General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIntellectual Property Rights Watch and Yale are suing the USTR over TPP access
ntellectual Property Watch has been working for several years to obtain more details about the intellectual property aspects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement negotiations through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, and a subsequent lawsuit to enforce that request, which is being led by a team at the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School (MFIA). Today MFIA, a program of Yales Information Society Project and Abrams Institute, released an update on the case.
The MFIA Clinic is bringing a FOIA suit to compel the USTR to disclose information about the draft texts of the agreement, the US negotiating positions, and the advice negotiators are receiving from industry trade advisers. Update on recent developments below.
(It is noted that as an independent media agency, Intellectual Property Watch takes no position on the actual substance of the negotiations, but is simply seeking to report on them in an informed way (beyond just the meeting dates and topics on the agenda).
On April 3, 2015, Intellectual Property Watch (IP-Watch) completed its written arguments to the federal district court in Manhattan in a case that could compel the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to release basic information regarding USTRs negotiations over the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement. In particular, IP-Watchs lawsuit and summary judgment motion asks U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos to order USTR to release documents that relate to the intellectual property provisions of the TPPincluding USTRs final negotiating positions, the portions of the draft agreement that the U.S. has proposed or adopted, and communications between USTR and the industry representatives who sit on Industry Trade Advisory Committees (ITACs). Both IP-Watch and USTR have filed opposing summary judgment motions and are now waiting for Judge Ramos to rule on the case.
<snip>
http://www.ip-watch.org/2015/04/21/yaleip-watch-effort-to-open-tpp-updated/
cali
(114,904 posts)The litigation follows USTRs denial of IP-Watchs March 2012 FOIA request. USTR did not respond to IP-Watchs request for more than a year. When it did respond, it withheld the majority of the documents it located, and produced only a fraction of the email traffic between USTR and ITAC members with very heavy redactions. In December 2013, IP-Watch filed its lawsuit to enforce the publics right of access under the Freedom of Information Act. IP-Watchs lawsuit prompted USTR to re-review and release additional, less redacted email communications and certain other documents that it had previously withheldeffectively admitting that the agency had for years kept far too much information secret. But the agency continues to refuse to release any documents containing information regarding the TPPs actual contents, or the ITAC members detailed comments on the draft language of the agreement. Most notably, USTR has invoked the national security classification system to withhold any documents that contain U.S. proposals, negotiating positions or draft language for the agreement. USTR has argued that disclosure of such information to the public would harm foreign relations, even though all such material has already been disclosed to the other countries participating in the negotiations.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)and politically inconvenient facts than to protect legitimate national security interests. At this point it has been abused so often that when I hear that claim asserted I just assume that they are lying their asses off or have something embarrassing or inconvenient to hide.
They have turned it into somewhat of a joke.
cali
(114,904 posts)Most transparent administration ever. NOT
Omaha Steve
(99,506 posts)K&R!
OS