General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsugh, Bruce Jenner comes out of the closet...
as a Republican.
says he "believes in the Constitution"
Was watching Dianne Sawyer's special on him and everything was going great, it was interesting and then he threw that out there.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)is believing in the Constitution a partisan ideology?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Republicans allow him to keep more money. He may say Constitution but taxes are part of it I guess.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Lots of us believe in the Constitution, including the 1st, 4th and 5th Amendments. Those who bring it up tend to be naive and focused on the 2nd Amendnent.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)patricia92243
(12,595 posts)are patriotic and believe in the Constitution as a living, changing document.
So, did Jenner say he was a Republican or not???
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Log Cabin Republicans welcome Bruce Jenner 'as transgender and as a conservative Republican' - @LogCabinGOP
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Bruce identified as female in the same interview.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)per Diane Sawyer.
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #12)
oberliner This message was self-deleted by its author.
marym625
(17,997 posts)He said that this is the last interview we will see him. He will give us her name when he emerges as her.
It will be interesting to see how he parses out being a Republican(which is actually the political allegiance you'd expect Bruce and Le Famille Kardashian to take, given their position in the class system)with becoming a transwoman(the group that may have it harder than any other in this country these days in some respects, and a group whose very existence causes massive cranial eruption among most GOP voters).
marym625
(17,997 posts)I honestly missed him saying that. Maybe I fell asleep for a couple minutes and didn't realize it. I watched the entire show.
I doubt that he is very political. I could be wrong.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)The fact he's a republican was maybe two minutes of the whole interview, and it was a very interesting interview.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)It was a fascinating interview - not at all sensationalist, but rather intimate and informative.
Anyone that would not watch because of Bruce Jenner's political affiliation is missing out on a great story, IMO.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)You seriously can't respect each other enough to listen to them? How sad.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)it when someone gets rich and joins the con party to save on taxes no matter how much it harms others.
I HATE that
FreeState
(10,571 posts)He didn't state why he is a republican other than he believes in the Constitution.
marym625
(17,997 posts)And I truly don't remember him saying that. I say him because he said, until he publicly emerges as her, we should say him.
It is worth watching. It is truly a great vehicle toward understanding what many transgender people go through. It will help, I believe, a dialog that will benefit society.
Just mho.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)and her/his affiliation with a political party based almost solely on saving money on taxes, pisses me off.
Given the harm that political party wants to do to his/her community.
But, as Ari Rabin-Havt said today, maybe by being a con he/her can get some of them to stop being such assholes about this, maybe.
BTW, the Amazon original series "Transparency" is a must see for every living human being.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I will have to get it.
I posted about the hope with transgender and Republicans this morning. If you are interested.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026574492
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)...
...
woolldog
(8,791 posts)He said he's a Republican.
And then Diane looked at him stunned.
And then he said "I believe in the constitution"...as if liberals don't
Cha
(297,158 posts)I only saw part of the interview and wish that I could have watched it all, but I missed that part.
The part I saw was fascinating.
It occurs to me that the biggest reason he gets to choose his gender is because he has the wealth to afford to ... many people cannot even choose whether they get to eat tonight. But given he has the ability to make the choice, I respect it, and think that his making the process public and open is probably more helpful than harmful to people who truly struggle with gender identity.
It's sad that he's a republican and as such would deny important choices to others. (Like, frequently, whether they get to eat tonight.)
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)SMH
Lex
(34,108 posts)Oh, wait.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NT
JI7
(89,247 posts)and think the kardashian women caused him to be that way.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)It's a no brainier what's more important for Mr Jenner...
marym625
(17,997 posts)A star athlete publicly coming out as transgender should be applauded. I don't give a flying fuck how much money he makes off it. If this helps one person not kill themselves, it's worth every penny
Additionally, to think anyone goes through this for the money is absolutely outrageous
AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)He had power, a voice that could have aided in saving many many lives, he chose to wait, fear? Perhaps, sometimes to be a true hero you must make the right choices...
Not once did I say he is transgender because of money? I have no need to feel ashamed by my opinion...
marym625
(17,997 posts)He explains in detail why he waited.
You may not have said that was the reason but it sure read that way.
May you never have to be in this position
AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)Again, I stand by it...
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Also, the GOP is at war with the LGBT community. Jenner is doing himself and his fellow LGBT no favors by supporting the current GOP.
Laffy Kat
(16,377 posts)Those family members aren't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)JHB
(37,158 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)aren't conservatives. Jenner isn't a Kardashian.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)According to Kourtney:
"My household is really split-up. The parents are Republicans and the children are Democrats, so its like a political warfare in our household when we talk about politics."
wordpix
(18,652 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)Thanks Hepburn.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)I am not for ignoring those inconvenient parts like the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th amendments.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)what political affiliation someone they do not know belongs to.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Your answer makes abundant sense for private individuals but not public ones, especially wealthy and influential ones, as the latter have much more influence.
treestar
(82,383 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Do you think you or me will get to say we are Democrats to tens of millions of people on prime time television?
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Who cares about his political affiliation?
You really think your average low info voter will be happy that a transgender Kardashian shares their political views?
The guy/gal is famous, but I sure don't think he will influence anyone's vote.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If he didn't have influence he wouldn't have been given a two hour platform on prime time t v and his pronouncement be the topic du jour the next day.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I think there is a difference between celebrity and influence. That ridiculous show with the Mama June character and the child (name eludes me right now) is an example. They seem to be on various shows, but I cannot believe anyone would be influenced by them, nor by any of the idiotic Kardashians.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)into the Kardashian family. I'm sorry but Olympic athlete making a gender transition is something Americans will ponder because he's an athlete and America tends to be very macho about sports. I was told on DU this week that by having an opinion contrary to that of straight men, I am simply too emotional and need to order some boxing matches on PPV like Jesus wants me to. So yeah, sports culture.
Honey Boo Boo's Mom, for what it's worth, never won a gold medal and also voted for Obama.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)No, I do agree with you on the gender transition thing in regard to him being an athlete. That's all good.
I just meant I don't care about his political affiliation and I don't think his political views will influence anyone.
If his transition gives others courage, THAT I can get behind...and I think that's great.
Very cool that the mama voted for Obama. Goes to show working class folks don't all follow the herd as so often posited here on DU. I do realize she's probably not working class anymore, but that's who she was for a long time.
Sorry that someone here made that comment to you. Ignore the haters.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 25, 2015, 01:04 PM - Edit history (1)
possibly the most famous transgendered person is more out than they would want?
snpsmom
(677 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)however when Bruce or some Kardashian threw out the "wisdom" of Kanye West the channel was turned.
I will NEVER understand the fascination with those people.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I believe Bruce's transition is sincere and most of the responses of his immediately family were clearly genuine but there was some calculation between some of the responses.
BTW, I like some of Kanye's work.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)However not a fan here.
It probably stems from the fact that I have utterly no interest in the private lives of people I don't know personally. I suppose that makes me self centered.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The theory goes that by a famous person coming out it offers confirmation to others who are not famous dealing with the same issues.
Makes sense since suicide and suicide attempts is endemic to transgendered teens.
Oh, empathy is supposed to be the benchmark of liberalism.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Spare me the lecture about liberalism and empathy. I have plenty of empathy for Jenner. If her journey is good for kids that are going through the same thing, that is great. The fact that I am more interested in the transgendered daughter of my best friend rather then someone that I don't know that happens to be famous has nothing to do with my empathy or lack there of.
If your bench mark of being liberal is watching Entertainment Tonight and being fascinated with every move the Kardashians make then you are right. I fail miserably.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The thing is Bruce Jenner was given a megaphone last night and perhaps offered some confirmation and comfort to other transgendered folks who are at the beginning of their journey, in the midst of their journey, or have completed it.
It was a seminal moment.
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Reply? I can't believe on 20 second snippet is completely changing the dialogue.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)I wasn't interested in Bruce Jenner before all of this and I am not interested in her now.
I am puzzled as to how that was unclear. And I could not care less what her political affiliations are.
catbyte
(34,375 posts)If he's not attracted to guys and is a woman trapped in a man's body, I guess so. That will REALLY make bagger heads explode.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)And snickering about this such things like a backward tweenager does not reflect well on you, either.
catbyte
(34,375 posts)Is he going to stay physically a man? If so, I misunderstood. I would NEVER slam someone for who they are.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)just in a gay sort of way. Gender and orientation are two different things.
Response to woolldog (Original post)
fadedrose This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The literature suggests transgendered folks don't just like some things identified with the opposite gender, they totally identify with the opposite gender.
Oh, and sexuality and identification are best looked at through a continuum.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #33)
fadedrose This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The literature suggests transgendered folks identity is incongruous with the gender they were assigned at birth. They literally feel they are trapped in the body of the wrong gender.
As to gay couples I suspect neither or either partner has to adhere to traditional sexual norms.
Sexuality, sexual orientation, and sexual identity are complex.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Fuck me to tears...
Heddi
(18,312 posts)Things I'd only imagine reading on FR. Not DU.
he's confused
he's not mature
this is a phase
women are happier with men who like being a man
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)So much unmasked, out-in-the-open bigotry. I'm very much ashamed of DU today.
#transformationtuesday
#transhappiness
Heddi
(18,312 posts)nonsense.
Frat boy fart jokes and tee hee hee so he's a man that is married to women and what about the children he fathered...so is he a lesbian now tee hee hee.
fucking beasts here, I swear.
I'm sorry you have to read this bullshit. I'm sorry anyone does. I'm even more sorry that people aren't ashamed to show their bigotry in public.
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)It's gotta be frustrating.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)"switch between who is feminine and who is masculine in any given situation." It makes our relationship so much easier.
Christ
Hey Hed!
I am getting the business up thread for having the gall to not give a crap about Bruce Jenner or the Kardasians. How dare I.
Heddi
(18,312 posts)I love it. "So....are you the top, or the bottom?"
Uh...both? neither? all of the above? and why limit to top and bottom? I like to be in the middle to be perfectly honest with you
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Big ol' difference there.
marle35
(172 posts)It is true that there are more biological males who identify as female then vice versa. There are also more men who identify as gay then women.
When it comes to both gender and sexuality, women more often fall on a continuum. There are more women then men who identify as bisexual, more straight women who admit to same sex attractions / experiences, and likewise more gay women who claim attractions to the opposite sex. Not that they all do, but it appears to be more frequent.
Personally, I think it is both biology and society that makes women's gender and sexual identity less black and white. Most people will claim it is just society, because there are legitimate reasons for believing that society is more tolerant of women blending gender lines. However, biologically women have more 'holistic' brains, with the corpus callosum (the part of the brain that bridges the two hemispheres) being thicker in women. Who knows what other biological factors may contribute to the sex differences? As with most things, I believe there are multiple factors from the environment and biology.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)He now says he "is a woman" and has always felt this way, but I can't help
but wonder if he felt this way when fathering six children.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)No surprise, with posts like this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023521667#post42
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Stop. Just stop.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)I will give you the benefit of the doubt, for now, after that, if you wish to NOT learn about it, then obviously you would prefer to be ignorant and bigoted.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)FreeState
(10,571 posts)he came out to his wives in the 80's just for this moment. He sure can see in the future! Educate your self or at least watch the show your commenting on.
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Along with "I'm a patriot" and "I believe in traditional values" because of course you can't do any of that unless you are a "conservative".
vankuria
(904 posts)And loves his tax breaks, his politics probably only goes as far as what effects him. I would bet living in the bubble he's made for himself he has no clue how GOP politics effects the rest of us and the world.
When he transitions to a woman he may be in for a rude awakening, however may-be not, he's had a life of privilege and may continue to have one even being transgender thanks to his wealth.
I'm quite sure he has no clue how the average LGBT person or any minority deal with exclusion, bigotry, racism, poverty, hate...all issues that are not part of his world.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)to Bruce that he needs to stop buying $5000 gifts for each of his grown kids or he could be in financial dire straits one day.
Rex
(65,616 posts)since he also knows the the GOP is the ONLY party that craps on the Constitution. It is like when Foxnews has to declare (repeatedly) that they are 'Fair and Balanced".
PURE 100% REPUBLICAN PROJECTION.
Ignore it, not worthy of your consideration imo.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.
"I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."
"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"
http://rense.com/general69/paper.htm
AzDar
(14,023 posts)as a Repube (especially using the flawed and ridiculous justification Jenner did) is a fucking moron.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)I suspect GOP bakers like transsexuals as much as they like gay people. Why on earth is this person a Republican?
odd_duck
(107 posts)look at the Constitution with one-way tunnel vision.
Example;
When the Constitution talks about "Freedom of religion", the fascist Cons believe that to mean freedom of a Christian religion and all other religions don't count.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)tavernier
(12,382 posts)you are probably a republican. If you want to come out, it's probably only because you need a bigger closet. Be any gender you want to be, Bruce, but don't claim to know what it's like for transgender people who live in a world without your talent and advantages and fortune. They are disowned, ridiculed, often turning to crime or suicide because the very "conservative" people you espouse look upon them as freaks.
Buy a clue, or else stay in your cushy closet. You shouldn't be giving advice to any transgender child.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)Because all those points and more are covered in the show.
tavernier
(12,382 posts)I guess we have differing opinions.
I have difficulty understanding how he could possibly affiliate himself with people who dont like or trust "his kind".
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)After all, republicans are an ongoing threat to the health, safety, and liberty of the transgender community.
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)gordianot
(15,237 posts)..or be subjected to the wild sensational speculation of those trying to capitalize on him now her for profit.
My opinion of reality shows they are something I avoid and tend to lump commercialization of Kardashian's in the same category as Duck Dynasty.