General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums1967 Ford Mustang 390 GT Fastback Barn Find
You couldnt see the 67. It was probably 75 to 100 yards down a hill inside a pole barn behind her house, Junior Deese said. As he walked down the rugged North Carolina countryside, Deese struggled not to get his hopes up too high, having been disappointed far too many times in the last five or six yearshe once looked at a $7,500 fastback that turned out to be nothing more than a shell. Then, one day he got a call from a lady who lived in Erwin, North Carolina, about 35 minutes from his house in Smithfield. Nancy Snipes was her name and she had a Mustang and was thinking about selling. Her response didnt even come from an adNancy got Deeses name and number from her son who had been talking to somebody at a local car repair shop. This somebody knew Deese was looking to buy a Mustang fastback.
How does the 2015 Ford Mustang stack up to the 2015 Dodge Challenger?
Deese was intrigued to find the original Ford dealer badge on the car. Phil Long Ford is still in business in Colorado Springs, Colorado. © Provided by Hotrod Deese was intrigued to find the original Ford dealer badge on the car. Phil Long Ford is still in business in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Nancys husband, who died several years ago, had put the 1967 Mustang (which he would never sell) in a pole barn 15 years earlier. Nancy knew the Mustang was bad on gas and thats why she and her husband parked the car 15 years earlier. But she had no idea what engine was underhood. Understandably, Deese was expecting a good car this time and his anticipation built with every step he took with visions of a big-block 67 Mustang fastback dancing through his head.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthusiasts/1967-ford-mustang-390-gt-fastback-barn-find/ar-AAbwMlo?ocid=mailsignout
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)mentioned what he paid for the car. The comment section is interesting,some are claiming he sold it on ebay for $32,000.
John1956PA
(2,654 posts)They are indeed nice cars.
I usually prefer convertibles, but this model is probably my favorite Mustang.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I don't think it was the original motor.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)The 302 was first used in '68.
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)They were not that good. A Honda accord probably has more" performance" than these dinosaurs. Even worse, their styling is impacting modern car style for the worse. Sorry, I don't want a car resembling something made 45years ago.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)I'll bet a microwave oven has more "performance" than a charcoal grill, but I'll take the latter. ( and embrace the carbon footprint )
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)Other people get to voice their opinion that you sound like the enemy of fun.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Sorry, I don't want a car resembling something made 45years ago.
Better call the Porsche boys in Stuttgart and tell them to stop making the 911, then...And tell VW to stop making the Beetle, while you're at it...Hate cars looking like their relatively younger 25-year-old predecessor? You better start hatin' on the Mazda Miata...And the list goes on...
Throd
(7,208 posts)They've been flogging that same rear engined upside down bathtub since the 50's. lame lame lame.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)who are all building modern versions of 60's/70's muscle cars
Dodge Challenger
Chevy Camaro
Ford Mustang
The retro look of the Mustang was created by a immigrant from Vietnam who saw one brought there for the troops.
uncle ray
(3,156 posts)and that's an opinion i don't feel the need to be sorry for.
ileus
(15,396 posts)These so called car people don't know great styling like my 94 honda accord or 05 Sentra.
My BIL has a fastback 72 mustang, he doesn't even know it's ugly as sin compared to a 2012 Camry.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Yeah ... Right ....
kentauros
(29,414 posts)rusty fender
(3,428 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)and the other Lancia (1958 Lancia Aurelia Nardi Blue Ray 2.) I remember seeing the Blue Ray 1 (pictured) when it still needed restoration and was sitting in his home garage, covered in dust.
I don't recall what he paid for them, but it wasn't much. For some reason, I have the figure $20,000 stuck in my head, but I can't verify that at all. All I know is that the Blue Ray 2, after restoration, was worth $1.5 million. Possibly the same for the Blue Ray 1, or close to that figure.
And those aren't the only one-of-a-kind or rare vehicles I remember seeing in his shop or on his property. He seemed to have a knack for acquiring formerly priceless cars when they were almost wrecks (sometimes when they were) and turning them back into priceless cars. The man is an artist with cars
Jim Simpson
Throd
(7,208 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)all with chrome finger-grills
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And it appears to be bone stock.
That and the '66-67 396 Chevelle and Corvette with the "porcupine" heads are among the holy grails of muscle cars.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I thought all the "barnyard discoveries" were tapped out years ago?
Throd
(7,208 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)when the market was skyrocketing and quite a few serious car collectors/speculators with a lot of money and nothing better to do just went sleuthing in all the prime states for rare or highly desirable cars (iirc the South/Southeast was the 'preferred' region), tracking down paper records of sales histories, interviewing previous owners (or their descendants), etc...
I also remember a few of them got scammed hard in Alabama, since there was a silly loophole in the law that essentially made it laughably easy to fake car registrations, so 'common' classics could be sold as rare-optioned, all-original ones with some cosmetic changes, a fake VIN and some badge/part swaps...
I never hear about those guys anymore, especially since the market died down...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)but the muscle cars and other rarities from the Sixties on will keep turning up. They weren't collectible back when they got put in the barns. Now they are.
Fifteen years or so ago someone found an entire 1963 Ferrari 250 GTO in the back room of a garage in England. It was in baskets, taken apart down to the last screw and body panel. Nick Mason of Pink Floyd bought the lot and had it restored - turned out it was complete in every way and all the numbers matched. Worth about $20 million now. Of course there were only about 30 of them ever made and it IS an especially desirable and historic Ferrari.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)...for his first car (freaking spoiled).
He sold it 5 years later for (and I still get sick over it) $2,000 to help pay the mortgage. I wish like hell he had hung on to that car. I totally believe cars like that will continue to show up.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)when they get put away. They're only special 40 years later. Somewhere there's probably a Hemi Road Runner Super Bird sitting in a pole barn gathering dust.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)The notchback was far nicer.
NBachers
(17,098 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)It was the best car ever!
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)it was sprung from a museum gig.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)It won the D-stock national record in 1967.
10.8 seconds for a quarter mile. I did not own it then. I bought from a credit union that repoed it after the first owner lost his job due to illness
He showed me his trophy and gave me some bolt on traction bars because the welded ones broke. I broke the leaf springs with those traction bars. The car had so much torque that the drive shaft would hit the floor underneath
hunter
(38,309 posts)But I've never been a car guy. I hate them all.
I drive a mid 'eighties salvage title piece of shit. $800 dollars worth.
I was once part owner, with my brother, of a classic Mustang like that. We made some money.
But the highest ideals of transportation in my personal universe are good walking shoes, bicycles, electric rail, and sailboats.