Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,982 posts)
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:47 AM May 2012

KRUGMAN to BROOKS: "That’s what Very Serious People said in the 1930s too."

.....................

1. That’s what Very Serious People said in the 1930s too. Then the approach of war finally delivered the stimulus we needed, and all those structural difficulties turned out to be imaginary.

2. Ireland was praised for its wonderful flexibility; it was a shining example of the art of the possible, declared George Osborne. Then, when things went wrong, it was told that it must fix its deep structural rigidities.

3. Anyone who says something like “If deficit spending were the route to prosperity, Greece would be in great shape” should be immediately considered not worth listening to. People in my camp have repeated until we’re blue in the face that the case for fiscal expansion is very specific to circumstance — it’s desirable when you’re in a liquidity trap, and only when you’re in a liquidity trap. I know that some people like to project their own crudity onto others, but what they’re actually demonstrating is their own ignorance.

........................

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/structural-flashbacks/?gwh=57AF3817A02CE8EE217A672248AAA644
updated to include Brook's "Serious" opinion:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/opinion/brooks-the-structural-revolution.html?hp

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KRUGMAN to BROOKS: "That’s what Very Serious People said in the 1930s too." (Original Post) kpete May 2012 OP
Always Nice, Ma'am, To See Brooks Professionally Slapped The Magistrate May 2012 #1
That, my friend, is very hilarious! mazzarro May 2012 #3
I would prescribe that dosage hourly, rather than daily... JHB May 2012 #11
Would that be the same David Brooks who just moved to a $3.95 million house? CBHagman May 2012 #25
He must have moved into Thomas Friedman's neighborhood pscot May 2012 #30
+1 uponit7771 May 2012 #14
teehee librechik May 2012 #15
That is an amazing GIF, librechik! Octafish May 2012 #17
it's hypnotic-- librechik May 2012 #20
You might enjoy this, good Sir... Octafish May 2012 #16
Yeah I read Brooks this morning... trumad May 2012 #2
Brooks is one of those "serious" conservatives who... tex-wyo-dem May 2012 #31
K&R n/t myrna minx May 2012 #4
David Brooks = Prince of Gobshites. hifiguy May 2012 #5
Where would we be without Krugman putting this all in terms we can understand? Baitball Blogger May 2012 #6
Brooks is such a weenie! RevStPatrick May 2012 #7
Krugman's #4 (a citation of Keynes) also bears repeating for asswipes like coalition_unwilling May 2012 #8
I love that man. redqueen May 2012 #9
Paul Krugman should be Secretary of the Treasury. nt Zorra May 2012 #10
Every time ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2012 #12
box at bottom of page LittleGirl May 2012 #13
I just cancelled my NY Times home delivery recently bupkus May 2012 #19
I've taken to following Krugman's blog via RSS muriel_volestrangler May 2012 #23
If you're on Facebook, "like" the New York Times, and you can link to their articles Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #26
As has been said and oft repeated recently bupkus May 2012 #18
Krugman has been on fire of late peace frog May 2012 #21
K&R! countryjake May 2012 #22
Makes me think of Mel Brooks and "The Producers" nt. bananas May 2012 #24
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2012 #27
No idea why he's putting this in terms of liquidity traps. girl gone mad May 2012 #28
k&r n/t RainDog May 2012 #29
Very nice catch. I love reading the clear writings of a Nobel winner.... nt Pholus May 2012 #32
I'm still annoyed that someone like Krugman isn't the Treasury Secretary Brooklyn Dame May 2012 #33

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
1. Always Nice, Ma'am, To See Brooks Professionally Slapped
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:48 AM
May 2012

The man needs to be, every day and twice on Sundays.

mazzarro

(3,450 posts)
3. That, my friend, is very hilarious!
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:54 AM
May 2012

Slapped down once a day and twice on Sundays -- one before service and one after service - eh?

JHB

(37,158 posts)
11. I would prescribe that dosage hourly, rather than daily...
Tue May 8, 2012, 12:10 PM
May 2012

After all, he's a severe case who's been left untreated for so long.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
2. Yeah I read Brooks this morning...
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:51 AM
May 2012

and couldn't wait for Krugmans response---LOL---and he responded exactly the way I thought he would.

When you have knuckleheads like Brooks opining about how we should fix the economy---it makes it pretty obvious the Conservatives haven't a clue.

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
31. Brooks is one of those "serious" conservatives who...
Wed May 9, 2012, 02:04 AM
May 2012

Casts himself quite the intellectual, but when you peel a layer or two away on his arguments you find it's all empty BS and backed-up by nothing or pure hyperbole.

There is no such thing as an intellectual conservative...purely a mythological creature.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. David Brooks = Prince of Gobshites.
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:08 AM
May 2012

The profundity of a Burma-Shave sign, but absent any of the depth or wit.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
7. Brooks is such a weenie!
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:29 AM
May 2012

I am contractually obligated to say that every time I hear or read his name.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
8. Krugman's #4 (a citation of Keynes) also bears repeating for asswipes like
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:52 AM
May 2012

Brooks who claim to support long-term solutions, rather than short-term fixes:

In the long run, we're all dead!

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
9. I love that man.
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:57 AM
May 2012

Krugman, of course.

Been a fan since he started trying to warn people about the housing bubbling. Love love love.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
12. Every time ...
Tue May 8, 2012, 12:27 PM
May 2012

I hear this long-run fix argument, I'm reminded of the surgeon that comes to see the waiting family of the patient. The doctor exclaims: "The operation was a success; but the patient died."

LittleGirl

(8,282 posts)
13. box at bottom of page
Tue May 8, 2012, 12:29 PM
May 2012

you have 5 of 10 free articles remaining this month.

Love Krugman

Rats! it's only the 8th. What do you all think about them (NYTimes) asking to pay up to view their articles?

 

bupkus

(1,981 posts)
19. I just cancelled my NY Times home delivery recently
Tue May 8, 2012, 12:51 PM
May 2012

In response to their recent policy change regarding online articles.

If more people take the same approach it just might get the Times' attention.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
23. I've taken to following Krugman's blog via RSS
Tue May 8, 2012, 05:59 PM
May 2012

Although they've arranged NYT blogs so that you don't get the main text, you can see how often he's posting. The 'front page' for his blog holds the 15 most recent posts; so when it gets near that number, I look at the front page.

In fact, I think that doesn't count towards the NYT monthly count anyway, because it's a "blog front", and they said:

"Get 10 articles each month on NYTimes.com, as well
as access to the home page, section fronts, blog fronts
and classifieds"

when they announced the restrictions. But I'm not 100% certain about that.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
26. If you're on Facebook, "like" the New York Times, and you can link to their articles
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:27 PM
May 2012

from their Facebook page.

Otherwise, Google the name of the article and access it by following the link.

There ARE ways around the pay wall.

(I refuse to subscribe, because their original subscription fee was $49 a year, and now it's $15 a month.)

peace frog

(5,609 posts)
21. Krugman has been on fire of late
Tue May 8, 2012, 01:12 PM
May 2012

and all the better for us that he is hitting the 1% and their slavish mouthpieces with everything he's got. ANd he's got a helluva lot.

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
28. No idea why he's putting this in terms of liquidity traps.
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:38 PM
May 2012

Greece can't deficit spend as needed because their debts are in Euro, a currency which they do not control.

If Greece had a sovereign currency or if the ECB would print more Euro to stimulate the periphery as needed, there would be no liquidity trap, which is merely a symptom of the structural problems inherent to the Euro.

I'm happy to see him arguing against austerity, but I wish he finally put the pieces together and dump the neoclassical claptrap.

Brooklyn Dame

(169 posts)
33. I'm still annoyed that someone like Krugman isn't the Treasury Secretary
Wed May 9, 2012, 08:42 AM
May 2012

or at least on the POTUS' advisory team. He has a way of putting conservative arguments in their proper place -- the toilet. Conservative policies have done nothing more than trample on the security of the middle class and place more people at the bottom of the economic ladder.

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/05/the-bare-minimum-wage/

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/04/stealing-from-the-hungry/

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/04/the-great-divide/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»KRUGMAN to BROOKS: "...