Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:08 PM Apr 2015

Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations

Hillary Clinton’s presidential run is prompting new scrutiny of the Clintons’ financial and charitable affairs—something that’s already proved problematic for the Democratic frontrunner, given how closely these two worlds overlap. Last week, the New York Times examined Bill Clinton’s relationship with a Canadian mining financier, Frank Giustra, who has donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and sits on its board. Clinton, the story suggests, helped Giustra’s company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received “a flow of cash” to the Clinton Foundation, including previously undisclosed donations from the company’s chairman totaling $2.35 million.

Giustra strenuously objects to how he was portrayed. “It’s frustrating,” he says. And because the donations came in through the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (CGEP)—a Canadian affiliate of the Clinton Foundation he established with the former president—he feels doubly implicated by the insinuation of a dark alliance.

“We’re not trying to hide anything,” he says. There are in fact 1,100 undisclosed donors to the Clinton Foundation, Giustra says, most of them non-U.S. residents who donated to CGEP. “All of the money that was raised by CGEP flowed through to the Clinton Foundation—every penny—and went to the [charitable] initiatives we identified,” he says.

The reason this is a politically explosive revelation is because the Clinton Foundation promised to disclose its donors as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming secretary of state. Shortly after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, the Clinton Foundation signed a “memorandum of understanding” with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the “Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative” (as the charity was then known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow “the same protocols.”

It hasn’t.

Giustra says that’s because Canada’s federal privacy law forbids CGEP, a Canadian-registered charity, from revealing its donors. A memo he provided explaining the legal rationale cites CGEP’s “fiduciary obligations” to its contributors and Canada’s Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. “We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors,” he says.

more...

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-04-29/clinton-foundation-failed-to-disclose-1-100-foreign-donations

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Foundation Failed to Disclose 1,100 Foreign Donations (Original Post) Purveyor Apr 2015 OP
NY Times article alp227 Apr 2015 #1
Baseless smears don't belong here... joeybee12 Apr 2015 #2
Sorry joey but I'm going to post 'em when I find 'em from mainstream sources. The 'Ignore' featur Purveyor Apr 2015 #3
Yes, and we all know how valid Judith Miller's reporting in the Times joeybee12 Apr 2015 #7
This "story" is going exactly nowhere, 6000eliot Apr 2015 #4
Bernie would be ashamed of your post dsc Apr 2015 #5
John Podesta did lobbying work for Uranium One ... quadrature Apr 2015 #6
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
2. Baseless smears don't belong here...
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 07:59 PM
Apr 2015

Should I say where? Will you overly-sensitive Clinton haters alert?

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
3. Sorry joey but I'm going to post 'em when I find 'em from mainstream sources. The 'Ignore' featur
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 10:00 PM
Apr 2015

might be beneficial for you if this might cause you distress.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
7. Yes, and we all know how valid Judith Miller's reporting in the Times
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:05 AM
Apr 2015

was...thanks for the advice..never really saw anything of merit that you posted anyway.

dsc

(52,160 posts)
5. Bernie would be ashamed of your post
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 10:18 PM
Apr 2015

First, she didn't help his company secure a deal. It wasn't his company, even if she had somehow helped the company get the deal, which there is literally zero evidence of her having done. Bernie doesn't deal in smears, you shouldn't be doing so in his name.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clinton Foundation Failed...