Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStop Vilifying Almonds
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2015/04/almonds_in_california_they_use_up_a_lot_of_water_but_they_deserve_a_place.htmlThis years rainy season is over, and California is beginning to accept its fate: Business-as-usual farming in the Golden State may soon become a thing of the past. The drought is now so far beyond the bounds of normal its become at least temporarily self-sustaining. Extreme heat begets more evaporation, and dry ground heats up more quickly than wet soil. Add in a dash of global warming, and you have a recipe for a megadrought that may last decades. For a state whose decades-long water-fueled bender has made it the most important agricultural producer in the country, one that leads the nation in countless water-intensive food crops, thats all pretty terrifying.
It also explains the heated debate weve been having recently over, of all things, almondsor THE DEVILS NUT, as Gizmodo facetiously called them recently. Amid the massive new water restrictions now in place in California, water-intensive almonds have become an easily vilified, easily visualized scapegoat.
Its true that California has to get smarterfastabout using what little water it has left. But we should recognize that the state has other, much sillier uses of water than almondslike depleting Californias desert aquifers to grow hay and corn to fatten cows. (Nebraska already does a pretty good job at that.) Im by no means an almond apologist, but all this recent almond-shaming demands some context. And, in fact, theres a strong case that it makes great sense for almonds to remain central to the future of California agriculture.
For now, Californias unique Mediterranean climate is almost ideal for almonds to flourish. Yes, almonds use a lot of water, but thats not necessarily a bad thing. Almonds are much more efficient water-users, per calorie, than dairy or beef, for example. (As a Wisconsin resident, I feel duty-bound to remind everyone at this point that dairy farming can be done almost anywhereand indeed, dairies in search of more reliable water are leaving California because of the current drought.) Replacing a glass of cows milk with almond milk is a net gain for the environment. But almond trees, which must be watered even when theyre not producing, have been gradually displacing fields of row crops that can be fallowed when the weather turns dry. That means by planting almonds, farmers are locking in future water use for decades to comea troubling trend.
It also explains the heated debate weve been having recently over, of all things, almondsor THE DEVILS NUT, as Gizmodo facetiously called them recently. Amid the massive new water restrictions now in place in California, water-intensive almonds have become an easily vilified, easily visualized scapegoat.
Its true that California has to get smarterfastabout using what little water it has left. But we should recognize that the state has other, much sillier uses of water than almondslike depleting Californias desert aquifers to grow hay and corn to fatten cows. (Nebraska already does a pretty good job at that.) Im by no means an almond apologist, but all this recent almond-shaming demands some context. And, in fact, theres a strong case that it makes great sense for almonds to remain central to the future of California agriculture.
For now, Californias unique Mediterranean climate is almost ideal for almonds to flourish. Yes, almonds use a lot of water, but thats not necessarily a bad thing. Almonds are much more efficient water-users, per calorie, than dairy or beef, for example. (As a Wisconsin resident, I feel duty-bound to remind everyone at this point that dairy farming can be done almost anywhereand indeed, dairies in search of more reliable water are leaving California because of the current drought.) Replacing a glass of cows milk with almond milk is a net gain for the environment. But almond trees, which must be watered even when theyre not producing, have been gradually displacing fields of row crops that can be fallowed when the weather turns dry. That means by planting almonds, farmers are locking in future water use for decades to comea troubling trend.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 774 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop Vilifying Almonds (Original Post)
KamaAina
Apr 2015
OP
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)1. Yeah, come on guys, that's just nuts.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)2. I see what you did there.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)3. Damn, it's all over now.
And here I was going to milk that for all it was worth.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)5. Your plan has been shelled.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)6. This is the pits.
lame54
(35,277 posts)4. I'm not a nuttist but