Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresident Obama don't need Luther any more..
He is speaking some truths today..
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 806 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama don't need Luther any more.. (Original Post)
HipChick
Apr 2015
OP
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)1. Are you quoting someone in your title?
I ask because you use poor grammar in it, and I know you know the correct usage. If it's a quote, I'd like to know where it came from. Thanks.
Prism
(5,815 posts)2. Correspondent's Dinner
There was a bit with Luther as an angry translator for the President.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/04/26/3651353/obama-angry-climate-deniers/
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)3. I see. Thanks.
However, it's not a quote. The President didn't use poor grammar, nor did the article. So, it's not a quotation, but a faulty paraphrase, putting bad grammar in the President's mouth.
The title should read: "The President doesn't need Luther..." President Obama speaks correctly and grammatically.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)5. You be trippin'!
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)4. It's not uncommon for people to speak or write in colloquialistic terms.
It makes the writing fun, yanno?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)6. you don't be derailing threads no more ain't there go-