nothing chill time!
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Is there any data relating to causation here?
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)London Transport Workers Study:
http://www.epi.umn.edu/cvdepi/study-synopsis/london-transport-workers-study/
London Transport Workers Study
Study Category: Coronary heart disease and physical activity of work. (1953) Lancet 265, 1053-1057.
Study Category: The Cohort Studies (1947-1972)
Years: 1949 - 1952
Location: London, England
Principal Investigator: Morris, Jeremy
.
Background/Question:
The study compared the rates of coronary heart disease (CHD) between drivers and conductors of the London Transport Executive. The investigators formed the hypothesis: Men in physically active jobs [conductors] have a lower incidence of coronary heart-disease in middle age men than have men in physically inactive jobs [conductors]. More important, the disease is not so severe in physically active workers, tending to present first in them as angina pectoris and other relatively benign forms, and to have a smaller early case-fatality and a lower early mortality-rate. [1]
Methods:
Special arrangements were made to examine the medical and absence records of the employees between the investigators, the Chief Medical Officer and the Staff Administration Officer of the London Transport Executive. [2] About 31,000 men aged 35-64 employed as bus, trams and trolleybus drivers and conductors, motormen and underground railway guards were observed. These employees were chosen because the numbers in each grade were large and the groups were homogeneous as regards occupation. [2] All sickness absences were recorded from the Central Record of Staff Statistics, and subsequent medical diagnoses were obtained from the employees general practitioners, hospitals and London Transport medical officers. Cases of heart disease with absences of any duration were flagged and coded. Copies of death certificates were also checked for any indication of coronary heart disease deaths. [2]
Results:
The investigators found 80 cases of coronary heart disease (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and immediate mortality from CHD) in 30,726 person-years for drivers, and 31 cases in 19,166 person-years for conductors. [2] The annual rate of CHD for drivers was 2.7 per 1,000, and 1.9 per 1,000 for conductors. The investigators did not provide additional statistical analysis on these results, but did make note that the differences were likely significant: Is this a chance phenomenon? Statistical tests suggest that it is unlikely. It is also worth recollecting that, although numbers of cases are too small for many rates to be calculated, the distribution of the various types of first presentation of coronary heart disease differs in the conductors of central buses from that of the drivers of central buses; likewise, the distribution of cases in the tram and trolleybus conductors differs from that in their drivers. [2]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This study concluded 60 years ago, showed that the ticket takers (conductors) and walkers around, were 50 percent less likely to have heart attacks then the bus drivers that sat all day.. it is the pioneering study of its kind..Also, it was found out that the sitters (bus drivers) lived less than the conductors (walker arounders).....The conductors, lived an average of 14 years longer than the sitters, and their quality of life was better..
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)I understand the lack-of-exercise bit, but what is it about sitting that causes the harm?
JanMichael
(24,881 posts)Even more so than previously imagined. That London study above is the biggest study done and sitters just due faster than sanders and walkers. Get a standing desk to start.