Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:28 PM Apr 2015

If you call yourself a socialist today, almost nobody in the US will vote for you

We can, of course, argue back and forth forever about whether this is fair or whether the American electorate is screaming bonkers mad to take this view

But regardless of such arguments, it's simply a fact

This hasn't always been the case:

At its peak a century ago, the Socialist Party of America polled at 6 percent nationally, had two representatives in Congress and boasted hundreds of state and local legislators. But for more than a generation, socialism has been virtually invisible on the American scene. Its return in several high-profile local city council races—Sawant’s in Seattle, Ty Moore’s in Minneapolis and Seamus Whelan’s in Boston—has been surprising


Sawant won election in 2013; Moore and Whelan lost

In the last 50 years, two towns have elected socialist mayors: in the mid-70s, University Heights IA (pop 1050) elected David Belgum; and since 1980, Burlington VT has elected Bernie Sanders, Peter Clavell, and Bob Kiss


36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you call yourself a socialist today, almost nobody in the US will vote for you (Original Post) struggle4progress Apr 2015 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Apr 2015 #1
Have a nice day struggle4progress Apr 2015 #9
Many, many voters are going to absolutely love democrank Apr 2015 #2
Yep. nt cyberswede Apr 2015 #25
People love Bernie's message. Are they more scared of a populist or corporations? appalachiablue Apr 2015 #29
Makes you wonder more socialists are not elected, huh. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #3
"If you call yourself a socialist today, almost nobody in the US will vote for you darkangel218 Apr 2015 #4
Gauge the grassroots strength of political tendencies by looking locally struggle4progress Apr 2015 #6
Hillary is trying to scramble to Bernie's left at least rhetorically Fumesucker Apr 2015 #5
Only one way to change that Scootaloo Apr 2015 #7
FDR Great Socialist and Democrat . orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #8
One needs a somewhat peculiar view to regard FDR as a socialist struggle4progress Apr 2015 #11
Social Security ? orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #13
Do you know who invented social security? former9thward Apr 2015 #19
How much longer for ours ? But thanks I didn't know that . orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #23
That's correct, the establishmnent realpolitk leader Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898) created appalachiablue Apr 2015 #36
No, actually, we are not going to argue this back and forth. djean111 Apr 2015 #10
And that, my friends, is why the US of A is so totally fucked up, and Zorra Apr 2015 #12
Saying that your opinion is a fact doesn't actually make it a fact. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #14
How many elected socialists are there in your city government? county government? struggle4progress Apr 2015 #17
Hmm, as many as have run? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #18
Maybe you should. former9thward Apr 2015 #20
The usual reason nobody runs against a candidate is because nobody else expects to win struggle4progress Apr 2015 #22
Again, what 'people expect' doesn't actually mean it's true. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #24
well, if that's ever to change voters need t cali Apr 2015 #15
strip the labels, and poll people on policy.. frylock Apr 2015 #16
Pretty close to where I grew up. stone space Apr 2015 #21
Red scare, McCarthyism, and 75 years of fascist propaganda did great damage PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #26
+ 1000 orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #27
The Red Scare, McCarthyism, and decades of propaganda did indeed create the situation struggle4progress Apr 2015 #31
It's long past time to reverse that trend! arcane1 Apr 2015 #28
It doesn't help Jamaal510 Apr 2015 #30
IMO, Sanders team should link his socialism to Einstein and Henry Wallace blm Apr 2015 #32
Is that the best you got? TBF Apr 2015 #33
After two Red Scares, the Palmer Raids, COINTELPRO, deutsey Apr 2015 #34
Bernie has never had trouble winning elections. Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #35

Response to struggle4progress (Original post)

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. Makes you wonder more socialists are not elected, huh.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:32 PM
Apr 2015

I do not think going to the far left is going to get someone elected either.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
4. "If you call yourself a socialist today, almost nobody in the US will vote for you
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:33 PM
Apr 2015

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Where is the sarcasm tag?

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
6. Gauge the grassroots strength of political tendencies by looking locally
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:40 PM
Apr 2015

People usually don't sprint miraculously into statewide or federal office: they almost always come from city councils, county commissions, and state house or senate seats, before becoming treasurer, or secretary of state, or governor, or member of congress, or President

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
5. Hillary is trying to scramble to Bernie's left at least rhetorically
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:34 PM
Apr 2015

He might just end up borking her chances in the general since she is having to make declarative statements in the primary already.

She would be best to ignore him because the flip flops if she wins the nomination after trying to out liberal-Bernie are going to be of epic proportions.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
8. FDR Great Socialist and Democrat .
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:44 PM
Apr 2015

And fascists of the day all around the world hated him for it, especially the ones who were American.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
19. Do you know who invented social security?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:02 PM
Apr 2015

No it was not Marx. It was the Iron Chancellor, Otto Bismarck, of Germany who was socialism's greatest enemy in the late 1800s. No, social security is not socialism. Many economic systems have a form of it.

appalachiablue

(41,118 posts)
36. That's correct, the establishmnent realpolitk leader Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898) created
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:56 PM
Apr 2015

Social Security and the first Welfare State in the late 1800s to provide a safety net for working people who might otherwise be drawn to full out socialism-communism. Smart leader and politician Bismarck was. And that was 130 years ago.

As part of the post WWII Allies Marshall Plan recovery, it was determined that Germany should have good wage paying jobs and UNIONS. You can understand why; impoverished, malcontented Germans (as in post WWI) have not proved to be a good thing historically.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
10. No, actually, we are not going to argue this back and forth.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:45 PM
Apr 2015

We are going to see what happens.
I hope the other candidates are also beneficiaries of all of this worrying!

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
12. And that, my friends, is why the US of A is so totally fucked up, and
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:48 PM
Apr 2015

going to hell in a handbasket faster than a Third Way politician in a bombed out Baghdad ghetto

Fortunately, this is about to change, and after Bernie is elected, there will be no more for profit insurance companies trying to kill us off, and rainbows and butterflies will appear on the streets of Ferguson and Baltimore where cops once killed African Americans with impunity.


The alternative? Same old same old...things continue to get worse by the day.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
14. Saying that your opinion is a fact doesn't actually make it a fact.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:49 PM
Apr 2015

Especially when your thesis is 'today', and then you try to back it up by talking about 'the last 50 years'.

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
17. How many elected socialists are there in your city government? county government?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:55 PM
Apr 2015

state legislature? state executive offices? state congressional delegation?

How many hours have you devoted in recent years to knocking doors, or making phone calls, to get your favorite socialist candidates into office?

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
18. Hmm, as many as have run?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:58 PM
Apr 2015

You don't support your thesis in any way, sorry. Simply saying there aren't a lot of socialists in office doesn't automatically mean it's because 'no one will vote for them'. Most of the time, it means nobody ran as a socialist. Hell, I don't have a Democrat in office as my House of Reps guy. You know why? Because no Dem actually ran for my district.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
20. Maybe you should.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:07 PM
Apr 2015

And I am being serious. I have run for Congress. Heavily R district and no support from the Dems but it was fun and I got a lot of free media.

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
22. The usual reason nobody runs against a candidate is because nobody else expects to win
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:15 PM
Apr 2015

If no D ran against your R in the House, it's because the race was widely regarded as unwinnable

Nobody runs as a socialist, because nobody expects to win as a socialist

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
24. Again, what 'people expect' doesn't actually mean it's true.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:18 PM
Apr 2015

People believe a lot of things that turn out to be wrong.

Republicans were stunned, because after they made sure everybody knew Barack Obama was actually a 'socialist', they couldn't believe people would still vote for him. Shocker, people still did.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
21. Pretty close to where I grew up.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:10 PM
Apr 2015
in the mid-70s, University Heights IA (pop 1050)


We tried it here in Ames around the same time.

The newspapers called us "self-avowed socialists". (Which made me wonder at the time why nobody ever talks about self-avowed republicans).

We got close to 40%, but lost.

Not bad for a bunch of mostly student socialists pushing a strong gay rights agenda, though.

Of course, that was back before the financial crisis, so capitalism had a good name back then in many circles, and both socialism and gay rights were somewhat frowned upon by some here in Ames at the time.





struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
31. The Red Scare, McCarthyism, and decades of propaganda did indeed create the situation
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:30 PM
Apr 2015

But that situation is currently a fact

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
30. It doesn't help
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:27 PM
Apr 2015

that most voters probably don't even know what socialism means and just go by what they hear.

blm

(113,040 posts)
32. IMO, Sanders team should link his socialism to Einstein and Henry Wallace
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:34 PM
Apr 2015

if/when the attacks are made.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
34. After two Red Scares, the Palmer Raids, COINTELPRO,
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:38 PM
Apr 2015

the authoritarianism of Stalin and Mao, right-wing misinformation and outright propaganda, it's no wonder socialism wasn't able to build on its early success in America last century (pre-WWI).

It's long over due for the left in this country to reclaim democratic socialism and start making a case for it again.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
35. Bernie has never had trouble winning elections.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:38 PM
Apr 2015

But more to the point, you are seriously afraid and upset about his candidacy. Odd if he has no chance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you call yourself a so...